Voltinism of a solitary bee was influenced by temperature but not provision size.

IF 2.3 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY Oecologia Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-08 DOI:10.1007/s00442-024-05580-5
Nicholas N Dorian
{"title":"Voltinism of a solitary bee was influenced by temperature but not provision size.","authors":"Nicholas N Dorian","doi":"10.1007/s00442-024-05580-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Changes in the timing and duration of life cycles are distinctive fingerprints of environmental change. Yet, the biotic and abiotic cues underpinning phenology and voltinism, i.e., number of generations per year, are poorly understood. Here, I experimentally test how temperature and provision size influence voltinism and survival to emergence in a solitary bee Colletes validus, and how temperature influences voltinism in the brood parasite Tricrania sanguinipennis. Within the same population, univoltine individuals emerge after 1 year (1-year form), whereas semivoltine individuals enter prolonged dormancy and emerge after 2 years (2-year form). I reared field-collected bees under 2 × 2 factorial experiments with cool (18.5 °C ± 0.5 °C) vs. warm (24 °C ± 0.5 °C) temperature treatments (bees and beetles) and no supplement vs. supplemental food treatments (+ 20% ± 5% pollen provision by mass); beetles were reared under temperature treatments only. Cool temperatures consistently increased the proportion of 2-year bees regardless of provision size, a finding that was consistent with three years of field observations. There was a demographic cost to prolonged dormancy in that both 1- and 2-year bees survived to emergence as adults, but survival of 2-year bees was approximately 50% lower than 1-year bees. Two-year beetles were produced under cooler temperatures, but unlike bees, beetles had nearly perfect survival to emergence in all treatments. This experiment advances our mechanistic understanding of the environmental drivers of voltinism in diverse insect taxa and underscores the importance of considering cryptic life stages when interpreting responses to environmental change.</p>","PeriodicalId":19473,"journal":{"name":"Oecologia","volume":" ","pages":"245-256"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oecologia","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-024-05580-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Changes in the timing and duration of life cycles are distinctive fingerprints of environmental change. Yet, the biotic and abiotic cues underpinning phenology and voltinism, i.e., number of generations per year, are poorly understood. Here, I experimentally test how temperature and provision size influence voltinism and survival to emergence in a solitary bee Colletes validus, and how temperature influences voltinism in the brood parasite Tricrania sanguinipennis. Within the same population, univoltine individuals emerge after 1 year (1-year form), whereas semivoltine individuals enter prolonged dormancy and emerge after 2 years (2-year form). I reared field-collected bees under 2 × 2 factorial experiments with cool (18.5 °C ± 0.5 °C) vs. warm (24 °C ± 0.5 °C) temperature treatments (bees and beetles) and no supplement vs. supplemental food treatments (+ 20% ± 5% pollen provision by mass); beetles were reared under temperature treatments only. Cool temperatures consistently increased the proportion of 2-year bees regardless of provision size, a finding that was consistent with three years of field observations. There was a demographic cost to prolonged dormancy in that both 1- and 2-year bees survived to emergence as adults, but survival of 2-year bees was approximately 50% lower than 1-year bees. Two-year beetles were produced under cooler temperatures, but unlike bees, beetles had nearly perfect survival to emergence in all treatments. This experiment advances our mechanistic understanding of the environmental drivers of voltinism in diverse insect taxa and underscores the importance of considering cryptic life stages when interpreting responses to environmental change.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
独居蜜蜂的伏立受温度影响,但不受供给量大小的影响。
生命周期的时间和持续时间的变化是环境变化的显著特征。然而,人们对影响物候学和伏生(即每年的世代数)的生物和非生物线索知之甚少。在这里,我通过实验测试了温度和供给量如何影响独居蜂Colletes validus的伏立和存活率,以及温度如何影响雏寄生虫Tricrania sanguinipennis的伏立。在同一种群中,单伏特个体在1年后萌发(1年型),而半伏特个体进入长期休眠并在2年后萌发(2年型)。我在 2 × 2 的因子实验中饲养了野外采集的蜜蜂,采用低温(18.5 ° C ± 0.5 ° C)与高温(24 ° C ± 0.5 ° C)处理(蜜蜂和甲虫),以及不补充与补充食物处理(按质量计算,花粉供应量为 + 20% ± 5%);只在温度处理下饲养甲虫。无论提供的花粉量多少,低温都会持续增加两年期蜜蜂的比例,这一结果与三年的实地观察结果一致。延长休眠期需要付出代价,因为1年蜂和2年蜂都能存活到成虫出壳,但2年蜂的存活率比1年蜂低约50%。两年期甲虫是在较低温度下产生的,但与蜜蜂不同的是,甲虫在所有处理中的成虫存活率几乎都很高。该实验加深了我们对不同昆虫类群中伏蛰的环境驱动因素的机理认识,并强调了在解释对环境变化的反应时考虑隐性生命阶段的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Oecologia
Oecologia 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
192
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Oecologia publishes innovative ecological research of international interest. We seek reviews, advances in methodology, and original contributions, emphasizing the following areas: Population ecology, Plant-microbe-animal interactions, Ecosystem ecology, Community ecology, Global change ecology, Conservation ecology, Behavioral ecology and Physiological Ecology. In general, studies that are purely descriptive, mathematical, documentary, and/or natural history will not be considered.
期刊最新文献
Pollen specialist bee species are accurately predicted from visitation, occurrence and phylogenetic data. Climate warming and temporal variation in reproductive strategies in the endangered meadow viper. Urbanization-induced simplification of isotopic space in birds from a big Neotropical city. Does manganese influence grass litter decomposition on a Hawaiian rainfall gradient? Increased temperatures could heighten vulnerability of an ant-plant mutualism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1