Jamie Agapoff, Richard J Wassersug, Thomas W Johnson, Erik Wibowo
{"title":"Variation in perceptions of genital ablation between aspiring eunuchs and individuals with paraphilic sexual fantasies.","authors":"Jamie Agapoff, Richard J Wassersug, Thomas W Johnson, Erik Wibowo","doi":"10.1093/sexmed/qfae038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although uncommon, some individuals assigned male at birth (AMAB) seek voluntary genital ablative procedures, and others fantasize about it.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To learn more about the views of genital ablation and injuries in those who aspire to be castrated as compared with those who only fantasize about it.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey was run on the Eunuch Archive internet community. Content analysis was conducted on the responses of 342 AMAB individuals with castration fantasy but no desire for actual surgery (fantasizers) vs 294 AMAB individuals who expressed a desire for genital ablation (aspiring).</p><p><strong>Outcomes: </strong>Study outcomes were responses to open-ended questions about genital ablations and injury.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Aspiring individuals were more likely to perceive a \"physical appearance benefit\" from orchiectomy, but fewer could recall how they first learned about the procedure. Some reasons that aspiring persons gave for desiring an orchiectomy included \"achieving preferred self\" and \"health reasons.\" Fantasizers, in contrast, worried about the potential side effects of orchiectomy, and more believed there to be no benefit to it.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>Psychiatrists and other clinicians need to understand their patients' views on genital ablation to properly diagnose and provide the best personalized care.</p><p><strong>Strengths and limitations: </strong>Strengths include a large sample of respondents. Limitations include the accuracy of the anonymous survey data.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrates divergent interests on genital ablation among AMAB individuals who have not had an any genital ablation yet have intense interest in the topic.</p>","PeriodicalId":21782,"journal":{"name":"Sexual Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11162831/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexual Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sexmed/qfae038","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Although uncommon, some individuals assigned male at birth (AMAB) seek voluntary genital ablative procedures, and others fantasize about it.
Aim: To learn more about the views of genital ablation and injuries in those who aspire to be castrated as compared with those who only fantasize about it.
Methods: A survey was run on the Eunuch Archive internet community. Content analysis was conducted on the responses of 342 AMAB individuals with castration fantasy but no desire for actual surgery (fantasizers) vs 294 AMAB individuals who expressed a desire for genital ablation (aspiring).
Outcomes: Study outcomes were responses to open-ended questions about genital ablations and injury.
Results: Aspiring individuals were more likely to perceive a "physical appearance benefit" from orchiectomy, but fewer could recall how they first learned about the procedure. Some reasons that aspiring persons gave for desiring an orchiectomy included "achieving preferred self" and "health reasons." Fantasizers, in contrast, worried about the potential side effects of orchiectomy, and more believed there to be no benefit to it.
Clinical implications: Psychiatrists and other clinicians need to understand their patients' views on genital ablation to properly diagnose and provide the best personalized care.
Strengths and limitations: Strengths include a large sample of respondents. Limitations include the accuracy of the anonymous survey data.
Conclusions: This study demonstrates divergent interests on genital ablation among AMAB individuals who have not had an any genital ablation yet have intense interest in the topic.
期刊介绍:
Sexual Medicine is an official publication of the International Society for Sexual Medicine, and serves the field as the peer-reviewed, open access journal for rapid dissemination of multidisciplinary clinical and basic research in all areas of global sexual medicine, and particularly acts as a venue for topics of regional or sub-specialty interest. The journal is focused on issues in clinical medicine and epidemiology but also publishes basic science papers with particular relevance to specific populations. Sexual Medicine offers clinicians and researchers a rapid route to publication and the opportunity to publish in a broadly distributed and highly visible global forum. The journal publishes high quality articles from all over the world and actively seeks submissions from countries with expanding sexual medicine communities. Sexual Medicine relies on the same expert panel of editors and reviewers as The Journal of Sexual Medicine and Sexual Medicine Reviews.