A backward cycling programme for people with Parkinson's disease: a feasibility and preliminary results study.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine Pub Date : 2024-06-11 DOI:10.2340/jrm.v56.17738
Suzanne K O'Neal, Stephanie A Miller, Megan C Eikenberry, Elizabeth S Moore
{"title":"A backward cycling programme for people with Parkinson's disease: a feasibility and preliminary results study.","authors":"Suzanne K O'Neal, Stephanie A Miller, Megan C Eikenberry, Elizabeth S Moore","doi":"10.2340/jrm.v56.17738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the feasibility of backward cycling for people with Parkinson's disease. Secondary objectives were to assess changes in gait and balance following a 6-week program.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A single-group prospective pre-test, post-test study with 1-month follow-up.</p><p><strong>Subjects/patients: </strong>Twenty-six people with Parkinson's disease (mean age: 69 (7.74) years, gender: 83% males, time since diagnosis: 6 (4.44) years).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants pedaled backward on a stationary bicycle for 30 minutes at moderate intensity twice a week for 6 weeks. Feasibility was assessed by acceptability, suitability, and burden. Data collected at pre- and post-intervention with 1-month follow-up included backward stepping response variables, forward/backward gait variables, Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (MBT), and 6 Minute Walk Test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a high retention rate (95.8%) and adherence rate (100%) with one adverse event and minimal burden. Significant improvements were seen in step count and excursion distance during backward stepping responses, forward and backward gait velocity, forward step length, and the Mini-BESTest.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Backward cycling was a feasible intervention for people with Parkinson's disease, demonstrating low burden with high retention and adherence rates, and it is a safe exercise with the potential for benefits in gait and balance variables.</p>","PeriodicalId":54768,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11182036/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v56.17738","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess the feasibility of backward cycling for people with Parkinson's disease. Secondary objectives were to assess changes in gait and balance following a 6-week program.

Design: A single-group prospective pre-test, post-test study with 1-month follow-up.

Subjects/patients: Twenty-six people with Parkinson's disease (mean age: 69 (7.74) years, gender: 83% males, time since diagnosis: 6 (4.44) years).

Methods: Participants pedaled backward on a stationary bicycle for 30 minutes at moderate intensity twice a week for 6 weeks. Feasibility was assessed by acceptability, suitability, and burden. Data collected at pre- and post-intervention with 1-month follow-up included backward stepping response variables, forward/backward gait variables, Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (MBT), and 6 Minute Walk Test.

Results: There was a high retention rate (95.8%) and adherence rate (100%) with one adverse event and minimal burden. Significant improvements were seen in step count and excursion distance during backward stepping responses, forward and backward gait velocity, forward step length, and the Mini-BESTest.

Conclusion: Backward cycling was a feasible intervention for people with Parkinson's disease, demonstrating low burden with high retention and adherence rates, and it is a safe exercise with the potential for benefits in gait and balance variables.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
针对帕金森病患者的后向骑行计划:可行性和初步结果研究。
目的评估帕金森病患者骑自行车倒退的可行性。次要目标是评估为期 6 周的计划后步态和平衡的变化:设计:单组前瞻性前测、后测研究,随访 1 个月:26名帕金森病患者(平均年龄:69(7.74)岁,性别:83%为男性,确诊时间:6(4.44)年):参与者在固定自行车上以中等强度向后蹬 30 分钟,每周两次,持续 6 周。可行性通过可接受性、适宜性和负担进行评估。在干预前、干预后和 1 个月的随访中收集的数据包括后退踏步反应变量、前进/后退步态变量、迷你平衡评估系统测试(MBT)和 6 分钟步行测试:保留率(95.8%)和坚持率(100%)都很高,只有一起不良事件,负担很小。在后向踏步反应、前后步速、前向步长和迷你步行测试中,步数和偏移距离均有显著改善:结论:对于帕金森病患者来说,后退式自行车运动是一项可行的干预措施,其负担小、保持率和坚持率高,而且是一项安全的运动,有可能对步态和平衡变量产生益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
5.70%
发文量
102
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine is an international peer-review journal published in English, with at least 10 issues published per year. Original articles, reviews, case reports, short communications, special reports and letters to the editor are published, as also are editorials and book reviews. The journal strives to provide its readers with a variety of topics, including: functional assessment and intervention studies, clinical studies in various patient groups, methodology in physical and rehabilitation medicine, epidemiological studies on disabling conditions and reports on vocational and sociomedical aspects of rehabilitation.
期刊最新文献
Efficacy observation of combined transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation on gait in 169 subacute stroke patients. Ambulation recovery prediction after hip fracture surgery using the Hip Fracture Short-Term Ambulation Prediction tool. Screening cutoff values to identify the risk of falls after stroke: A scoping review. Risk-taking behaviour and executive functions, a major component of the risk of fall factors after recent stroke. The effects of rehabilitation potential on activities of daily living in patients with stroke in Taiwan: a prospective longitudinal study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1