Variation in perceptions of genital ablation between aspiring eunuchs and individuals with paraphilic sexual fantasies.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Sexual Medicine Pub Date : 2024-06-09 eCollection Date: 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1093/sexmed/qfae038
Jamie Agapoff, Richard J Wassersug, Thomas W Johnson, Erik Wibowo
{"title":"Variation in perceptions of genital ablation between aspiring eunuchs and individuals with paraphilic sexual fantasies.","authors":"Jamie Agapoff, Richard J Wassersug, Thomas W Johnson, Erik Wibowo","doi":"10.1093/sexmed/qfae038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although uncommon, some individuals assigned male at birth (AMAB) seek voluntary genital ablative procedures, and others fantasize about it.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To learn more about the views of genital ablation and injuries in those who aspire to be castrated as compared with those who only fantasize about it.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey was run on the Eunuch Archive internet community. Content analysis was conducted on the responses of 342 AMAB individuals with castration fantasy but no desire for actual surgery (fantasizers) vs 294 AMAB individuals who expressed a desire for genital ablation (aspiring).</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>Study outcomes were responses to open-ended questions about genital ablations and injury.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Aspiring individuals were more likely to perceive a \"physical appearance benefit\" from orchiectomy, but fewer could recall how they first learned about the procedure. Some reasons that aspiring persons gave for desiring an orchiectomy included \"achieving preferred self\" and \"health reasons.\" Fantasizers, in contrast, worried about the potential side effects of orchiectomy, and more believed there to be no benefit to it.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>Psychiatrists and other clinicians need to understand their patients' views on genital ablation to properly diagnose and provide the best personalized care.</p><p><strong>Strengths and limitations: </strong>Strengths include a large sample of respondents. Limitations include the accuracy of the anonymous survey data.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrates divergent interests on genital ablation among AMAB individuals who have not had an any genital ablation yet have intense interest in the topic.</p>","PeriodicalId":21782,"journal":{"name":"Sexual Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11162831/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexual Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sexmed/qfae038","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although uncommon, some individuals assigned male at birth (AMAB) seek voluntary genital ablative procedures, and others fantasize about it.

Aim: To learn more about the views of genital ablation and injuries in those who aspire to be castrated as compared with those who only fantasize about it.

Methods: A survey was run on the Eunuch Archive internet community. Content analysis was conducted on the responses of 342 AMAB individuals with castration fantasy but no desire for actual surgery (fantasizers) vs 294 AMAB individuals who expressed a desire for genital ablation (aspiring).

Outcomes: Study outcomes were responses to open-ended questions about genital ablations and injury.

Results: Aspiring individuals were more likely to perceive a "physical appearance benefit" from orchiectomy, but fewer could recall how they first learned about the procedure. Some reasons that aspiring persons gave for desiring an orchiectomy included "achieving preferred self" and "health reasons." Fantasizers, in contrast, worried about the potential side effects of orchiectomy, and more believed there to be no benefit to it.

Clinical implications: Psychiatrists and other clinicians need to understand their patients' views on genital ablation to properly diagnose and provide the best personalized care.

Strengths and limitations: Strengths include a large sample of respondents. Limitations include the accuracy of the anonymous survey data.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates divergent interests on genital ablation among AMAB individuals who have not had an any genital ablation yet have intense interest in the topic.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
渴望成为太监的人和有变态性幻想的人对生殖器切除术的看法存在差异。
背景:目的:进一步了解渴望被阉割的人与仅幻想被阉割的人对生殖器阉割和伤害的看法:方法:在 "太监档案 "互联网社区进行了一项调查。对 342 名有阉割幻想但无实际手术愿望的 AMAB 患者(幻想者)与 294 名有生殖器消融愿望的 AMAB 患者(渴望者)的回答进行了内容分析:结果:研究结果是对有关生殖器消融术和伤害的开放式问题的回答:结果:渴望接受生殖器消融术的人更有可能从睾丸切除术中获得 "外貌上的好处",但较少有人能回忆起他们最初是如何了解到这种手术的。渴望进行睾丸切除术的人提出的一些理由包括 "实现理想的自我 "和 "健康原因"。相比之下,幻想者则担心睾丸切除术的潜在副作用,更多的人认为睾丸切除术没有任何好处:临床意义:精神科医生和其他临床医生需要了解患者对生殖器消融术的看法,以便正确诊断并提供最佳的个性化治疗:优势:受访者样本量大。局限性包括匿名调查数据的准确性:这项研究表明,尚未接受过任何生殖器消融术的亚美游人对生殖器消融术有着不同的兴趣,但他们对这一话题有着浓厚的兴趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sexual Medicine
Sexual Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
103
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊介绍: Sexual Medicine is an official publication of the International Society for Sexual Medicine, and serves the field as the peer-reviewed, open access journal for rapid dissemination of multidisciplinary clinical and basic research in all areas of global sexual medicine, and particularly acts as a venue for topics of regional or sub-specialty interest. The journal is focused on issues in clinical medicine and epidemiology but also publishes basic science papers with particular relevance to specific populations. Sexual Medicine offers clinicians and researchers a rapid route to publication and the opportunity to publish in a broadly distributed and highly visible global forum. The journal publishes high quality articles from all over the world and actively seeks submissions from countries with expanding sexual medicine communities. Sexual Medicine relies on the same expert panel of editors and reviewers as The Journal of Sexual Medicine and Sexual Medicine Reviews.
期刊最新文献
Translating and validating the gay affirmative practice scale for nurses in mainland China. A review of Peyronie's disease insurance coverage. Beyond conventional wisdom: unexplored risk factors for penile fracture. Clinical case of 45,X/46,XY mosaic male with ejaculatory disorder associated with seminal vesicle dysplasia: a case report. Female sexual dysfunctions in multiple sclerosis patients with lower urinary tract symptoms: an Italian case-control study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1