Relevance of meeting general outpatients' information needs to their perceptions of healthcare quality in a hospital in Ghana: a Healthcare Quality Survey using modified SERVQUAL analysis.

IF 1.3 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMJ Open Quality Pub Date : 2024-06-10 DOI:10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002683
Anita Ago Asare, Elom Otchi, Adom Manu
{"title":"Relevance of meeting general outpatients' information needs to their perceptions of healthcare quality in a hospital in Ghana: a Healthcare Quality Survey using modified SERVQUAL analysis.","authors":"Anita Ago Asare, Elom Otchi, Adom Manu","doi":"10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002683","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients determine quality of healthcare by their perception of the gap between the healthcare they experience/receive and that which they expect. This can be influenced by the ability of healthcare staff to adequately communicate information about the healthcare provided. This study assessed the level of relevance of meeting patients' information needs with respect to their assessment of healthcare quality in a private hospital's general outpatient department in Ghana.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Study design was cross-sectional using exit self-administered questionnaires among 390 outpatients. Healthcare quality was measured using a modified form of the Service Quality model gap analysis (gap between experience and expectations). A negative gap signifies unmet patient expectations. Microsoft Excel and Stata V.15.0 were used for analysis using t-test and multiple linear regression. A p value ≤0.05 denotes statistical significance.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The mean percentage of patients' expectations of quality of healthcare was 87.6% (SE 0.031), while patient experience was 86.0% (SE 0.029), with a significant negative gap of -0.08 (p<0.002). Their highest expectation of the quality of healthcare was for their information needs to be met, with a mean score of 4.44 (SE 0.03). Two of the four items under the information needs dimension that showed no statistically significant gaps were 'saying all their problems' (gap=0.00; p<0.9) and 'explanation of treatment/medications' (gap=0.01; p<0.6). Those with statistically significant negative gaps were 'explanation of investigations and procedures' (gap=-0.18; p<0.0001) and 'explanation of the diagnoses' (gap=-0.11; p<0.02), signifying unmet expectations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The outpatient's greatest need for quality healthcare in this study was for their information needs to be met. Providing information on patient diagnoses and investigations are the areas least likely to be adequately communicated to patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":9052,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Quality","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11168125/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002683","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients determine quality of healthcare by their perception of the gap between the healthcare they experience/receive and that which they expect. This can be influenced by the ability of healthcare staff to adequately communicate information about the healthcare provided. This study assessed the level of relevance of meeting patients' information needs with respect to their assessment of healthcare quality in a private hospital's general outpatient department in Ghana.

Design: Study design was cross-sectional using exit self-administered questionnaires among 390 outpatients. Healthcare quality was measured using a modified form of the Service Quality model gap analysis (gap between experience and expectations). A negative gap signifies unmet patient expectations. Microsoft Excel and Stata V.15.0 were used for analysis using t-test and multiple linear regression. A p value ≤0.05 denotes statistical significance.

Findings: The mean percentage of patients' expectations of quality of healthcare was 87.6% (SE 0.031), while patient experience was 86.0% (SE 0.029), with a significant negative gap of -0.08 (p<0.002). Their highest expectation of the quality of healthcare was for their information needs to be met, with a mean score of 4.44 (SE 0.03). Two of the four items under the information needs dimension that showed no statistically significant gaps were 'saying all their problems' (gap=0.00; p<0.9) and 'explanation of treatment/medications' (gap=0.01; p<0.6). Those with statistically significant negative gaps were 'explanation of investigations and procedures' (gap=-0.18; p<0.0001) and 'explanation of the diagnoses' (gap=-0.11; p<0.02), signifying unmet expectations.

Conclusions: The outpatient's greatest need for quality healthcare in this study was for their information needs to be met. Providing information on patient diagnoses and investigations are the areas least likely to be adequately communicated to patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
满足普通门诊患者的信息需求与他们对加纳一家医院医疗质量看法的相关性:使用改良的 SERVQUAL 分析法进行的医疗质量调查。
背景:患者根据他们所体验/接受的医疗服务与他们所期望的医疗服务之间的差距来判断医疗服务的质量。而医护人员能否充分传达有关所提供医疗服务的信息,则会对这一点产生影响。本研究评估了加纳一家私立医院普通门诊部在满足患者信息需求方面与患者医疗质量评估的相关程度:研究采用横断面设计,对 390 名门诊患者进行出口自填问卷调查。医疗质量采用服务质量模型差距分析(体验与期望之间的差距)的改进形式进行测量。负差距表示患者的期望未得到满足。使用 Microsoft Excel 和 Stata V.15.0 进行 t 检验和多元线性回归分析。P值≤0.05表示统计学意义:患者对医疗质量期望的平均百分比为 87.6%(SE 0.031),而患者体验的平均百分比为 86.0%(SE 0.029),两者之间存在显著的负差距-0.08(p结论:患者对医疗质量期望的平均百分比为 87.6%(SE 0.031),而患者体验的平均百分比为 86.0%(SE 0.029):在这项研究中,门诊患者对优质医疗服务的最大需求是满足他们对信息的需求。提供有关病人诊断和检查的信息是最不可能向病人充分传达的方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open Quality
BMJ Open Quality Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Combining quality improvement and critical care training: Evaluating an ICU CPR training programme quality improvement initiative at the National Hospital in Tanzania. Improving the non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS) pathway using quality improvement methodology. Achieving and sustaining reduction in hospital-acquired complications in an Australian local health service. Click and learn: a longitudinal interprofessional case-based sepsis education curriculum. Increasing the uptake of advance care directives through staff education and one-on-one support for people facing end-of-life.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1