The relationship between optic disc-foveal distance with choroidal and retinal nerve fiber thickness.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY Folia morphologica Pub Date : 2024-06-10 DOI:10.5603/fm.99985
Hacı Keleş, Kürşad Ramazan Zor, Erkut Küçük, Gamze Yıldırım Biçer, Fatih Çiçek, Faruk Gazi Ceranoğlu
{"title":"The relationship between optic disc-foveal distance with choroidal and retinal nerve fiber thickness.","authors":"Hacı Keleş, Kürşad Ramazan Zor, Erkut Küçük, Gamze Yıldırım Biçer, Fatih Çiçek, Faruk Gazi Ceranoğlu","doi":"10.5603/fm.99985","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The optic disc-foveal distance is very important as it is an anatomical measure of the fundus. As this distance increases and the fundus tension, there may be variability in retinal and choroidal thickness. The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between optic disc-foveal distance and choroidal and retinal nerve fiber thickness in healthy subjects.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 72 people between the ages of 20-36 participated in the study. Optic disc-foveal distance was measured with a fundus camera and choroidal and retinal nerve fiber thicknesses were measured with an OCT (Optical coherence tomography) device. Littmann's formula (t = p × q × s) as modified by Bennett was applied to correct the magnification at the fundus camera imaging stage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The thickness of the nasal choroid (p=0.005; p=0.006), subfoveal choroid (p=0.004; p < 0.001) and temporal choroid (p=0.001; p=0.001) layers decreased as the DFD (Optic disc-to-foveal distance) increased in both right and left eyes of the individuals participating in the study, which was statistically significant. In addition, it was observed that the RNLF (Retinal nerve fiber layer) increased as the DFD distance increased, but this was not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrated that the optic disc-foveal distance, an anatomical measure of the fundus, does not affect RNLF in young and healthy subjects, but choroidal thickness does.</p>","PeriodicalId":12251,"journal":{"name":"Folia morphologica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Folia morphologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/fm.99985","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The optic disc-foveal distance is very important as it is an anatomical measure of the fundus. As this distance increases and the fundus tension, there may be variability in retinal and choroidal thickness. The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between optic disc-foveal distance and choroidal and retinal nerve fiber thickness in healthy subjects.

Materials and methods: A total of 72 people between the ages of 20-36 participated in the study. Optic disc-foveal distance was measured with a fundus camera and choroidal and retinal nerve fiber thicknesses were measured with an OCT (Optical coherence tomography) device. Littmann's formula (t = p × q × s) as modified by Bennett was applied to correct the magnification at the fundus camera imaging stage.

Results: The thickness of the nasal choroid (p=0.005; p=0.006), subfoveal choroid (p=0.004; p < 0.001) and temporal choroid (p=0.001; p=0.001) layers decreased as the DFD (Optic disc-to-foveal distance) increased in both right and left eyes of the individuals participating in the study, which was statistically significant. In addition, it was observed that the RNLF (Retinal nerve fiber layer) increased as the DFD distance increased, but this was not statistically significant.

Conclusion: This study demonstrated that the optic disc-foveal distance, an anatomical measure of the fundus, does not affect RNLF in young and healthy subjects, but choroidal thickness does.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
视盘-眼窝距离与脉络膜和视网膜神经纤维厚度的关系。
背景:视盘-眼窝距离非常重要,因为它是眼底的解剖测量值。随着该距离的增加和眼底张力的增加,视网膜和脉络膜厚度可能会出现变化。本研究旨在确定健康受试者的视盘-眼窝距离与脉络膜和视网膜神经纤维厚度之间的关系:共有 72 名年龄在 20-36 岁之间的人参加了研究。用眼底照相机测量视盘-眼窝距离,用光学相干断层扫描(OCT)设备测量脉络膜和视网膜神经纤维厚度。在眼底照相机成像阶段,应用经 Bennett 修正的 Littmann 公式(t = p × q × s)校正放大倍数:结果:在参与研究的左右眼中,鼻腔脉络膜(p=0.005;p=0.006)、眼底脉络膜(p=0.004;p <0.001)和颞脉络膜(p=0.001;p=0.001)层的厚度随着 DFD(视盘到眼窝的距离)的增加而减少,这在统计学上具有显著意义。此外,还观察到视网膜神经纤维层(RNLF)随着 DFD 距离的增加而增加,但这在统计学上没有意义:本研究表明,视盘-眼窝距离(一种眼底解剖学测量方法)不会影响年轻健康受试者的视网膜神经纤维层,但脉络膜厚度会影响视网膜神经纤维层。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Folia morphologica
Folia morphologica ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
218
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: "Folia Morphologica" is an official journal of the Polish Anatomical Society (a Constituent Member of European Federation for Experimental Morphology - EFEM). It contains original articles and reviews on morphology in the broadest sense (descriptive, experimental, and methodological). Papers dealing with practical application of morphological research to clinical problems may also be considered. Full-length papers as well as short research notes can be submitted. Descriptive papers dealing with non-mammals, cannot be accepted for publication with some exception.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of the efficacy of medial tarsal venous flaps and traditional venous/arterial free flaps in the reconstruction of hand soft tissue defects: a new type of physiological flap. A bilateral fetal origin of the posterior cerebral artery coexisting with an absent A1 segment of the anterior cerebral artery. Anatomical study of brachial plexuses of a koala, a Tasmanian devil, and a common ringtail possum. Is there a sexual dimorphism in Wormian bones presence? A study on Polish and Lithuanian sample. Lower limb interosseous membrane in foetuses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1