Percutaneous Biliary Interventions via the Modified Hutson Loop in Patients with Biliary-Enteric Anastomoses: A Retrospective Study.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-10 DOI:10.1007/s00270-024-03778-x
Ali Husnain, Asad Malik, Juan Caicedo, Satish Nadig, Daniel Borja-Cacho, Justin Boike, Josh Levitsky, Allison Reiland, Bartley Thornburg, Rajesh Keswani, Muhammed Sufyaan Ebrahim Patel, Aziz Aadam, Riad Salem, Andres Duarte, Daniel Ganger, Ahsun Riaz
{"title":"Percutaneous Biliary Interventions via the Modified Hutson Loop in Patients with Biliary-Enteric Anastomoses: A Retrospective Study.","authors":"Ali Husnain, Asad Malik, Juan Caicedo, Satish Nadig, Daniel Borja-Cacho, Justin Boike, Josh Levitsky, Allison Reiland, Bartley Thornburg, Rajesh Keswani, Muhammed Sufyaan Ebrahim Patel, Aziz Aadam, Riad Salem, Andres Duarte, Daniel Ganger, Ahsun Riaz","doi":"10.1007/s00270-024-03778-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to present the institutional experience and algorithm for performing biliary interventions in liver transplant patients using the modified Hutson loop access (MHLA) and the impact of percutaneous endoscopy via the MHLA on these procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Over 13 years, 201 MHLA procedures were attempted on 52 patients (45 liver transplants; 24 living and 21 deceased donors) for diagnostic (e.g., cholangiography) and therapeutic (e.g., stent/drain insertion and cholangioplasty) purposes. The most common indications for MHLA were biliary strictures (60%) and bile leaks (23%). Percutaneous endoscopy was used to directly visualize the biliary-enteric anastomosis, diagnose pathology (e.g., ischemic cholangiopathy), and help in biliary hygiene (removing debris/casts/stones/stents) in 138/201 (69%) procedures. Technical success was defined as cannulating the biliary-enteric anastomosis and performing diagnostic/therapeutic procedure via the MHLA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The technical success rate was 95% (190/201). The failure rate among procedures performed with and without endoscopy was 2% (3/138) versus 13% (8/63) (P = 0.0024), and the need for new transhepatic access (to aid the procedure) was 12% (16/138) versus 30% (19/63) (P = 0.001). Despite endoscopy, failure in 2% of the cases resulted from inflamed/friable anastomosis (1/3) and high-grade stricture (2/3) obstructing retrograde cannulation of biliary-enteric anastomosis. Major adverse events (bowel perforation and injury) occurred in 1% of the procedures, with no procedure-related mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MHLA-based percutaneous biliary intervention is a safe and effective alternative to managing complications after liver transplant. Percutaneous endoscopy via the MHLA improves success rates and may reduce the need for new transhepatic access. Level of Evidence Level 4.</p>","PeriodicalId":9591,"journal":{"name":"CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-024-03778-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to present the institutional experience and algorithm for performing biliary interventions in liver transplant patients using the modified Hutson loop access (MHLA) and the impact of percutaneous endoscopy via the MHLA on these procedures.

Methods: Over 13 years, 201 MHLA procedures were attempted on 52 patients (45 liver transplants; 24 living and 21 deceased donors) for diagnostic (e.g., cholangiography) and therapeutic (e.g., stent/drain insertion and cholangioplasty) purposes. The most common indications for MHLA were biliary strictures (60%) and bile leaks (23%). Percutaneous endoscopy was used to directly visualize the biliary-enteric anastomosis, diagnose pathology (e.g., ischemic cholangiopathy), and help in biliary hygiene (removing debris/casts/stones/stents) in 138/201 (69%) procedures. Technical success was defined as cannulating the biliary-enteric anastomosis and performing diagnostic/therapeutic procedure via the MHLA.

Results: The technical success rate was 95% (190/201). The failure rate among procedures performed with and without endoscopy was 2% (3/138) versus 13% (8/63) (P = 0.0024), and the need for new transhepatic access (to aid the procedure) was 12% (16/138) versus 30% (19/63) (P = 0.001). Despite endoscopy, failure in 2% of the cases resulted from inflamed/friable anastomosis (1/3) and high-grade stricture (2/3) obstructing retrograde cannulation of biliary-enteric anastomosis. Major adverse events (bowel perforation and injury) occurred in 1% of the procedures, with no procedure-related mortality.

Conclusions: MHLA-based percutaneous biliary intervention is a safe and effective alternative to managing complications after liver transplant. Percutaneous endoscopy via the MHLA improves success rates and may reduce the need for new transhepatic access. Level of Evidence Level 4.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过改良 Hutson 环路对胆道-肠道吻合患者进行经皮胆道介入治疗:一项回顾性研究。
目的:本研究旨在介绍使用改良Hutson环路入路(MHLA)对肝移植患者进行胆道介入治疗的机构经验和算法,以及通过MHLA进行经皮内镜检查对这些手术的影响:13年来,对52名患者(45名肝移植患者;24名活体捐献者和21名死亡捐献者)进行了201次MHLA手术,用于诊断(如胆管造影)和治疗(如支架/引流管插入和胆管成形术)。胆道造影最常见的适应症是胆道狭窄(60%)和胆漏(23%)。在138/201例(69%)手术中,经皮内镜用于直接观察胆肠吻合口、诊断病理(如缺血性胆管病变)和帮助进行胆道卫生(清除碎屑/结块/石头/支架)。技术成功的定义是通过 MHLA 插管胆肠吻合并进行诊断/治疗:结果:技术成功率为 95%(190/201)。有内镜和无内镜手术的失败率分别为2%(3/138)和13%(8/63)(P = 0.0024),需要新的经肝通道(辅助手术)的比例分别为12%(16/138)和30%(19/63)(P = 0.001)。尽管进行了内镜检查,但仍有 2% 的病例因吻合口发炎/易裂(1/3)和高位狭窄(2/3)而失败,阻碍了胆肠吻合口的逆行插管。主要不良事件(肠穿孔和损伤)发生率为1%,无手术相关死亡率:结论:基于MHLA的经皮胆道介入治疗是治疗肝移植后并发症的一种安全有效的替代方法。结论:基于MHLA的经皮胆道介入治疗是治疗肝移植后并发症的一种安全有效的选择。通过MHLA进行经皮内镜检查可提高成功率,并可减少对新的经肝入路的需求。证据等级4级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
13.80%
发文量
306
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology (CVIR) is the official journal of the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe, and is also the official organ of a number of additional distinguished national and international interventional radiological societies. CVIR publishes double blinded peer-reviewed original research work including clinical and laboratory investigations, technical notes, case reports, works in progress, and letters to the editor, as well as review articles, pictorial essays, editorials, and special invited submissions in the field of vascular and interventional radiology. Beside the communication of the latest research results in this field, it is also the aim of CVIR to support continuous medical education. Articles that are accepted for publication are done so with the understanding that they, or their substantive contents, have not been and will not be submitted to any other publication.
期刊最新文献
Technical Considerations for Safety and Efficacy: Microballoon-Occluded Transcatheter Embolization Using n-butyl-2-Cyanoacrylate for Treatment of Pulmonary Arteriovenous Malformation Transpleural Inferior Phrenic Artery to Pulmonary Artery Fistula: An Increasingly Common and Important Vascular Anomaly Percutaneous Management of an Unstable Pathological Fracture of L5 Using Vertical Presacral Screw Fixation and Cementoplasty Non-perforating Temporary Diameter Reduction Ties for Physician-Modified Endografts Invited Commentary on using ChatGPT to Improve Readability of Interventional Radiology Procedure Descriptions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1