Marieke P de Cock, Valérie O Baede, Helen J Esser, Manoj Fonville, Ankje de Vries, Willem F de Boer, Calvin Mehl, Rainer G Ulrich, Gereon Schares, Renate W Hakze-van der Honing, Wim H M van der Poel, Hein Sprong, Miriam Maas
{"title":"T(r)icky Environments: Higher Prevalence of Tick-Borne Zoonotic Pathogens in Rodents from Natural Areas Compared with Urban Areas.","authors":"Marieke P de Cock, Valérie O Baede, Helen J Esser, Manoj Fonville, Ankje de Vries, Willem F de Boer, Calvin Mehl, Rainer G Ulrich, Gereon Schares, Renate W Hakze-van der Honing, Wim H M van der Poel, Hein Sprong, Miriam Maas","doi":"10.1089/vbz.2023.0151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Urban areas are unique ecosystems with stark differences in species abundance and composition compared with natural ecosystems. These differences can affect pathogen transmission dynamics, thereby altering zoonotic pathogen prevalence and diversity. In this study, we screened small mammals from natural and urban areas in the Netherlands for up to 19 zoonotic pathogens, including viruses, bacteria, and protozoan parasites. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> In total, 578 small mammals were captured, including wood mice (<i>Apodemus sylvaticus</i>), bank voles (<i>Myodes glareolus</i>), yellow-necked mice (<i>Apodemus flavicollis</i>), house mice (<i>Mus musculus</i>), common voles (<i>Microtus arvalis</i>), and greater white-toothed shrews (<i>Crocidura russula</i>). We detected a wide variety of zoonotic pathogens in small mammals from both urban and natural areas. For a subset of these pathogens, in wood mice and bank voles, we then tested whether pathogen prevalence and diversity were associated with habitat type (<i>i.e.,</i> natural versus urban), degree of greenness, and various host characteristics. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The prevalence of tick-borne zoonotic pathogens (<i>Borrelia</i> spp. and <i>Neoehrlichia mikurensis</i>) was significantly higher in wood mice from natural areas. In contrast, the prevalence of <i>Bartonella</i> spp. was higher in wood mice from urban areas, but this difference was not statistically significant. Pathogen diversity was higher in bank voles from natural habitats and increased with body weight for both rodent species, although this relationship depended on sex for bank voles. In addition, we detected methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i>, extended-spectrum beta-lactamase/AmpC-producing <i>Escherichia coli</i>, and lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus for the first time in rodents in the Netherlands. <b><i>Discussion:</i></b> The differences between natural and urban areas are likely related to differences in the abundance and diversity of arthropod vectors and vertebrate community composition. With increasing environmental encroachment and changes in urban land use (<i>e.g.,</i> urban greening), it is important to better understand transmission dynamics of zoonotic pathogens in urban environments to reduce potential disease risks for public health.</p>","PeriodicalId":23683,"journal":{"name":"Vector borne and zoonotic diseases","volume":" ","pages":"478-488"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vector borne and zoonotic diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/vbz.2023.0151","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Urban areas are unique ecosystems with stark differences in species abundance and composition compared with natural ecosystems. These differences can affect pathogen transmission dynamics, thereby altering zoonotic pathogen prevalence and diversity. In this study, we screened small mammals from natural and urban areas in the Netherlands for up to 19 zoonotic pathogens, including viruses, bacteria, and protozoan parasites. Materials and Methods: In total, 578 small mammals were captured, including wood mice (Apodemus sylvaticus), bank voles (Myodes glareolus), yellow-necked mice (Apodemus flavicollis), house mice (Mus musculus), common voles (Microtus arvalis), and greater white-toothed shrews (Crocidura russula). We detected a wide variety of zoonotic pathogens in small mammals from both urban and natural areas. For a subset of these pathogens, in wood mice and bank voles, we then tested whether pathogen prevalence and diversity were associated with habitat type (i.e., natural versus urban), degree of greenness, and various host characteristics. Results: The prevalence of tick-borne zoonotic pathogens (Borrelia spp. and Neoehrlichia mikurensis) was significantly higher in wood mice from natural areas. In contrast, the prevalence of Bartonella spp. was higher in wood mice from urban areas, but this difference was not statistically significant. Pathogen diversity was higher in bank voles from natural habitats and increased with body weight for both rodent species, although this relationship depended on sex for bank voles. In addition, we detected methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, extended-spectrum beta-lactamase/AmpC-producing Escherichia coli, and lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus for the first time in rodents in the Netherlands. Discussion: The differences between natural and urban areas are likely related to differences in the abundance and diversity of arthropod vectors and vertebrate community composition. With increasing environmental encroachment and changes in urban land use (e.g., urban greening), it is important to better understand transmission dynamics of zoonotic pathogens in urban environments to reduce potential disease risks for public health.
期刊介绍:
Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases is an authoritative, peer-reviewed journal providing basic and applied research on diseases transmitted to humans by invertebrate vectors or non-human vertebrates. The Journal examines geographic, seasonal, and other risk factors that influence the transmission, diagnosis, management, and prevention of this group of infectious diseases, and identifies global trends that have the potential to result in major epidemics.
Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases coverage includes:
-Ecology
-Entomology
-Epidemiology
-Infectious diseases
-Microbiology
-Parasitology
-Pathology
-Public health
-Tropical medicine
-Wildlife biology
-Bacterial, rickettsial, viral, and parasitic zoonoses