Exploring predictors of substance use disorder treatment engagement with machine learning: The impact of social determinants of health in the therapeutic landscape

David Eddie , John Prindle , Paul Somodi , Isaac Gerstmann , Bistra Dilkina , Shaddy K. Saba , Graham DiGuiseppi , Michael Dennis , Jordan P. Davis
{"title":"Exploring predictors of substance use disorder treatment engagement with machine learning: The impact of social determinants of health in the therapeutic landscape","authors":"David Eddie ,&nbsp;John Prindle ,&nbsp;Paul Somodi ,&nbsp;Isaac Gerstmann ,&nbsp;Bistra Dilkina ,&nbsp;Shaddy K. Saba ,&nbsp;Graham DiGuiseppi ,&nbsp;Michael Dennis ,&nbsp;Jordan P. Davis","doi":"10.1016/j.josat.2024.209435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Improved knowledge of factors that influence treatment engagement could help treatment providers and systems better engage patients. The present study used machine learning to explore associations between individual- and neighborhood-level factors, and SUD treatment engagement.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This was a secondary analysis of the Global Appraisal of Individual Needs (GAIN) dataset and United States Census Bureau data utilizing random forest machine learning and generalized linear mixed modelling. Our sample (<em>N</em> = 15,873) included all people entering SUD treatment at GAIN sites from 2006 to 2012. Predictors included an array of demographic, psychosocial, treatment-specific, and clinical measures, as well as environment-level measures for the neighborhood in which patients received treatment.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Greater odds of treatment engagement were predicted by adolescent age and psychiatric comorbidity, and at the neighborhood-level, by low unemployment and high population density. Lower odds of treatment engagement were predicted by Black/African American race, and at the neighborhood-level by high rate of public assistance and high income inequality. Regardless of the degree of treatment engagement, individuals receiving treatment in areas with high unemployment, alcohol sale outlet concentration, and poverty had greater substance use and related problems at baseline. Although these differences reduced with treatment and over time, disparities remained.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Neighborhood-level factors appear to play an important role in SUD treatment engagement. Regardless of whether individuals engage with treatment, greater loading on social determinants of health such as unemployment, alcohol sale outlet density, and poverty in the therapeutic landscape are associated with worse SUD treatment outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73960,"journal":{"name":"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949875924001474","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Improved knowledge of factors that influence treatment engagement could help treatment providers and systems better engage patients. The present study used machine learning to explore associations between individual- and neighborhood-level factors, and SUD treatment engagement.

Methods

This was a secondary analysis of the Global Appraisal of Individual Needs (GAIN) dataset and United States Census Bureau data utilizing random forest machine learning and generalized linear mixed modelling. Our sample (N = 15,873) included all people entering SUD treatment at GAIN sites from 2006 to 2012. Predictors included an array of demographic, psychosocial, treatment-specific, and clinical measures, as well as environment-level measures for the neighborhood in which patients received treatment.

Results

Greater odds of treatment engagement were predicted by adolescent age and psychiatric comorbidity, and at the neighborhood-level, by low unemployment and high population density. Lower odds of treatment engagement were predicted by Black/African American race, and at the neighborhood-level by high rate of public assistance and high income inequality. Regardless of the degree of treatment engagement, individuals receiving treatment in areas with high unemployment, alcohol sale outlet concentration, and poverty had greater substance use and related problems at baseline. Although these differences reduced with treatment and over time, disparities remained.

Conclusions

Neighborhood-level factors appear to play an important role in SUD treatment engagement. Regardless of whether individuals engage with treatment, greater loading on social determinants of health such as unemployment, alcohol sale outlet density, and poverty in the therapeutic landscape are associated with worse SUD treatment outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用机器学习探索药物使用障碍治疗参与度的预测因素:健康的社会决定因素对治疗环境的影响。
背景:更好地了解影响治疗参与度的因素有助于治疗机构和系统更好地吸引患者参与治疗。本研究利用机器学习来探索个人和社区层面的因素与 SUD 治疗参与度之间的关联:本研究利用随机森林机器学习和广义线性混合模型对全球个人需求评估(GAIN)数据集和美国人口普查局数据进行了二次分析。我们的样本(N = 15,873)包括 2006 年至 2012 年期间在 GAIN 站点接受 SUD 治疗的所有人。预测因素包括一系列人口统计学、社会心理学、治疗特异性和临床测量指标,以及患者接受治疗的社区环境水平测量指标:青少年年龄和精神疾病合并症以及低失业率和高人口密度在社区层面上预测了参与治疗的几率。黑人/非洲裔美国人的种族以及在邻里层面上的高公共援助率和高收入不平等则预示着参与治疗的几率较低。无论参与治疗的程度如何,在失业率高、酒类销售点集中和贫困地区接受治疗的个人,在基线时的药物使用和相关问题都更多。虽然随着治疗的进行和时间的推移,这些差异有所缩小,但差距依然存在:结论:邻里层面的因素似乎在参与 SUD 治疗中起着重要作用。无论个人是否参与治疗,治疗环境中失业、酒类销售点密度和贫困等健康社会决定因素的负荷越大,SDD 治疗结果越差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of substance use and addiction treatment
Journal of substance use and addiction treatment Biological Psychiatry, Neuroscience (General), Psychiatry and Mental Health, Psychology (General)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Parent SMART: Effects of residential treatment and an adjunctive parenting intervention on behavioral health services utilization. “Yeah, this is not going to work for me”–The impact of federal policy restrictions on methadone continuation upon release from jail or prison A community-academic partnership to develop an implementation support package for overdose prevention in permanent supportive housing Factors affecting problem-solving court team decisions about medications for opioid use disorder Is naloxone where it needs to be? Using spatial analytics to examine equitable distribution of community-based naloxone sites
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1