Prognostic impact of the number of resected pelvic nodes in endometrial cancer: Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group Study JGOG2043 post hoc analysis.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Journal of Gynecologic Oncology Pub Date : 2024-06-03 DOI:10.3802/jgo.2025.36.e3
Yosuke Konno, Michinori Mayama, Kazuhiro Takehara, Yoshihito Yokoyama, Jiro Suzuki, Nobuyuki Susumu, Kenichi Harano, Satoshi Nakagawa, Toru Nakanishi, Wataru Yamagami, Kosuke Yoshihara, Hiroyuki Nomura, Aikou Okamoto, Daisuke Aoki, Hidemichi Watari
{"title":"Prognostic impact of the number of resected pelvic nodes in endometrial cancer: Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group Study JGOG2043 post hoc analysis.","authors":"Yosuke Konno, Michinori Mayama, Kazuhiro Takehara, Yoshihito Yokoyama, Jiro Suzuki, Nobuyuki Susumu, Kenichi Harano, Satoshi Nakagawa, Toru Nakanishi, Wataru Yamagami, Kosuke Yoshihara, Hiroyuki Nomura, Aikou Okamoto, Daisuke Aoki, Hidemichi Watari","doi":"10.3802/jgo.2025.36.e3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to determine whether the number of resected pelvic lymph nodes (PLNs) affects the prognosis of endometrial cancer (EC) patients at post-operative risk of recurrence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>JGOG2043 was a randomized controlled trial to assess the efficacy of three chemotherapeutic regimens as adjuvant therapy in EC patients with post-operative recurrent risk. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 250 patients who underwent pelvic lymphadenectomy alone in JGOG2043. The number of resected and positive nodes and other clinicopathologic risk factors for survival were retrieved.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 83 patients in the group with less than 20 PLNs removed (group A), while 167 patients had 20 or more PLNs removed (group B). There was no significant difference in patients' backgrounds between the two groups, and the rate of lymph node metastasis was not significantly different. There was a trend toward fewer pelvic recurrences in group B compared with group A (3.5% vs. 9.6%; p=0.050). Although Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no statistically significant difference in survival rates between the two groups (5-year overall survival [OS]=90.3% vs. 84.3%; p=0.199), multivariate analysis revealed that resection of 20 or more nodes is one of the independent prognostic factors (hazard ratio=0.49; 95% confidence interval=0.24-0.99; p=0.048), as well as surgical stage, high-risk histology, and advanced age for OS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Resection of 20 or more PLNs was associated with improved pelvic control and better survival outcomes in EC patients at risk of recurrence who underwent pelvic lymphadenectomy alone and were treated with adjuvant chemotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":15868,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gynecologic Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gynecologic Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2025.36.e3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to determine whether the number of resected pelvic lymph nodes (PLNs) affects the prognosis of endometrial cancer (EC) patients at post-operative risk of recurrence.

Methods: JGOG2043 was a randomized controlled trial to assess the efficacy of three chemotherapeutic regimens as adjuvant therapy in EC patients with post-operative recurrent risk. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 250 patients who underwent pelvic lymphadenectomy alone in JGOG2043. The number of resected and positive nodes and other clinicopathologic risk factors for survival were retrieved.

Results: There were 83 patients in the group with less than 20 PLNs removed (group A), while 167 patients had 20 or more PLNs removed (group B). There was no significant difference in patients' backgrounds between the two groups, and the rate of lymph node metastasis was not significantly different. There was a trend toward fewer pelvic recurrences in group B compared with group A (3.5% vs. 9.6%; p=0.050). Although Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no statistically significant difference in survival rates between the two groups (5-year overall survival [OS]=90.3% vs. 84.3%; p=0.199), multivariate analysis revealed that resection of 20 or more nodes is one of the independent prognostic factors (hazard ratio=0.49; 95% confidence interval=0.24-0.99; p=0.048), as well as surgical stage, high-risk histology, and advanced age for OS.

Conclusion: Resection of 20 or more PLNs was associated with improved pelvic control and better survival outcomes in EC patients at risk of recurrence who underwent pelvic lymphadenectomy alone and were treated with adjuvant chemotherapy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
切除盆腔结节数量对子宫内膜癌预后的影响:日本妇科肿瘤集团研究 JGOG2043 的事后分析。
目的:本研究旨在确定切除的盆腔淋巴结(PLN)数量是否会影响有术后复发风险的子宫内膜癌患者的预后:本研究旨在确定切除盆腔淋巴结(PLN)的数量是否会影响有术后复发风险的子宫内膜癌(EC)患者的预后:JGOG2043是一项随机对照试验,旨在评估三种化疗方案对有术后复发风险的子宫内膜癌患者的辅助治疗效果。我们对在JGOG2043中单独接受盆腔淋巴结切除术的250名患者进行了回顾性分析。检索了切除和阳性结节的数量以及影响生存的其他临床病理学风险因素:切除的淋巴结少于 20 个的一组有 83 例(A 组),而切除的淋巴结达到或超过 20 个的一组有 167 例(B 组)。两组患者的背景无明显差异,淋巴结转移率也无明显差异。与 A 组相比,B 组盆腔复发率呈下降趋势(3.5% 对 9.6%;P=0.050)。虽然卡普兰-梅耶尔分析显示两组患者的生存率无统计学差异(5年总生存率[OS]=90.3% vs. 84.3%;P=0.199),但多变量分析显示,切除20个或更多结节是影响OS的独立预后因素之一(危险比=0.49;95%置信区间=0.24-0.99;P=0.048),手术分期、高危组织学和高龄也是影响OS的独立预后因素:结论:对于单独接受盆腔淋巴结切除术并接受辅助化疗的有复发风险的EC患者,切除20个或更多PLN与盆腔控制的改善和更好的生存结果有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology ONCOLOGY-OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.60%
发文量
84
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Gynecologic Oncology (JGO) is an official publication of the Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology. Abbreviated title is ''J Gynecol Oncol''. It was launched in 1990. The JGO''s aim is to publish the highest quality manuscripts dedicated to the advancement of care of the patients with gynecologic cancer. It is an international peer-reviewed periodical journal that is published bimonthly (January, March, May, July, September, and November). Supplement numbers are at times published. The journal publishes editorials, original and review articles, correspondence, book review, etc.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of clinical usefulness of HPV-16 and HPV-18 genotyping for cervical cancer screening. Influence of cancer in pregnancy on obstetric and neonatal outcomes: an observational retrospective cohort study. Chemotherapy response score no longer predicts survival outcomes in high-grade serous ovarian cancer patients with BRCA mutation and/or maintenance therapy. The prognostic significance of primary tumor site in vulvar cancer: a population-based cohort study. Genetic analysis of cervical cancer with lymph node metastasis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1