Improving Care Beyond Birth: A Qualitative Study of Postpartum Care After High-Risk Pregnancy.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of women's health Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-11 DOI:10.1089/jwh.2024.0108
Sara E K Phillips, Ann C Celi, Judy Margo, Alexandra Wehbe, Ami Karlage, Chloe A Zera
{"title":"Improving Care Beyond Birth: A Qualitative Study of Postpartum Care After High-Risk Pregnancy.","authors":"Sara E K Phillips, Ann C Celi, Judy Margo, Alexandra Wehbe, Ami Karlage, Chloe A Zera","doi":"10.1089/jwh.2024.0108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> The postpartum period is a window to engage birthing people in their long-term health and facilitate connections to comprehensive care. However, postpartum systems often fail to transition high-risk patients from obstetric to primary care. Exploring patient experiences can be helpful for optimizing systems of postpartum care. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> This is a qualitative study of high-risk pregnant and postpartum individuals. We conducted in-depth interviews with 20 high-risk pregnant or postpartum people. Interviews explored personal experiences of postpartum care planning, coordination of care between providers, and patients' perception of ideal care transitions. We performed thematic analysis using the <i>Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, Behavior</i> (COM-B) model of behavior change as a framework. COM-B allowed for a formal structure to assess participants' ability to access postpartum care and primary care reengagement after delivery. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Participants universally identified difficulty accessing primary care in the postpartum period, with the most frequently reported barriers being lack of knowledge and supportive environments. Insufficient preparation, inadequate prenatal counseling, and lack of standardized care transitions were the most significant barriers to primary care reengagement. Participants who most successfully engaged in primary care had postpartum care plans, coordination between obstetric and primary care, and access to material resources. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> High-risk postpartum individuals do not receive effective counseling on the importance of primary care engagement after delivery. System-level challenges and lack of care coordination also hinder access to primary care. Future interventions should include prenatal education on the benefits of primary care follow-up, structured postpartum planning, and system-level improvements in obstetric and primary care provider communication.</p>","PeriodicalId":17636,"journal":{"name":"Journal of women's health","volume":" ","pages":"1720-1729"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of women's health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2024.0108","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The postpartum period is a window to engage birthing people in their long-term health and facilitate connections to comprehensive care. However, postpartum systems often fail to transition high-risk patients from obstetric to primary care. Exploring patient experiences can be helpful for optimizing systems of postpartum care. Methods: This is a qualitative study of high-risk pregnant and postpartum individuals. We conducted in-depth interviews with 20 high-risk pregnant or postpartum people. Interviews explored personal experiences of postpartum care planning, coordination of care between providers, and patients' perception of ideal care transitions. We performed thematic analysis using the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation, Behavior (COM-B) model of behavior change as a framework. COM-B allowed for a formal structure to assess participants' ability to access postpartum care and primary care reengagement after delivery. Results: Participants universally identified difficulty accessing primary care in the postpartum period, with the most frequently reported barriers being lack of knowledge and supportive environments. Insufficient preparation, inadequate prenatal counseling, and lack of standardized care transitions were the most significant barriers to primary care reengagement. Participants who most successfully engaged in primary care had postpartum care plans, coordination between obstetric and primary care, and access to material resources. Conclusions: High-risk postpartum individuals do not receive effective counseling on the importance of primary care engagement after delivery. System-level challenges and lack of care coordination also hinder access to primary care. Future interventions should include prenatal education on the benefits of primary care follow-up, structured postpartum planning, and system-level improvements in obstetric and primary care provider communication.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改善分娩后的护理:高危妊娠产后护理定性研究》。
背景:产后时期是让分娩者参与其长期健康并促进与综合护理联系的一个窗口。然而,产后护理系统往往无法将高风险患者从产科护理过渡到初级护理。探索患者的经历有助于优化产后护理系统。方法:这是一项针对高危孕妇和产后患者的定性研究。我们对 20 名高风险孕妇或产后人士进行了深入访谈。访谈探讨了产后护理计划的个人经历、医疗服务提供者之间的护理协调以及患者对理想护理过渡的看法。我们以行为改变的能力、机会、动机、行为(COM-B)模型为框架进行了主题分析。能力、机会、动机、行为(COM-B)模型为评估参与者获得产后护理和产后重新参与初级保健的能力提供了一个正式的结构。结果:参与者普遍认为在产后难以获得初级保健服务,最常见的障碍是缺乏知识和支持性环境。准备不足、产前咨询不充分以及缺乏标准化的护理过渡是重新参与初级保健的最大障碍。最成功参与初级保健的参与者拥有产后护理计划、产科和初级保健之间的协调以及获得物质资源的途径。结论:产后高危人群没有得到关于产后参与初级保健重要性的有效咨询。系统层面的挑战和缺乏护理协调也阻碍了人们获得初级保健服务。未来的干预措施应包括产前关于初级保健随访益处的教育、有条理的产后规划,以及从系统层面改善产科和初级保健提供者之间的沟通。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of women's health
Journal of women's health 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
5.70%
发文量
197
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Women''s Health is the primary source of information for meeting the challenges of providing optimal health care for women throughout their lifespan. The Journal delivers cutting-edge advancements in diagnostic procedures, therapeutic protocols for the management of diseases, and innovative research in gender-based biology that impacts patient care and treatment. Journal of Women’s Health coverage includes: -Internal Medicine Endocrinology- Cardiology- Oncology- Obstetrics/Gynecology- Urogynecology- Psychiatry- Neurology- Nutrition- Sex-Based Biology- Complementary Medicine- Sports Medicine- Surgery- Medical Education- Public Policy.
期刊最新文献
Price and Prejudice: Reimbursement of Surgical Care on Male Versus Female Anatomies. Education About Breast Density Does Not Improve Screening Adherence Among Racial and Ethnic Minority Women. Effectiveness of Breast Density Educational Interventions on Mammography Screening Adherence Among Underserved Latinas: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Diagnostic Performance of a Type III Portable Monitoring Device for Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Pregnant Women: A Prospective Validation Study. Pathways from Adverse Childhood Family Environment to Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms and Impact Among Women.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1