A Systematic Review of Adaptive Seamless Clinical Trials for Late-Phase Oncology Development.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-11 DOI:10.1007/s43441-024-00670-1
Kristine Broglio, Freda Cooner, Yujun Wu, Mike Xiao, X Q Xue, Marina Lowen, Izuagie Ikhapoh, Philip He
{"title":"A Systematic Review of Adaptive Seamless Clinical Trials for Late-Phase Oncology Development.","authors":"Kristine Broglio, Freda Cooner, Yujun Wu, Mike Xiao, X Q Xue, Marina Lowen, Izuagie Ikhapoh, Philip He","doi":"10.1007/s43441-024-00670-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Although oncology has seen large scientific and clinical advances over the last decade, it also has one of the lowest success rates for novel agents across therapeutic areas. Adaptive clinical trial design has been a popular option for increasing clinical trial efficiency and the chances of trial success. Seamless clinical trial design are studies in which two or more clinical trial phases are combined into a single study with a pre-specified transition between stages. This integration of phases may enhance efficiency.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To understand the precedent for the use of seamless designs, this working group was formed to conduct a comprehensive literature search on seamless clinical trials conducted with confirmatory intent in oncology. Trial design features were extracted into a database and analyzed with descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A literature search identified 68 clinical trials meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria. The most common design feature was a gate on treatment efficacy, where the trial would only proceed to the second stage if sufficient efficacy was observed in the first. The next most common feature was a selection of a dose or treatment regimen. Inferentially and operationally seamless designs were approximately equally represented.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Key statistical considerations for seamless phase II/III designs include optimizing design choices by evaluating and comparing operating characteristics across design alternatives as well as showing control of overall Type I error rates. Executing the transition between phases should be evaluated for issues related to accrual, drug production, and procedures to maintain trial integrity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While there are unique statistical, regulatory, and operational considerations for seamless designs they are also uniquely suited to many development settings. These include, for example, addressing dose selection under FDA's Project Optimus and addressing the growing use of biomarkers and personalized medicine approaches in cancer treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":23084,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-024-00670-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Although oncology has seen large scientific and clinical advances over the last decade, it also has one of the lowest success rates for novel agents across therapeutic areas. Adaptive clinical trial design has been a popular option for increasing clinical trial efficiency and the chances of trial success. Seamless clinical trial design are studies in which two or more clinical trial phases are combined into a single study with a pre-specified transition between stages. This integration of phases may enhance efficiency.

Methods: To understand the precedent for the use of seamless designs, this working group was formed to conduct a comprehensive literature search on seamless clinical trials conducted with confirmatory intent in oncology. Trial design features were extracted into a database and analyzed with descriptive statistics.

Results: A literature search identified 68 clinical trials meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria. The most common design feature was a gate on treatment efficacy, where the trial would only proceed to the second stage if sufficient efficacy was observed in the first. The next most common feature was a selection of a dose or treatment regimen. Inferentially and operationally seamless designs were approximately equally represented.

Discussion: Key statistical considerations for seamless phase II/III designs include optimizing design choices by evaluating and comparing operating characteristics across design alternatives as well as showing control of overall Type I error rates. Executing the transition between phases should be evaluated for issues related to accrual, drug production, and procedures to maintain trial integrity.

Conclusions: While there are unique statistical, regulatory, and operational considerations for seamless designs they are also uniquely suited to many development settings. These include, for example, addressing dose selection under FDA's Project Optimus and addressing the growing use of biomarkers and personalized medicine approaches in cancer treatment.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肿瘤学后期发展的自适应无缝临床试验系统性回顾。
导言:尽管肿瘤学在过去十年中取得了巨大的科学和临床进步,但它也是所有治疗领域中新型药物成功率最低的领域之一。自适应临床试验设计一直是提高临床试验效率和试验成功几率的热门选择。无缝临床试验设计是指将两个或两个以上的临床试验阶段合并为一项研究,并预先规定阶段之间的过渡。这种阶段整合可提高效率:为了了解使用无缝设计的先例,我们成立了本工作组,对肿瘤学领域以确证为目的的无缝临床试验进行了全面的文献检索。将试验设计特点提取到数据库中,并进行描述性统计分析:文献检索发现了 68 项符合纳入和排除标准的临床试验。最常见的设计特征是疗效关,即只有在第一阶段观察到足够的疗效,试验才会进入第二阶段。其次最常见的特征是选择剂量或治疗方案。推断无缝设计和操作无缝设计的比例大致相当:讨论:II/III 期无缝设计的主要统计考虑因素包括通过评估和比较不同设计方案的操作特征来优化设计选择,以及显示对总体 I 类错误率的控制。应评估与应计制、药物生产和程序有关的问题,以保持试验的完整性:虽然无缝设计在统计、监管和操作方面有其独特的考虑因素,但它们也非常适合许多开发环境。例如,根据 FDA 的 Optimus 项目解决剂量选择问题,以及解决癌症治疗中越来越多地使用生物标记物和个性化医疗方法的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science MEDICAL INFORMATICS-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
13.30%
发文量
127
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science (TIRS) is the official scientific journal of DIA that strives to advance medical product discovery, development, regulation, and use through the publication of peer-reviewed original and review articles, commentaries, and letters to the editor across the spectrum of converting biomedical science into practical solutions to advance human health. The focus areas of the journal are as follows: Biostatistics Clinical Trials Product Development and Innovation Global Perspectives Policy Regulatory Science Product Safety Special Populations
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Product Features and Clinical Trial Designs for the DTx Products with the Indication of Insomnia Authorized by Regulatory Authorities. A Framework for the Use and Likelihood of Regulatory Acceptance of Single-Arm Trials Correction: Advanced Regenerative Medicines for Rare Diseases: A Review of Industry Sponsors Investment Motivations. Latest Developments in “Adaptive Enrichment” Clinical Trial Designs in Oncology Advanced Regenerative Medicines for Rare Diseases: A Review of Industry Sponsors Investment Motivations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1