Imagining the future improves saving in preschoolers

IF 1.8 2区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL Journal of Experimental Child Psychology Pub Date : 2024-06-08 DOI:10.1016/j.jecp.2024.105966
Jinyi Zhang , Kathleen D. Vohs , Stephanie M. Carlson
{"title":"Imagining the future improves saving in preschoolers","authors":"Jinyi Zhang ,&nbsp;Kathleen D. Vohs ,&nbsp;Stephanie M. Carlson","doi":"10.1016/j.jecp.2024.105966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Preschoolers are notoriously poor at delaying gratification and saving limited resources, yet evidence-based methods of improving these behaviors are lacking. Using the marble game saving paradigm, we examined whether young children’s saving behavior would increase as a result of engaging in future-oriented imagination using a storyboard. Participants were 115 typically developing 4-year-olds from a midwestern U.S. metropolitan area (<em>M</em><sub>age</sub> = 53.48 months, <em>SD</em> = 4.14, range = 47–60; 54.8% female; 84.5% White; 7.3% Hispanic/Latino ethnicity; median annual household income = $150,000–$174,999). Children were randomly assigned to one of four storyboard conditions prior to the marble game: Positive Future Simulation, Negative Future Simulation, Positive Routine, or Negative Routine. In each condition, children were asked to imagine how they would feel in the future situation using a smiley face rating scale. Results showed that children were significantly more likely to save (and to save more marbles) in the experimental conditions compared with the control conditions (medium effect sizes). Moreover, imagining saving for the future (and how good that would feel) was more effective at increasing saving behaviors than imagining not saving (and how bad that would feel). Emotion ratings were consistent with the assigned condition, but positive emotion alone did not account for these effects. Results held after accounting for game order and verbal IQ. Implications of temporal psychological distancing and emotion anticipation for children’s future-oriented decision making are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48391,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Child Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Child Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022096524001061","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Preschoolers are notoriously poor at delaying gratification and saving limited resources, yet evidence-based methods of improving these behaviors are lacking. Using the marble game saving paradigm, we examined whether young children’s saving behavior would increase as a result of engaging in future-oriented imagination using a storyboard. Participants were 115 typically developing 4-year-olds from a midwestern U.S. metropolitan area (Mage = 53.48 months, SD = 4.14, range = 47–60; 54.8% female; 84.5% White; 7.3% Hispanic/Latino ethnicity; median annual household income = $150,000–$174,999). Children were randomly assigned to one of four storyboard conditions prior to the marble game: Positive Future Simulation, Negative Future Simulation, Positive Routine, or Negative Routine. In each condition, children were asked to imagine how they would feel in the future situation using a smiley face rating scale. Results showed that children were significantly more likely to save (and to save more marbles) in the experimental conditions compared with the control conditions (medium effect sizes). Moreover, imagining saving for the future (and how good that would feel) was more effective at increasing saving behaviors than imagining not saving (and how bad that would feel). Emotion ratings were consistent with the assigned condition, but positive emotion alone did not account for these effects. Results held after accounting for game order and verbal IQ. Implications of temporal psychological distancing and emotion anticipation for children’s future-oriented decision making are discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
想象未来能提高学龄前儿童的储蓄能力。
众所周知,学龄前儿童不善于延迟满足和节约有限的资源,但却缺乏改善这些行为的循证方法。我们使用弹珠游戏储蓄范例,研究了幼儿的储蓄行为是否会因为使用故事板进行面向未来的想象而增加。参与者是来自美国中西部都市地区的 115 名发育典型的 4 岁儿童(年龄 = 53.48 个月,SD = 4.14,范围 = 47-60;54.8% 为女性;84.5% 为白人;7.3% 为西班牙/拉丁美洲裔;家庭年收入中位数 = 150,000 美元-174,999 美元)。在弹珠游戏之前,孩子们被随机分配到四个故事板条件之一:积极未来模拟"、"消极未来模拟"、"积极常规 "或 "消极常规"。在每种情况下,儿童都被要求使用笑脸评分表想象他们在未来情况下的感受。结果显示,与对照组相比,实验组儿童储蓄的可能性明显更高(而且储蓄的弹珠更多)(中等效应大小)。此外,想象为未来储蓄(以及这种感觉有多好)比想象不储蓄(以及这种感觉有多糟)更能有效地增加储蓄行为。情绪评级与指定条件一致,但仅有积极情绪并不能解释这些效果。在考虑了游戏顺序和言语智商后,结果仍然成立。本文讨论了时间心理距离和情绪预期对儿童面向未来决策的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
190
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Child Psychology is an excellent source of information concerning all aspects of the development of children. It includes empirical psychological research on cognitive, social/emotional, and physical development. In addition, the journal periodically publishes Special Topic issues.
期刊最新文献
Examining the relationship between psychosocial adversity and inhibitory control: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study of children growing up in extreme poverty Out of sight, not out of mind: New pupillometric evidence on object permanence in a sample of 10- and 12-month-old German infants Culturally and linguistically diverse children’s retention of spoken narratives encoded in quiet and in babble noise Attention–language interface in Multilingual Assessment instrument for Narratives Perspective matters in goal-predictive gaze shifts during action observation: Results from 6-, 9-, and 12-month-olds and adults
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1