Effectiveness of Objective Structured Clinical Examinations and Standardized Patient Simulations for Increasing Learner Knowledge in Family Nurse Practitioner Education: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

IF 0.9 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Nursing Education Perspectives Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-08 DOI:10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000001280
Sean Sibley, Kelley Strout, Jennifer Bonnet
{"title":"Effectiveness of Objective Structured Clinical Examinations and Standardized Patient Simulations for Increasing Learner Knowledge in Family Nurse Practitioner Education: A Systematic Review of the Literature.","authors":"Sean Sibley, Kelley Strout, Jennifer Bonnet","doi":"10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000001280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the effectiveness of using objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs) and standardized patient (SP) simulations in family nurse practitioner (FNP) education to increase students' knowledge and skill competency.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Many programs use OSCE and SP simulation, but there is limited empirical data demonstrating their effectiveness for Kirkpatrick's level of learning.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A systematic search of published and unpublished literature was conducted in seven databases/registries in February 2023. Quantitative, experimental studies and quasi-experimental studies with comparison and explicit FNP learner population were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 4,442 records, zero studies met the inclusion criteria. Some studies with eligible designs investigated different populations (e.g., acute care nurse practitioner, prelicensure students).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The absence of included studies in this systematic review upholds the established need for continued investigation and can be used to support funding opportunities addressing this critical gap in nursing education science.</p>","PeriodicalId":47651,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Education Perspectives","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Education Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000001280","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the effectiveness of using objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs) and standardized patient (SP) simulations in family nurse practitioner (FNP) education to increase students' knowledge and skill competency.

Background: Many programs use OSCE and SP simulation, but there is limited empirical data demonstrating their effectiveness for Kirkpatrick's level of learning.

Method: A systematic search of published and unpublished literature was conducted in seven databases/registries in February 2023. Quantitative, experimental studies and quasi-experimental studies with comparison and explicit FNP learner population were included.

Results: Of 4,442 records, zero studies met the inclusion criteria. Some studies with eligible designs investigated different populations (e.g., acute care nurse practitioner, prelicensure students).

Conclusion: The absence of included studies in this systematic review upholds the established need for continued investigation and can be used to support funding opportunities addressing this critical gap in nursing education science.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
客观结构化临床考试和标准化病人模拟在家庭护士教育中增加学习者知识的有效性:文献系统回顾。
目的:本系统综述旨在评估在家庭执业护士(FNP)教育中使用客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)和标准化病人(SP)模拟来提高学生知识和技能能力的有效性:背景:许多课程都使用 OSCE 和 SP 模拟,但证明其对 Kirkpatrick 学习水平有效的实证数据有限:方法:2023 年 2 月,在七个数据库/登记处对已发表和未发表的文献进行了系统检索。结果:在 4,442 条记录中,0 条是针对柯克帕特里克学习水平的:在 4442 条记录中,有 0 项研究符合纳入标准。一些符合条件的研究调查了不同的人群(如急症护理执业护士、执业前学生):本系统综述没有纳入研究,这表明需要继续进行调查,并可用于支持解决护理教育科学中这一关键缺口的资助机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing Education Perspectives
Nursing Education Perspectives EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
197
期刊介绍: A publication of the National League for Nursing, Nursing Education Perspectives is a peer-reviewed, bimonthly journal that provides evidence for best practices in nursing education. Through the publication of rigorously designed studies, the journal contributes to the advancement of the science of nursing education. It serves as a forum for research and innovation regarding teaching and learning, curricula, technology, and other issues important to nursing education. Today, as nurse educators strive to advance research in nursing education and break away from established patterns and chart new pathways in nursing education, Nursing Education Perspectives is a vital resource. Nursing Education Perspectives is housed in the NLN Chamberlain College of Nursing for the Advancement of the Science of Nursing Education.
期刊最新文献
Simulation Utilized for Mentoring and Measuring Integrative Thinking: A Model for Advanced Practice Nurse Competence Evaluation. Revising Reflection Assignments to Align With Clinical Judgment Measurement Model Language: Maximizing Critical Thinking, Feedback, and Measurement in Simulation. Ready. Set. Game: Using Nursing Knowledge to Escape the Virtual Room in the Didactic Setting. Faculty-Librarian Collaboration to Enhance Information Literacy Skills in an Online Nursing Course. Telephone Triage Simulation in an Asynchronous Advanced Practice Nursing Course.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1