Exploring undergraduate elder abuse education in nursing: a scoping review.

IF 0.8 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION Pub Date : 2024-06-09 DOI:10.1080/02701960.2024.2362749
Merav Ben Natan, Yelena Hazanov
{"title":"Exploring undergraduate elder abuse education in nursing: a scoping review.","authors":"Merav Ben Natan, Yelena Hazanov","doi":"10.1080/02701960.2024.2362749","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>One in six adults aged 60 and older experiences abuse annually, revealing a prevalence rate of 15.7%. However, knowledge gaps persist regarding the integration of elder abuse education into nursing curricula. The purpose of this scoping review is to fill the gap in understanding how elder abuse is currently taught to undergraduate nursing students, what methods are employed, and what impact these methods have on students' preparedness. A search across CINAHL, Google Scholar, Medline, and PubMed identified 10 relevant studies (2013-present) in English. These studies, encompassing 3,207 undergraduate nursing students, utilized diverse methodologies, focusing on undergraduate nursing education and elder abuse. Limited understanding of elder abuse among undergraduate nursing students is evident, primarily due to inadequate curriculum integration. Various teaching methods, including simulations and participative approaches, show promise in addressing this gap. This scoping review emphasizes the urgent need for enhanced elder abuse education in undergraduate nursing programs. The identified knowledge gap underscores the importance of active teaching methods, especially through simulation integration. Further research is essential to establish a robust evidence base in this critical area.</p>","PeriodicalId":46431,"journal":{"name":"GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02701960.2024.2362749","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One in six adults aged 60 and older experiences abuse annually, revealing a prevalence rate of 15.7%. However, knowledge gaps persist regarding the integration of elder abuse education into nursing curricula. The purpose of this scoping review is to fill the gap in understanding how elder abuse is currently taught to undergraduate nursing students, what methods are employed, and what impact these methods have on students' preparedness. A search across CINAHL, Google Scholar, Medline, and PubMed identified 10 relevant studies (2013-present) in English. These studies, encompassing 3,207 undergraduate nursing students, utilized diverse methodologies, focusing on undergraduate nursing education and elder abuse. Limited understanding of elder abuse among undergraduate nursing students is evident, primarily due to inadequate curriculum integration. Various teaching methods, including simulations and participative approaches, show promise in addressing this gap. This scoping review emphasizes the urgent need for enhanced elder abuse education in undergraduate nursing programs. The identified knowledge gap underscores the importance of active teaching methods, especially through simulation integration. Further research is essential to establish a robust evidence base in this critical area.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索护理专业本科虐老教育:范围界定审查。
在 60 岁及以上的成年人中,每年有六分之一的人遭受虐待,患病率为 15.7%。然而,在将虐待老人教育纳入护理课程方面仍存在知识空白。本范围综述旨在填补空白,了解目前如何向护理专业本科生教授虐待老人的知识、采用了哪些方法以及这些方法对学生的准备工作有何影响。通过对 CINAHL、谷歌学术、Medline 和 PubMed 的检索,我们发现了 10 项相关的英文研究(2013 年至今)。这些研究涉及 3207 名护理本科生,采用了不同的方法,重点关注护理本科教育和虐待老人问题。很明显,护理本科生对虐待老人的了解有限,这主要是由于课程整合不足。各种教学方法,包括模拟和参与式方法,都显示出解决这一问题的前景。本范围综述强调了在护理本科课程中加强虐老教育的迫切需要。已确定的知识差距强调了积极教学方法的重要性,尤其是通过模拟整合。进一步的研究对于在这一关键领域建立坚实的证据基础至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION
GERONTOLOGY & GERIATRICS EDUCATION EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
18.80%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: Gerontology & Geriatrics Education is geared toward the exchange of information related to research, curriculum development, course and program evaluation, classroom and practice innovation, and other topics with educational implications for gerontology and geriatrics. It is designed to appeal to a broad range of students, teachers, practitioners, administrators, and policy makers and is dedicated to improving awareness of best practices and resources for gerontologists and gerontology/geriatrics educators. Peer Review Policy: All research articles in this journal have undergone rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous refereeing by two anonymous referees.
期刊最新文献
Transforming perspectives on aging: educational, professional, and research innovations to address ageism. Geriatrics Connect: countering ageism in first-year medical students with longitudinal telephonic relationships. Developing a community advisory board to combat ageism: process and preliminary outcomes. Emeriti professors' perceptions: qualitative research exploring involvement in university activities. Factors related to benevolent and hostile ageism among paramedical students.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1