Incidence of antidepressant discontinuation symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 30.8 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Lancet Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-05 DOI:10.1016/S2215-0366(24)00133-0
Jonathan Henssler, Yannick Schmidt, Urszula Schmidt, Guido Schwarzer, Tom Bschor, Christopher Baethge
{"title":"Incidence of antidepressant discontinuation symptoms: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Jonathan Henssler, Yannick Schmidt, Urszula Schmidt, Guido Schwarzer, Tom Bschor, Christopher Baethge","doi":"10.1016/S2215-0366(24)00133-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Antidepressant discontinuation symptoms are becoming an increasingly important part of clinical practice, but the incidence of antidepressant discontinuation symptoms has not been quantified. An estimate of antidepressant discontinuation symptoms incidence could inform patients and clinicians in the discontinuation of treatment, and provide useful information to researchers in antidepressant treatments. We aimed to assess the incidence of antidepressant discontinuation symptoms in patients discontinuing both antidepressants and placebo in the published literature.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched Medline, EMBASE, and CENTRAL from database inception until Oct 13, 2022 for randomised controlled trials (RCTs), other controlled trials, and observational studies assessing the incidence of antidepressant discontinuation symptoms. To be included, studies must have investigated cessation or tapering of an established antidepressant drug (excluding antipsychotics, lithium, or thyroxine) or placebo in participants with any mental, behavioural, or neurodevelopmental disorder. We excluded studies in neonates, and those using antidepressants for physical conditions such as pain syndromes due to organic disease. After study selection, summary data extraction, and risk of bias evaluation, data were pooled in random-effects meta-analyses. The main outcome was the incidence of antidepressant discontinuation symptoms after discontinuation of antidepressants or placebo. We also analysed the incidence of severe discontinuation symptoms. Sensitivity and meta-regression analyses tested a selection of methodological variables.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>From 6095 articles screened, 79 studies (44 RCTs and 35 observational studies) covering 21 002 patients were selected (72% female, 28% male, mean age 45 years [range 19·6-64·5]). Data on ethnicity were not consistently reported. 16 532 patients discontinued from an antidepressant, and 4470 patients discontinued from placebo. Incidence of at least one antidepressant discontinuation symptom was 0·31 (95% CI 0·27-0·35) in 62 study groups after discontinuation of antidepressants, and 0·17 (0·14-0·21) in 22 study groups after discontinuation of placebo. Between antidepressant and placebo groups of included RCTs, the summary difference in incidence was 0·08 [0·04-0·12]. The incidence of severe antidepressant discontinuation symptoms after discontinuation of an antidepressant was 0·028 (0·014-0·057) compared with 0·006 (0·002-0·013) after discontinuation of placebo. Desvenlafaxine, venlafaxine, imipramine, and escitalopram were associated with higher frequencies of discontinuation symptoms, and imipramine, paroxetine, and either desvenlafaxine or venlafaxine were associated with a higher severity of symptoms. Heterogeneity of results was substantial.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Considering non-specific effects, as evidenced in placebo groups, the incidence of antidepressant discontinuation symptoms is approximately 15%, affecting one in six to seven patients who discontinue their medication. Subgroup analyses and heterogeneity figures point to factors not accounted for by diagnosis, medication, or trial-related characteristics, and might indicate subjective factors on the part of investigators, patients, or both. Residual or re-emerging psychopathology needs to be considered when interpreting the results, but our findings can inform clinicians and patients about the probable extent of antidepressant discontinuation symptoms without causing undue alarm.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>None.</p>","PeriodicalId":48784,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"526-535"},"PeriodicalIF":30.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(24)00133-0","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Antidepressant discontinuation symptoms are becoming an increasingly important part of clinical practice, but the incidence of antidepressant discontinuation symptoms has not been quantified. An estimate of antidepressant discontinuation symptoms incidence could inform patients and clinicians in the discontinuation of treatment, and provide useful information to researchers in antidepressant treatments. We aimed to assess the incidence of antidepressant discontinuation symptoms in patients discontinuing both antidepressants and placebo in the published literature.

Methods: We systematically searched Medline, EMBASE, and CENTRAL from database inception until Oct 13, 2022 for randomised controlled trials (RCTs), other controlled trials, and observational studies assessing the incidence of antidepressant discontinuation symptoms. To be included, studies must have investigated cessation or tapering of an established antidepressant drug (excluding antipsychotics, lithium, or thyroxine) or placebo in participants with any mental, behavioural, or neurodevelopmental disorder. We excluded studies in neonates, and those using antidepressants for physical conditions such as pain syndromes due to organic disease. After study selection, summary data extraction, and risk of bias evaluation, data were pooled in random-effects meta-analyses. The main outcome was the incidence of antidepressant discontinuation symptoms after discontinuation of antidepressants or placebo. We also analysed the incidence of severe discontinuation symptoms. Sensitivity and meta-regression analyses tested a selection of methodological variables.

Findings: From 6095 articles screened, 79 studies (44 RCTs and 35 observational studies) covering 21 002 patients were selected (72% female, 28% male, mean age 45 years [range 19·6-64·5]). Data on ethnicity were not consistently reported. 16 532 patients discontinued from an antidepressant, and 4470 patients discontinued from placebo. Incidence of at least one antidepressant discontinuation symptom was 0·31 (95% CI 0·27-0·35) in 62 study groups after discontinuation of antidepressants, and 0·17 (0·14-0·21) in 22 study groups after discontinuation of placebo. Between antidepressant and placebo groups of included RCTs, the summary difference in incidence was 0·08 [0·04-0·12]. The incidence of severe antidepressant discontinuation symptoms after discontinuation of an antidepressant was 0·028 (0·014-0·057) compared with 0·006 (0·002-0·013) after discontinuation of placebo. Desvenlafaxine, venlafaxine, imipramine, and escitalopram were associated with higher frequencies of discontinuation symptoms, and imipramine, paroxetine, and either desvenlafaxine or venlafaxine were associated with a higher severity of symptoms. Heterogeneity of results was substantial.

Interpretation: Considering non-specific effects, as evidenced in placebo groups, the incidence of antidepressant discontinuation symptoms is approximately 15%, affecting one in six to seven patients who discontinue their medication. Subgroup analyses and heterogeneity figures point to factors not accounted for by diagnosis, medication, or trial-related characteristics, and might indicate subjective factors on the part of investigators, patients, or both. Residual or re-emerging psychopathology needs to be considered when interpreting the results, but our findings can inform clinicians and patients about the probable extent of antidepressant discontinuation symptoms without causing undue alarm.

Funding: None.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
抗抑郁药停药症状的发生率:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:抗抑郁药停药症状正日益成为临床实践的重要组成部分,但抗抑郁药停药症状的发生率尚未量化。对抗抑郁药停药症状发生率的估计可为患者和临床医生提供停药信息,并为抗抑郁治疗研究人员提供有用信息。我们旨在评估已发表文献中停用抗抑郁药和安慰剂的患者中抗抑郁药停药症状的发生率:我们系统地检索了 Medline、EMBASE 和 CENTRAL 数据库中从开始到 2022 年 10 月 13 日评估抗抑郁药停药症状发生率的随机对照试验 (RCT)、其他对照试验和观察性研究。要纳入这些研究,必须对患有任何精神、行为或神经发育障碍的参与者停用或减量既有抗抑郁药物(不包括抗精神病药物、锂或甲状腺素)或安慰剂的情况进行调查。我们排除了针对新生儿的研究,以及使用抗抑郁药物治疗身体疾病(如器质性疾病引起的疼痛综合征)的研究。经过研究筛选、摘要数据提取和偏倚风险评估后,我们对数据进行了随机效应荟萃分析。主要结果是停用抗抑郁药或安慰剂后出现抗抑郁药停药症状的发生率。我们还分析了严重停药症状的发生率。敏感性分析和元回归分析对一些方法学变量进行了测试:从 6095 篇文章中筛选出 79 项研究(44 项 RCT 研究和 35 项观察性研究),涉及 21002 名患者(72% 为女性,28% 为男性,平均年龄 45 岁[19-6-64-5])。有关种族的数据报告并不一致。16 532 名患者停用了抗抑郁药,4470 名患者停用了安慰剂。在62个研究组中,停用抗抑郁药后出现至少一种抗抑郁药停药症状的发生率为0-31(95% CI 0-27-0-35),在22个研究组中,停用安慰剂后出现至少一种抗抑郁药停药症状的发生率为0-17(0-14-0-21)。在纳入的 RCT 研究中,抗抑郁剂组与安慰剂组之间的发病率总差异为 0-08 [0-04-0-12]。停用抗抑郁药后出现严重抗抑郁药停药症状的发生率为0-028(0-014-0-057),而停用安慰剂后的发生率为0-006(0-002-0-013)。去文拉法辛、文拉法辛、丙咪嗪和艾司西酞普兰与较高的停药症状频率相关,丙咪嗪、帕罗西汀、去文拉法辛或文拉法辛与较高的症状严重程度相关。结果的异质性很大:考虑到非特异性影响,如安慰剂组所示,抗抑郁药停药症状的发生率约为 15%,每六到七名停药患者中就有一人受到影响。亚组分析和异质性数据表明,诊断、药物或与试验相关的特征无法解释这些因素,这可能表明研究者、患者或两者的主观因素。在解释结果时需要考虑残留或重新出现的精神病理学,但我们的研究结果可以让临床医生和患者了解抗抑郁药停药症状的可能程度,而不会引起不必要的恐慌:无。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Lancet Psychiatry
Lancet Psychiatry PSYCHIATRY-
CiteScore
58.30
自引率
0.90%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Lancet Psychiatry is a globally renowned and trusted resource for groundbreaking research in the field of psychiatry. We specialize in publishing original studies that contribute to transforming and shedding light on important aspects of psychiatric practice. Our comprehensive coverage extends to diverse topics including psychopharmacology, psychotherapy, and psychosocial approaches that address psychiatric disorders throughout the lifespan. We aim to channel innovative treatments and examine the biological research that forms the foundation of such advancements. Our journal also explores novel service delivery methods and promotes fresh perspectives on mental illness, emphasizing the significant contributions of social psychiatry.
期刊最新文献
Practice and policy Correction to Lancet Psychiatry 2024; 11: 1012–21 Are global estimates of minimally adequate treatment for major depressive disorder based on minimally adequate data? Psychological interventions to prevent depression: a cause for hope Psychiatry and nephrology partnering to improve quality of care
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1