Clinicopathological features and cancer transcriptomic profiling of poorly cohesive gastric carcinoma subtypes

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 PATHOLOGY Journal of Pathology Clinical Research Pub Date : 2024-06-11 DOI:10.1002/2056-4538.12387
Hung-Hsuan Yen, Pin-Yu Chen, Ruby Yun-Ju Huang, Jung-Ming Jeng, I-Rue Lai
{"title":"Clinicopathological features and cancer transcriptomic profiling of poorly cohesive gastric carcinoma subtypes","authors":"Hung-Hsuan Yen,&nbsp;Pin-Yu Chen,&nbsp;Ruby Yun-Ju Huang,&nbsp;Jung-Ming Jeng,&nbsp;I-Rue Lai","doi":"10.1002/2056-4538.12387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Gastric poorly cohesive carcinoma (PCC) manifests with a diffuse pattern and diverse tumor cell morphologies, often indicating a more unfavorable prognosis. Recent consensus has reclassified PCC based on the proportion of signet-ring cells (SRCs) in tumors for research purposes. The two most distinct subtypes, poorly cohesive carcinoma not otherwise specified (PCC-NOS) and signet-ring cell carcinoma (SRCC), are characterized by less than 10% and more than 90% SRCs, respectively. However, research comparing the clinicopathological and transcriptomic differences between these subtypes remains limited. In this study, we conducted a comparative analysis of clinicopathological features in 55 advanced-stage PCCs, consisting of 43 PCC-NOS and 12 SRCC cases. Subsequently, 12 PCC-NOS and 5 SRCC cases were randomly selected for initial cancer-related gene expression profiling and pathway enrichment analysis using the GeoMx digital spatial profiler, followed by validation in a separate validation group comprising 16 PCC-NOS and 6 SRCC cases. These transcriptomic findings were then correlated with tumor morphology and clinicopathological data. PCC-NOS cases exhibited larger tumor size, a higher prevalence of pathological N3 disease, and a worse 1-year progression-free survival rate compared to SRCC cases. Clustering of PCC-NOS and SRCC was successfully achieved using the GeoMx Cancer Transcriptome Atlas. Among all studied genes, only <i>MMP7</i> showed differential expression, with its overexpression significantly associated with the PCC-NOS subtype, increased perineural invasion, and earlier disease progression. Pathway analysis revealed significantly enriched pathways in PCC-NOS related to vesicle-mediated transport, adaptive immune systems, oncogenic signaling, and extracellular matrix organization, while SRCC displayed significant enrichment in pathways associated with respiratory electron transport and the cell cycle. In conclusion, this study compares and correlates clinicopathological features and transcriptomic data between PCC-NOS and SRCC at advanced stages, employing the latest consensus classification and a novel platform for analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":48612,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pathology Clinical Research","volume":"10 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/2056-4538.12387","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pathology Clinical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2056-4538.12387","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Gastric poorly cohesive carcinoma (PCC) manifests with a diffuse pattern and diverse tumor cell morphologies, often indicating a more unfavorable prognosis. Recent consensus has reclassified PCC based on the proportion of signet-ring cells (SRCs) in tumors for research purposes. The two most distinct subtypes, poorly cohesive carcinoma not otherwise specified (PCC-NOS) and signet-ring cell carcinoma (SRCC), are characterized by less than 10% and more than 90% SRCs, respectively. However, research comparing the clinicopathological and transcriptomic differences between these subtypes remains limited. In this study, we conducted a comparative analysis of clinicopathological features in 55 advanced-stage PCCs, consisting of 43 PCC-NOS and 12 SRCC cases. Subsequently, 12 PCC-NOS and 5 SRCC cases were randomly selected for initial cancer-related gene expression profiling and pathway enrichment analysis using the GeoMx digital spatial profiler, followed by validation in a separate validation group comprising 16 PCC-NOS and 6 SRCC cases. These transcriptomic findings were then correlated with tumor morphology and clinicopathological data. PCC-NOS cases exhibited larger tumor size, a higher prevalence of pathological N3 disease, and a worse 1-year progression-free survival rate compared to SRCC cases. Clustering of PCC-NOS and SRCC was successfully achieved using the GeoMx Cancer Transcriptome Atlas. Among all studied genes, only MMP7 showed differential expression, with its overexpression significantly associated with the PCC-NOS subtype, increased perineural invasion, and earlier disease progression. Pathway analysis revealed significantly enriched pathways in PCC-NOS related to vesicle-mediated transport, adaptive immune systems, oncogenic signaling, and extracellular matrix organization, while SRCC displayed significant enrichment in pathways associated with respiratory electron transport and the cell cycle. In conclusion, this study compares and correlates clinicopathological features and transcriptomic data between PCC-NOS and SRCC at advanced stages, employing the latest consensus classification and a novel platform for analysis.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
粘连性差的胃癌亚型的临床病理特征和癌症转录组图谱。
胃癌(PCC)表现为弥漫性和多种肿瘤细胞形态,通常预示着较差的预后。为了便于研究,最近的共识是根据肿瘤中标志环细胞(SRC)的比例对 PCC 进行重新分类。两个最明显的亚型,即未另作规定的粘连性差的癌(PCC-NOS)和标志环细胞癌(SRCC),其特征分别是 SRC 的比例低于 10%和高于 90%。然而,比较这些亚型的临床病理学和转录组学差异的研究仍然有限。在本研究中,我们对 55 例晚期 PCC(包括 43 例 PCC-NOS 和 12 例 SRCC)的临床病理特征进行了比较分析。随后,我们随机选取了 12 例 PCC-NOS 和 5 例 SRCC 病例,使用 GeoMx 数字空间图谱分析仪进行了初步的癌症相关基因表达图谱分析和通路富集分析,并在由 16 例 PCC-NOS 和 6 例 SRCC 病例组成的单独验证组中进行了验证。然后将这些转录组研究结果与肿瘤形态学和临床病理学数据相关联。与 SRCC 病例相比,PCC-NOS 病例的肿瘤体积更大,病理 N3 病变发生率更高,1 年无进展生存率更低。利用GeoMx癌症转录组图谱成功实现了PCC-NOS和SRCC的聚类。在所有研究基因中,只有MMP7表现出差异表达,其过表达与PCC-NOS亚型、神经周围侵袭增加和疾病进展提前显著相关。通路分析显示,PCC-NOS 中与囊泡介导的转运、适应性免疫系统、致癌信号转导和细胞外基质组织相关的通路明显富集,而 SRCC 中与呼吸电子转运和细胞周期相关的通路明显富集。总之,本研究采用最新的共识分类和新型分析平台,比较并关联了处于晚期阶段的 PCC-NOS 和 SRCC 的临床病理特征和转录组数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pathology Clinical Research
Journal of Pathology Clinical Research Medicine-Pathology and Forensic Medicine
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
2.40%
发文量
47
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pathology: Clinical Research and The Journal of Pathology serve as translational bridges between basic biomedical science and clinical medicine with particular emphasis on, but not restricted to, tissue based studies. The focus of The Journal of Pathology: Clinical Research is the publication of studies that illuminate the clinical relevance of research in the broad area of the study of disease. Appropriately powered and validated studies with novel diagnostic, prognostic and predictive significance, and biomarker discover and validation, will be welcomed. Studies with a predominantly mechanistic basis will be more appropriate for the companion Journal of Pathology.
期刊最新文献
High chromosomal instability is associated with higher 10-year risks of recurrence for hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer patients: clinical evidence from a large-scale, multiple-site, retrospective study Large multimodal model-based standardisation of pathology reports with confidence and its prognostic significance Clinicopathological and epigenetic differences between primary neuroendocrine tumors and neuroendocrine metastases in the ovary Large language models as a diagnostic support tool in neuropathology Homologous recombination deficiency score is an independent prognostic factor in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1