Influence of Bone Cement Augmentation on Complications in Cephalomedullary Nail Fixation of Geriatric Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures.

Kansas journal of medicine Pub Date : 2024-06-04 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.17161/kjm.vol17.21608
Jake M Bianco, Nathan W Whitsell, Thomas J McCormack, Randall L Lais, Bradley R Dart, Brandon R Scott, Rosalee E Zackula, Chad M Corrigan
{"title":"Influence of Bone Cement Augmentation on Complications in Cephalomedullary Nail Fixation of Geriatric Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures.","authors":"Jake M Bianco, Nathan W Whitsell, Thomas J McCormack, Randall L Lais, Bradley R Dart, Brandon R Scott, Rosalee E Zackula, Chad M Corrigan","doi":"10.17161/kjm.vol17.21608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The purpose of this study was to determine if augmentation of the helical blade with polymethylmethacrylate bone cement decreases the rates of varus cut-out and medial perforation in geriatric intertrochanteric hip fracture fixation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective comparative cohort study at two urban Level I trauma centers. Patients with an intertrochanteric hip fracture (classified as AO 31A1-3) who were treated with the TFN-Advanced Proximal Femoral Nailing System (TFNA) from 2018 to 2021 were eligible for the study. Medical records and post-operative radiographs were reviewed to determine procedure complications and reoperations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 179 patients studied, cement augmentation (CA) was used in 93 patients (52%) and no cement augmentation (NCA) was used in 86 (48%). There were no significant differences between group demographics and fracture reduction grades. Varus cut-out occurred three times in the CA group and five times in the NCA group (p = 0.48). Medial perforation occurred three times, all in the NCA group (p = 0.11). The most frequent complication was symptomatic blade lateralization from fracture collapse, with eight occurrences in the CA group compared with two in the NCA group (p = 0.10). There were 10 reoperations in the CA group and 9 in the NCA group (p = 0.99). The most common reason for reoperation was varus cut-out and the most common revision procedure was hip arthroplasty.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Intertrochanteric hip fractures treated with the TFNA fixation system with and without cement augmentation have similar complication profiles and reoperation rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":94121,"journal":{"name":"Kansas journal of medicine","volume":"17 ","pages":"57-60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11164424/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kansas journal of medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17161/kjm.vol17.21608","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to determine if augmentation of the helical blade with polymethylmethacrylate bone cement decreases the rates of varus cut-out and medial perforation in geriatric intertrochanteric hip fracture fixation.

Methods: This was a retrospective comparative cohort study at two urban Level I trauma centers. Patients with an intertrochanteric hip fracture (classified as AO 31A1-3) who were treated with the TFN-Advanced Proximal Femoral Nailing System (TFNA) from 2018 to 2021 were eligible for the study. Medical records and post-operative radiographs were reviewed to determine procedure complications and reoperations.

Results: Of the 179 patients studied, cement augmentation (CA) was used in 93 patients (52%) and no cement augmentation (NCA) was used in 86 (48%). There were no significant differences between group demographics and fracture reduction grades. Varus cut-out occurred three times in the CA group and five times in the NCA group (p = 0.48). Medial perforation occurred three times, all in the NCA group (p = 0.11). The most frequent complication was symptomatic blade lateralization from fracture collapse, with eight occurrences in the CA group compared with two in the NCA group (p = 0.10). There were 10 reoperations in the CA group and 9 in the NCA group (p = 0.99). The most common reason for reoperation was varus cut-out and the most common revision procedure was hip arthroplasty.

Conclusions: Intertrochanteric hip fractures treated with the TFNA fixation system with and without cement augmentation have similar complication profiles and reoperation rates.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
骨水泥增强对老年髋臼转子间骨折头髓内钉固定并发症的影响
简介:本研究的目的是确定用聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯骨水泥增强螺旋刀片是否能降低老年转子间髋部骨折固定中的曲张切口率和内侧穿孔率:这是一项在两个城市一级创伤中心进行的回顾性队列比较研究。2018年至2021年期间使用TFN-Advanced股骨近端钉系统(TFNA)治疗的转子间髋部骨折(分类为AO 31A1-3)患者符合研究条件。研究人员审查了病历和术后X光片,以确定手术并发症和再手术情况:在研究的179名患者中,93名患者(52%)使用了骨水泥增强(CA),86名患者(48%)未使用骨水泥增强(NCA)。各组人口统计学和骨折复位等级之间没有明显差异。CA组发生3次外翻,NCA组发生5次外翻(P = 0.48)。内侧穿孔发生了三次,均发生在 NCA 组(P = 0.11)。最常见的并发症是骨折塌陷导致的无症状刀片侧移,CA 组发生 8 次,NCA 组发生 2 次(P = 0.10)。CA 组有 10 例再次手术,NCA 组有 9 例(P = 0.99)。最常见的再手术原因是屈曲切开,最常见的翻修手术是髋关节置换术:结论:使用TFNA固定系统治疗转子间髋部骨折,无论是否使用骨水泥增强,其并发症情况和再手术率相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Case Report of a Mediastinal Granuloma Related to Histoplasmosis with Streptococcus dysgalactiae Subspecies equisimilis Superinfection Resulting in Abscess and Subsequent Pericarditis in a Pediatric Patient. A Diagnosis of Trichoblastic Carcinoma Using Immunohistochemistry. Acute Border Zone Infarcts in Hypereosinophilic Syndrome. Clinical Efficacy of Ultrasound-guided Iliopsoas Corticosteriod Injection for Hip Pain. Descriptive Evaluation in Outpatient Follow-Up of Direct LDL-C in Patients with Elevated Triglycerides and Diabetes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1