Use of Tocolytic Agents in Preterm Labor: A Cross-Sectional Analysis from a Chinese Real-World Study from 2016 to 2021

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics Pub Date : 2024-06-10 DOI:10.1155/2024/3206060
Haoran Liu, Xianli Wang
{"title":"Use of Tocolytic Agents in Preterm Labor: A Cross-Sectional Analysis from a Chinese Real-World Study from 2016 to 2021","authors":"Haoran Liu,&nbsp;Xianli Wang","doi":"10.1155/2024/3206060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><i>What Is Known and Objective</i>. Tocolytic agents are used to prolong gestational age and prevent immediate preterm birth (PTB). This study aims to provide an overview of the use of tocolytics among patients with PTB in China through retrospectively analyzing trends in application, influencing factors, and inappropriate prescriptions. <i>Methods</i>. The prescription data of five tocolytic agents from 2016 to 2021 were extracted from the database of the Hospital Prescription Analysis Cooperation Project. Drug consumption was expressed as number of prescriptions, cost of prescriptions, and DDDs (defined daily doses). Pearson correlation analysis was used to examine the association between DDDs and DDC (defined daily cost). The appropriateness of prescriptions was analyzed in terms of drug dosage form, administration, clinical diagnosis, and combined medication. <i>Results</i>. The total number of tocolytic prescriptions and the total cost of tocolytic agents increased by 6.12% and 387.58%, respectively, over the six-year duration of the study. From 2016 to 2021, the ranking of the number of prescriptions and DDDs of tocolytic agents was magnesium sulfate &gt; ritodrine &gt; nifedipine &gt; indomethacin &gt; atosiban. During the study period, the cost of tocolytic agents increased significantly, which was mainly related to the increased costs of magnesium sulfate in 2017 and atosiban in 2018 and 2019. The ranking of DDCs was atosiban &gt; ritodrine &gt; magnesium sulfate &gt; nifedipine = indomethacin from 2016 to 2021. For atosiban, the DDC was negatively correlated with the DDDs. Inappropriate prescription, which accounted for 14.84% of all prescriptions, was mainly manifested in the inappropriate selection of nifedipine dosage form, low frequency of nifedipine and indomethacin, and overdosing of ritodrine. Furthermore, 22.87% of tocolytic prescriptions remained active after 34 weeks of gestation, and 7.24% of the prescriptions authorized the use of combination drugs, with magnesium sulfate and nifedipine being the most commonly prescribed combination. <i>What Is New and Conclusion</i>. Magnesium sulfate, ritodrine, and nifedipine were the top three tocolytic agents. As the inappropriate use of tocolytic agents continues to persist, it is important to intensify efforts to ensure the safety and the appropriateness of maternal medication.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15381,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics","volume":"2024 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/3206060","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/3206060","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

What Is Known and Objective. Tocolytic agents are used to prolong gestational age and prevent immediate preterm birth (PTB). This study aims to provide an overview of the use of tocolytics among patients with PTB in China through retrospectively analyzing trends in application, influencing factors, and inappropriate prescriptions. Methods. The prescription data of five tocolytic agents from 2016 to 2021 were extracted from the database of the Hospital Prescription Analysis Cooperation Project. Drug consumption was expressed as number of prescriptions, cost of prescriptions, and DDDs (defined daily doses). Pearson correlation analysis was used to examine the association between DDDs and DDC (defined daily cost). The appropriateness of prescriptions was analyzed in terms of drug dosage form, administration, clinical diagnosis, and combined medication. Results. The total number of tocolytic prescriptions and the total cost of tocolytic agents increased by 6.12% and 387.58%, respectively, over the six-year duration of the study. From 2016 to 2021, the ranking of the number of prescriptions and DDDs of tocolytic agents was magnesium sulfate > ritodrine > nifedipine > indomethacin > atosiban. During the study period, the cost of tocolytic agents increased significantly, which was mainly related to the increased costs of magnesium sulfate in 2017 and atosiban in 2018 and 2019. The ranking of DDCs was atosiban > ritodrine > magnesium sulfate > nifedipine = indomethacin from 2016 to 2021. For atosiban, the DDC was negatively correlated with the DDDs. Inappropriate prescription, which accounted for 14.84% of all prescriptions, was mainly manifested in the inappropriate selection of nifedipine dosage form, low frequency of nifedipine and indomethacin, and overdosing of ritodrine. Furthermore, 22.87% of tocolytic prescriptions remained active after 34 weeks of gestation, and 7.24% of the prescriptions authorized the use of combination drugs, with magnesium sulfate and nifedipine being the most commonly prescribed combination. What Is New and Conclusion. Magnesium sulfate, ritodrine, and nifedipine were the top three tocolytic agents. As the inappropriate use of tocolytic agents continues to persist, it is important to intensify efforts to ensure the safety and the appropriateness of maternal medication.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在早产中使用促凝血剂:2016-2021年中国真实世界研究的横断面分析
已知信息和目标。促溶血药物用于延长胎龄和预防即刻性早产(PTB)。本研究旨在通过回顾性分析应用趋势、影响因素和不当处方,概述中国早产儿患者使用溶血剂的情况。方法从 "医院处方分析合作项目 "数据库中提取2016年至2021年五种解痉剂的处方数据。药物消耗量以处方数量、处方费用和DDD(定义日剂量)表示。皮尔逊相关分析用于研究DDDs与DDC(规定日剂量)之间的关联。从药物剂型、给药方式、临床诊断和合并用药等方面分析了处方的适当性。结果在研究的六年时间里,解痉剂处方总数和总费用分别增加了 6.12% 和 387.58%。从2016年到2021年,解痉剂处方数和DDD排名依次为硫酸镁> 利托君> 硝苯地平> 吲哚美辛> 阿托西班。在研究期间,溶血剂的成本明显增加,这主要与 2017 年硫酸镁和 2018 年、2019 年阿托西班的成本增加有关。2016年至2021年,DDCs的排名为阿托西班>利托君>硫酸镁>硝苯地平=吲哚美辛。就阿托西班而言,DDC 与 DDD 呈负相关。不恰当处方占所有处方的14.84%,主要表现为硝苯地平剂型选择不当、硝苯地平和吲哚美辛使用频率低、利多君用药过量等。此外,22.87%的促溶血处方在妊娠 34 周后仍在使用,7.24%的处方授权使用联合用药,其中硫酸镁和硝苯地平是最常见的联合用药。新内容和结论。硫酸镁、利托君和硝苯地平是前三种解痉剂。由于不适当使用促溶血药物的现象依然存在,因此必须加大力度确保孕产妇用药的安全性和适当性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics provides a forum for clinicians, pharmacists and pharmacologists to explore and report on issues of common interest. Reports and commentaries on current issues in medical and pharmaceutical practice are encouraged. Papers on evidence-based clinical practice and multidisciplinary collaborative work are particularly welcome. Regular sections in the journal include: editorials, commentaries, reviews (including systematic overviews and meta-analyses), original research and reports, and book reviews. Its scope embraces all aspects of clinical drug development and therapeutics, including: Rational therapeutics Evidence-based practice Safety, cost-effectiveness and clinical efficacy of drugs Drug interactions Clinical impact of drug formulations Pharmacogenetics Personalised, stratified and translational medicine Clinical pharmacokinetics.
期刊最新文献
Medication Errors: An Update From the Central Region of Ghana Synergistic Inhibitory Effect of Gliquidone Against Cisplatin-Resistant Human Lung Adenocarcinoma TH-302: A Highly Selective Hypoxia-Activated Prodrug for Treating PARP Inhibitor–Resistant Cancers Potential Role of APC Mutations in the Prognosis and Targeted Therapy of Gastric Adenocarcinoma The Evaluation for Expandable Applications of Tislelizumab in First-Line Treatment for Advanced Gastric Cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1