Putting Health care Where the Kids Are: US Public Attitudes About School-Based Health Centers.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of School Health Pub Date : 2024-06-10 DOI:10.1111/josh.13478
Simon F Haeder, Daniel Marthey, Daniel Skinner
{"title":"Putting Health care Where the Kids Are: US Public Attitudes About School-Based Health Centers.","authors":"Simon F Haeder, Daniel Marthey, Daniel Skinner","doi":"10.1111/josh.13478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>School-based health centers (SBHCs) have been shown to offer substantial benefits to students but we know little about how the public thinks about them. We sought to assess US public attitudes about SBHCs and the provision of 7 health service lines-primary care, preventive care, vaccinations, preventive dental care, preventive vision care, mental health care, and nutrition counseling.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We administered a national online survey (N = 4196) of US adults using Lucid, a large, internet-based, opt-in panel to assess public attitudes about SBHCs as well as 7 commonly offered health services in SBHCs. We then used t-tests and weighted linear regression models to carry out our study objectives.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Unadjusted analysis revealed that more than 2 in 3 respondents supported SBHCs in general as well as the provision of all health services in SBHCs. Regression analysis indicated that ideology, partisanship, and trust in public school principals served as consistent predictors of attitudes when controlling for demographic and health characteristics. The provision of vaccinations stood out as particularly controversial. Subanalysis of parents found even higher levels of support as well as a more subdued role of ideology and partisanship.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The US public broadly supports the provision of health services in SBHCs. Our results should inform policymakers, advocates, and providers seeking to improve access to health care among school-aged children, particularly for underserved populations. Increasing knowledge about SBHCs and providing stable funding should be a priority. In the immediate future, SBHCs may offer an important buffer against ongoing Medicaid disenrollments.</p>","PeriodicalId":50059,"journal":{"name":"Journal of School Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of School Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.13478","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: School-based health centers (SBHCs) have been shown to offer substantial benefits to students but we know little about how the public thinks about them. We sought to assess US public attitudes about SBHCs and the provision of 7 health service lines-primary care, preventive care, vaccinations, preventive dental care, preventive vision care, mental health care, and nutrition counseling.

Methods: We administered a national online survey (N = 4196) of US adults using Lucid, a large, internet-based, opt-in panel to assess public attitudes about SBHCs as well as 7 commonly offered health services in SBHCs. We then used t-tests and weighted linear regression models to carry out our study objectives.

Results: Unadjusted analysis revealed that more than 2 in 3 respondents supported SBHCs in general as well as the provision of all health services in SBHCs. Regression analysis indicated that ideology, partisanship, and trust in public school principals served as consistent predictors of attitudes when controlling for demographic and health characteristics. The provision of vaccinations stood out as particularly controversial. Subanalysis of parents found even higher levels of support as well as a more subdued role of ideology and partisanship.

Conclusions: The US public broadly supports the provision of health services in SBHCs. Our results should inform policymakers, advocates, and providers seeking to improve access to health care among school-aged children, particularly for underserved populations. Increasing knowledge about SBHCs and providing stable funding should be a priority. In the immediate future, SBHCs may offer an important buffer against ongoing Medicaid disenrollments.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
把医疗保健放在孩子们身边:美国公众对校本医疗中心的态度。
背景:校本健康中心(SBHC)已被证明能为学生带来巨大的益处,但我们对公众如何看待这些中心却知之甚少。我们试图评估美国公众对校本健康中心以及其提供的 7 项健康服务(初级保健、预防保健、疫苗接种、预防性牙科保健、预防性视力保健、心理保健和营养咨询)的态度:我们使用 Lucid 对美国成年人进行了一次全国性在线调查(N = 4196),这是一个基于互联网的大型选择性调查小组,目的是评估公众对 SBHC 以及 SBHC 中通常提供的 7 项医疗服务的态度。然后,我们使用 t 检验和加权线性回归模型来实现我们的研究目标:未经调整的分析表明,超过三分之二的受访者总体上支持 SBHC 以及在 SBHC 中提供的所有医疗服务。回归分析表明,在控制人口和健康特征的情况下,意识形态、党派立场和对公立学校校长的信任是预测态度的一致因素。提供疫苗接种尤其具有争议性。对家长进行的子分析发现,家长的支持率更高,而意识形态和党派倾向的作用则更弱:结论:美国公众广泛支持在 SBHC 中提供医疗服务。我们的研究结果应为政策制定者、倡导者和医疗服务提供者提供信息,帮助他们改善学龄儿童获得医疗服务的机会,尤其是那些医疗服务不足的人群。增加对 SBHC 的了解并提供稳定的资金应成为当务之急。在不久的将来,SBHC 可能会为医疗补助计划的持续退出提供重要的缓冲。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of School Health
Journal of School Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
134
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of School Health is published 12 times a year on behalf of the American School Health Association. It addresses practice, theory, and research related to the health and well-being of school-aged youth. The journal is a top-tiered resource for professionals who work toward providing students with the programs, services, and environment they need for good health and academic success.
期刊最新文献
Primary School Pupils' Perceptions and Experiences of Wearable Technologies. Racial Disparities in a Teen Pregnancy Prevention Program: Abstinence-Only Versus a Comprehensive Sexuality Education Program. National Health Education Standards: Model Guidance for Curriculum and Instruction (Third Edition). Effect of Delaying High School Start Time on Teen Physical Activity, Screen Use, and Sports and Extracurricular Activity Participation: Results From START. Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1