Clinical research text summarization method based on fusion of domain knowledge

IF 4 2区 医学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Journal of Biomedical Informatics Pub Date : 2024-06-08 DOI:10.1016/j.jbi.2024.104668
Shiwei Jiang , Qingxiao Zheng , Taiyong Li , Shuanghong Luo
{"title":"Clinical research text summarization method based on fusion of domain knowledge","authors":"Shiwei Jiang ,&nbsp;Qingxiao Zheng ,&nbsp;Taiyong Li ,&nbsp;Shuanghong Luo","doi":"10.1016/j.jbi.2024.104668","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The objective of this study is to integrate PICO knowledge into the clinical research text summarization process, aiming to enhance the model’s comprehension of biomedical texts while capturing crucial content from the perspective of summary readers, ultimately improving the quality of summaries.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We propose a clinical research text summarization method called DKGE-PEGASUS (Domain-Knowledge and Graph Convolutional Enhanced PEGASUS), which is based on integrating domain knowledge. The model mainly consists of three components: a PICO label prediction module, a text information re-mining unit based on Graph Convolutional Neural Networks (GCN), and a pre-trained summarization model. First, the PICO label prediction module is used to identify PICO elements in clinical research texts while obtaining word embeddings enriched with PICO knowledge. Then, we use GCN to reinforce the encoder of the pre-trained summarization model to achieve deeper text information mining while explicitly injecting PICO knowledge. Finally, the outputs of the PICO label prediction module, the GCN text information re-mining unit, and the encoder of the pre-trained model are fused to produce the final coding results, which are then decoded by the decoder to generate summaries.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Experiments conducted on two datasets, PubMed and CDSR, demonstrated the effectiveness of our method. The Rouge-1 scores achieved were 42.64 and 38.57, respectively. Furthermore, the quality of our summarization results was found to significantly outperform the baseline model in comparisons of summarization results for a segment of biomedical text.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The method proposed in this paper is better equipped to identify critical elements in clinical research texts and produce a higher-quality summary.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15263,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biomedical Informatics","volume":"156 ","pages":"Article 104668"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biomedical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1532046424000868","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The objective of this study is to integrate PICO knowledge into the clinical research text summarization process, aiming to enhance the model’s comprehension of biomedical texts while capturing crucial content from the perspective of summary readers, ultimately improving the quality of summaries.

Methods

We propose a clinical research text summarization method called DKGE-PEGASUS (Domain-Knowledge and Graph Convolutional Enhanced PEGASUS), which is based on integrating domain knowledge. The model mainly consists of three components: a PICO label prediction module, a text information re-mining unit based on Graph Convolutional Neural Networks (GCN), and a pre-trained summarization model. First, the PICO label prediction module is used to identify PICO elements in clinical research texts while obtaining word embeddings enriched with PICO knowledge. Then, we use GCN to reinforce the encoder of the pre-trained summarization model to achieve deeper text information mining while explicitly injecting PICO knowledge. Finally, the outputs of the PICO label prediction module, the GCN text information re-mining unit, and the encoder of the pre-trained model are fused to produce the final coding results, which are then decoded by the decoder to generate summaries.

Results

Experiments conducted on two datasets, PubMed and CDSR, demonstrated the effectiveness of our method. The Rouge-1 scores achieved were 42.64 and 38.57, respectively. Furthermore, the quality of our summarization results was found to significantly outperform the baseline model in comparisons of summarization results for a segment of biomedical text.

Conclusion

The method proposed in this paper is better equipped to identify critical elements in clinical research texts and produce a higher-quality summary.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于领域知识融合的临床研究文本摘要方法。
研究目的本研究的目的是将 PICO 知识整合到临床研究文本摘要过程中,旨在增强模型对生物医学文本的理解能力,同时从摘要读者的角度捕捉关键内容,最终提高摘要的质量:我们提出了一种名为 DKGE-PEGASUS (领域知识与图卷积增强 PEGASUS)的临床研究文本摘要方法,该方法以整合领域知识为基础。该模型主要由三个部分组成:PICO 标签预测模块、基于图卷积神经网络(GCN)的文本信息再挖掘单元和预训练摘要模型。首先,PICO 标签预测模块用于识别临床研究文本中的 PICO 要素,同时获得富含 PICO 知识的词嵌入。然后,我们使用 GCN 来加强预训练摘要模型的编码器,以实现更深入的文本信息挖掘,同时明确注入 PICO 知识。最后,融合 PICO 标签预测模块、GCN 文本信息再挖掘单元和预训练模型编码器的输出结果,生成最终编码结果,然后由解码器解码生成摘要:在 PubMed 和 CDSR 两个数据集上进行的实验证明了我们方法的有效性。所获得的 Rouge-1 分数分别为 42.64 和 38.57。此外,在一段生物医学文本的摘要结果比较中,我们的摘要结果质量明显优于基线模型:本文提出的方法能更好地识别临床研究文本中的关键要素,并生成更高质量的摘要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
Journal of Biomedical Informatics 医学-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
243
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Biomedical Informatics reflects a commitment to high-quality original research papers, reviews, and commentaries in the area of biomedical informatics methodology. Although we publish articles motivated by applications in the biomedical sciences (for example, clinical medicine, health care, population health, and translational bioinformatics), the journal emphasizes reports of new methodologies and techniques that have general applicability and that form the basis for the evolving science of biomedical informatics. Articles on medical devices; evaluations of implemented systems (including clinical trials of information technologies); or papers that provide insight into a biological process, a specific disease, or treatment options would generally be more suitable for publication in other venues. Papers on applications of signal processing and image analysis are often more suitable for biomedical engineering journals or other informatics journals, although we do publish papers that emphasize the information management and knowledge representation/modeling issues that arise in the storage and use of biological signals and images. System descriptions are welcome if they illustrate and substantiate the underlying methodology that is the principal focus of the report and an effort is made to address the generalizability and/or range of application of that methodology. Note also that, given the international nature of JBI, papers that deal with specific languages other than English, or with country-specific health systems or approaches, are acceptable for JBI only if they offer generalizable lessons that are relevant to the broad JBI readership, regardless of their country, language, culture, or health system.
期刊最新文献
Early multi-cancer detection through deep learning: An anomaly detection approach using Variational Autoencoder. Importance of variables from different time frames for predicting self-harm using health system data Cross-Modal self-supervised vision language pre-training with multiple objectives for medical visual question answering Machine learning approaches for the discovery of clinical pathways from patient data: A systematic review MultiADE: A Multi-domain benchmark for Adverse Drug Event extraction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1