23Na MRI: inter-reader reproducibility of normal fibroglandular sodium concentration measurements at 3 T.

IF 3.7 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING European Radiology Experimental Pub Date : 2024-06-10 DOI:10.1186/s41747-024-00465-x
Otso Arponen, Mary A McLean, Muzna Nanaa, Roido Manavaki, Gabrielle C Baxter, Andrew B Gill, Frank Riemer, Aneurin J Kennerley, Ramona Woitek, Joshua D Kaggie, William J Brackenbury, Fiona J Gilbert
{"title":"<sup>23</sup>Na MRI: inter-reader reproducibility of normal fibroglandular sodium concentration measurements at 3 T.","authors":"Otso Arponen, Mary A McLean, Muzna Nanaa, Roido Manavaki, Gabrielle C Baxter, Andrew B Gill, Frank Riemer, Aneurin J Kennerley, Ramona Woitek, Joshua D Kaggie, William J Brackenbury, Fiona J Gilbert","doi":"10.1186/s41747-024-00465-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To study the reproducibility of <sup>23</sup>Na magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measurements from breast tissue in healthy volunteers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a dual-tuned bilateral <sup>23</sup>Na/<sup>1</sup>H breast coil at 3-T MRI, high-resolution <sup>23</sup>Na MRI three-dimensional cones sequences were used to quantify total sodium concentration (TSC) and fluid-attenuated sodium concentration (FASC). B<sub>1</sub>-corrected TSC and FASC maps were created. Two readers manually measured mean, minimum and maximum TSC and mean FASC values using two sampling methods: large regions of interest (LROIs) and small regions of interest (SROIs) encompassing fibroglandular tissue (FGT) and the highest signal area at the level of the nipple, respectively. The reproducibility of the measurements and correlations between density, age and FGT apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were evaluatedss.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine healthy volunteers were included. The inter-reader reproducibility of TSC and FASC using SROIs and LROIs was excellent (intraclass coefficient range 0.945-0.979, p < 0.001), except for the minimum TSC LROI measurements (p = 0.369). The mean/minimum LROI TSC and mean LROI FASC values were lower than the respective SROI values (p < 0.001); the maximum LROI TSC values were higher than the SROI TSC values (p = 0.009). TSC correlated inversely with age but not with FGT ADCs. The mean and maximum FGT TSC and FASC values were higher in dense breasts in comparison to non-dense breasts (p < 0.020).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The chosen sampling method and the selected descriptive value affect the measured TSC and FASC values, although the inter-reader reproducibility of the measurements is in general excellent.</p><p><strong>Relevance statement: </strong><sup>23</sup>Na MRI at 3 T allows the quantification of TSC and FASC sodium concentrations. The sodium measurements should be obtained consistently in a uniform manner.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>• <sup>23</sup>Na MRI allows the quantification of total and fluid-attenuated sodium concentrations (TSC/FASC). • Sampling method (large/small region of interest) affects the TSC and FASC values. • Dense breasts have higher TSC and FASC values than non-dense breasts. • The inter-reader reproducibility of TSC and FASC measurements was, in general, excellent. • The results suggest the importance of stratifying the sodium measurements protocol.</p>","PeriodicalId":36926,"journal":{"name":"European Radiology Experimental","volume":"8 1","pages":"75"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11162986/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Radiology Experimental","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41747-024-00465-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To study the reproducibility of 23Na magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measurements from breast tissue in healthy volunteers.

Methods: Using a dual-tuned bilateral 23Na/1H breast coil at 3-T MRI, high-resolution 23Na MRI three-dimensional cones sequences were used to quantify total sodium concentration (TSC) and fluid-attenuated sodium concentration (FASC). B1-corrected TSC and FASC maps were created. Two readers manually measured mean, minimum and maximum TSC and mean FASC values using two sampling methods: large regions of interest (LROIs) and small regions of interest (SROIs) encompassing fibroglandular tissue (FGT) and the highest signal area at the level of the nipple, respectively. The reproducibility of the measurements and correlations between density, age and FGT apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were evaluatedss.

Results: Nine healthy volunteers were included. The inter-reader reproducibility of TSC and FASC using SROIs and LROIs was excellent (intraclass coefficient range 0.945-0.979, p < 0.001), except for the minimum TSC LROI measurements (p = 0.369). The mean/minimum LROI TSC and mean LROI FASC values were lower than the respective SROI values (p < 0.001); the maximum LROI TSC values were higher than the SROI TSC values (p = 0.009). TSC correlated inversely with age but not with FGT ADCs. The mean and maximum FGT TSC and FASC values were higher in dense breasts in comparison to non-dense breasts (p < 0.020).

Conclusions: The chosen sampling method and the selected descriptive value affect the measured TSC and FASC values, although the inter-reader reproducibility of the measurements is in general excellent.

Relevance statement: 23Na MRI at 3 T allows the quantification of TSC and FASC sodium concentrations. The sodium measurements should be obtained consistently in a uniform manner.

Key points: 23Na MRI allows the quantification of total and fluid-attenuated sodium concentrations (TSC/FASC). • Sampling method (large/small region of interest) affects the TSC and FASC values. • Dense breasts have higher TSC and FASC values than non-dense breasts. • The inter-reader reproducibility of TSC and FASC measurements was, in general, excellent. • The results suggest the importance of stratifying the sodium measurements protocol.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
23Na 磁共振成像:在 3 T 下测量正常纤维腺体钠浓度的读数间再现性。
背景:研究健康志愿者乳腺组织 23Na 磁共振成像(MRI)测量结果的重现性:研究健康志愿者乳腺组织23Na磁共振成像(MRI)测量的重现性:方法:在 3-T 磁共振成像中使用双调谐双侧 23Na/1H 乳房线圈,利用高分辨率 23Na 磁共振成像三维锥形序列量化总钠浓度 (TSC) 和液体衰减钠浓度 (FASC)。绘制了 B1 校正 TSC 和 FASC 图。两名读片员使用两种取样方法手动测量 TSC 和 FASC 的平均值、最小值和最大值:大感兴趣区(LROIs)和小感兴趣区(SROIs),分别包括纤维腺组织(FGT)和乳头水平的最高信号区。对测量的重现性以及密度、年龄和 FGT 表观扩散系数(ADC)值之间的相关性进行了评估:结果:共纳入九名健康志愿者。使用 SROIs 和 LROIs 对 TSC 和 FASC 进行测量的读数间重现性非常好(类内系数范围为 0.945-0.979,P 结论):所选取样方法和所选描述值会影响 TSC 和 FASC 的测量值,尽管读数之间的测量重现性总体上非常好。钠的测量值应以一致的方式获得:- 23Na MRI 可量化总钠浓度和体液衰减钠浓度(TSC/FASC)。- 取样方法(感兴趣区大/小)会影响 TSC 和 FASC 值。- 致密乳房的 TSC 和 FASC 值高于非致密乳房。- 总体而言,TSC 和 FASC 测量值的读数间重现性非常好。- 结果表明,对钠测量方案进行分层非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Radiology Experimental
European Radiology Experimental Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
56
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
Assessment of the physiological effects and safety of transpulmonary chemoembolization with doxorubicin on pulmonary tissue using a human-isolated lung perfusion model. DSA-based perfusion parameters versus TICI score after mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischaemic stroke patients: a congruence analysis. Exploring the value of arterial spin labeling and six diffusion MRI models in differentiating solid benign and malignant renal tumors. Focal liver lesions: multiparametric microvasculature characterization via super-resolution ultrasound imaging. Fully automatic quantification of pulmonary fat attenuation volume by CT: an exploratory pilot study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1