Emulator-Based Bayesian Calibration of the CISNET Colorectal Cancer Models.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Medical Decision Making Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-10 DOI:10.1177/0272989X241255618
Carlos Pineda-Antunez, Claudia Seguin, Luuk A van Duuren, Amy B Knudsen, Barak Davidi, Pedro Nascimento de Lima, Carolyn Rutter, Karen M Kuntz, Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Nicholson Collier, Jonathan Ozik, Fernando Alarid-Escudero
{"title":"Emulator-Based Bayesian Calibration of the CISNET Colorectal Cancer Models.","authors":"Carlos Pineda-Antunez, Claudia Seguin, Luuk A van Duuren, Amy B Knudsen, Barak Davidi, Pedro Nascimento de Lima, Carolyn Rutter, Karen M Kuntz, Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar, Nicholson Collier, Jonathan Ozik, Fernando Alarid-Escudero","doi":"10.1177/0272989X241255618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To calibrate Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network (CISNET)'s SimCRC, MISCAN-Colon, and CRC-SPIN simulation models of the natural history colorectal cancer (CRC) with an emulator-based Bayesian algorithm and internally validate the model-predicted outcomes to calibration targets.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used Latin hypercube sampling to sample up to 50,000 parameter sets for each CISNET-CRC model and generated the corresponding outputs. We trained multilayer perceptron artificial neural networks (ANNs) as emulators using the input and output samples for each CISNET-CRC model. We selected ANN structures with corresponding hyperparameters (i.e., number of hidden layers, nodes, activation functions, epochs, and optimizer) that minimize the predicted mean square error on the validation sample. We implemented the ANN emulators in a probabilistic programming language and calibrated the input parameters with Hamiltonian Monte Carlo-based algorithms to obtain the joint posterior distributions of the CISNET-CRC models' parameters. We internally validated each calibrated emulator by comparing the model-predicted posterior outputs against the calibration targets.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The optimal ANN for SimCRC had 4 hidden layers and 360 hidden nodes, MISCAN-Colon had 4 hidden layers and 114 hidden nodes, and CRC-SPIN had 1 hidden layer and 140 hidden nodes. The total time for training and calibrating the emulators was 7.3, 4.0, and 0.66 h for SimCRC, MISCAN-Colon, and CRC-SPIN, respectively. The mean of the model-predicted outputs fell within the 95% confidence intervals of the calibration targets in 98 of 110 for SimCRC, 65 of 93 for MISCAN, and 31 of 41 targets for CRC-SPIN.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using ANN emulators is a practical solution to reduce the computational burden and complexity for Bayesian calibration of individual-level simulation models used for policy analysis, such as the CISNET CRC models. In this work, we present a step-by-step guide to constructing emulators for calibrating 3 realistic CRC individual-level models using a Bayesian approach.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>We use artificial neural networks (ANNs) to build emulators that surrogate complex individual-based models to reduce the computational burden in the Bayesian calibration process.ANNs showed good performance in emulating the CISNET-CRC microsimulation models, despite having many input parameters and outputs.Using ANN emulators is a practical solution to reduce the computational burden and complexity for Bayesian calibration of individual-level simulation models used for policy analysis.This work aims to support health decision scientists who want to quantify the uncertainty of calibrated parameters of computationally intensive simulation models under a Bayesian framework.</p>","PeriodicalId":49839,"journal":{"name":"Medical Decision Making","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11281870/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Decision Making","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X241255618","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To calibrate Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network (CISNET)'s SimCRC, MISCAN-Colon, and CRC-SPIN simulation models of the natural history colorectal cancer (CRC) with an emulator-based Bayesian algorithm and internally validate the model-predicted outcomes to calibration targets.

Methods: We used Latin hypercube sampling to sample up to 50,000 parameter sets for each CISNET-CRC model and generated the corresponding outputs. We trained multilayer perceptron artificial neural networks (ANNs) as emulators using the input and output samples for each CISNET-CRC model. We selected ANN structures with corresponding hyperparameters (i.e., number of hidden layers, nodes, activation functions, epochs, and optimizer) that minimize the predicted mean square error on the validation sample. We implemented the ANN emulators in a probabilistic programming language and calibrated the input parameters with Hamiltonian Monte Carlo-based algorithms to obtain the joint posterior distributions of the CISNET-CRC models' parameters. We internally validated each calibrated emulator by comparing the model-predicted posterior outputs against the calibration targets.

Results: The optimal ANN for SimCRC had 4 hidden layers and 360 hidden nodes, MISCAN-Colon had 4 hidden layers and 114 hidden nodes, and CRC-SPIN had 1 hidden layer and 140 hidden nodes. The total time for training and calibrating the emulators was 7.3, 4.0, and 0.66 h for SimCRC, MISCAN-Colon, and CRC-SPIN, respectively. The mean of the model-predicted outputs fell within the 95% confidence intervals of the calibration targets in 98 of 110 for SimCRC, 65 of 93 for MISCAN, and 31 of 41 targets for CRC-SPIN.

Conclusions: Using ANN emulators is a practical solution to reduce the computational burden and complexity for Bayesian calibration of individual-level simulation models used for policy analysis, such as the CISNET CRC models. In this work, we present a step-by-step guide to constructing emulators for calibrating 3 realistic CRC individual-level models using a Bayesian approach.

Highlights: We use artificial neural networks (ANNs) to build emulators that surrogate complex individual-based models to reduce the computational burden in the Bayesian calibration process.ANNs showed good performance in emulating the CISNET-CRC microsimulation models, despite having many input parameters and outputs.Using ANN emulators is a practical solution to reduce the computational burden and complexity for Bayesian calibration of individual-level simulation models used for policy analysis.This work aims to support health decision scientists who want to quantify the uncertainty of calibrated parameters of computationally intensive simulation models under a Bayesian framework.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于仿真器的 CISNET 大肠癌模型贝叶斯校准。
目的:使用基于仿真器的贝叶斯算法校准癌症干预和监测建模网络(CISNET)的SimCRC、MISCAN-Colon和CRC-SPIN结直肠癌(CRC)自然史模拟模型,并在内部验证模型预测结果是否符合校准目标:我们使用拉丁超立方采样法为每个 CISNET-CRC 模型采样多达 50,000 个参数集,并生成相应的输出结果。我们使用每个 CISNET-CRC 模型的输入和输出样本训练多层感知器人工神经网络(ANN)作为模拟器。我们选择了具有相应超参数(即隐层数、节点数、激活函数、历时和优化器)的人工神经网络结构,使验证样本的预测均方误差最小。我们用概率编程语言实现了 ANN 仿真器,并用基于哈密尔顿蒙特卡洛的算法校准了输入参数,以获得 CISNET-CRC 模型参数的联合后验分布。通过比较模型预测的后验输出与校准目标,我们对每个校准过的仿真器进行了内部验证:SimCRC 的最佳 ANN 有 4 个隐藏层和 360 个隐藏节点,MISCAN-Colon 有 4 个隐藏层和 114 个隐藏节点,CRC-SPIN 有 1 个隐藏层和 140 个隐藏节点。SimCRC、MISCAN-Colon 和 CRC-SPIN 模拟器的训练和校准总时间分别为 7.3、4.0 和 0.66 小时。SimCRC 110 个目标中有 98 个、MISCAN 93 个目标中有 65 个、CRC-SPIN 41 个目标中有 31 个的模型预测输出平均值在校准目标的 95% 置信区间内:对于用于政策分析的个体级模拟模型(如 CISNET CRC 模型),使用 ANN 仿真器是减轻计算负担和贝叶斯校准复杂性的实用解决方案。在这项工作中,我们逐步介绍了如何利用贝叶斯方法构建仿真器来校准 3 个现实的 CRC 个体级模型:我们使用人工神经网络(ANN)来构建仿真器,以替代复杂的基于个体的模型,从而减轻贝叶斯校准过程中的计算负担。尽管 CISNET-CRC 微观仿真模型有许多输入参数和输出,但人工神经网络在仿真模型中表现出良好的性能。这项工作旨在为希望在贝叶斯框架下量化计算密集型仿真模型校准参数不确定性的健康决策科学家提供支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Decision Making
Medical Decision Making 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
5.60%
发文量
146
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Decision Making offers rigorous and systematic approaches to decision making that are designed to improve the health and clinical care of individuals and to assist with health care policy development. Using the fundamentals of decision analysis and theory, economic evaluation, and evidence based quality assessment, Medical Decision Making presents both theoretical and practical statistical and modeling techniques and methods from a variety of disciplines.
期刊最新文献
Shared Decision Making Is in Need of Effectiveness-Implementation Hybrid Studies. Reframing SDM Using Implementation Science: SDM Is the Intervention. Incorporating Social Determinants of Health in Infectious Disease Models: A Systematic Review of Guidelines. Calculating the Expected Net Benefit of Sampling for Survival Data: A Tutorial and Case Study. The Use of Nudge Strategies in Improving Physicians' Prescribing Behavior: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1