Development and validation of a method for analysis of 25 cannabinoids in oral fluid and exhaled breath condensate.

IF 3.8 2区 化学 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-12 DOI:10.1007/s00216-024-05369-8
Meena Swaminathan, Anamary Tarifa, Anthony P DeCaprio
{"title":"Development and validation of a method for analysis of 25 cannabinoids in oral fluid and exhaled breath condensate.","authors":"Meena Swaminathan, Anamary Tarifa, Anthony P DeCaprio","doi":"10.1007/s00216-024-05369-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Currently, there is a significant demand in forensic toxicology for biomarkers of cannabis exposure that, unlike ∆<sup>9</sup>-tetrahydrocannabinol, can reliably indicate time and frequency of use, be sampled with relative ease, and correlate with impairment. Oral fluid (OF) and exhaled breath condensate (EBC) are alternative, non-invasive sample matrices that hold promise for identifying cannabis exposure biomarkers. OF, produced by salivary glands, is increasingly utilized in drug screening due to its non-invasive collection and is being explored as an alternative matrix for cannabinoid analysis. EBC is an aqueous specimen consisting of condensed water vapor containing water-soluble volatile and non-volatile components present in exhaled breath. Despite potential advantages, there are no reports on the use of EBC for cannabinoid detection. This study developed a supported liquid extraction approach and LC-QqQ-MS dMRM analytical method for quantification of 25 major and minor cannabinoids and metabolites in OF and EBC. The method was validated according to the ANSI/ASB 036 standard and other published guidelines. LOQ ranged from 0.5 to 6.0 ng/mL for all cannabinoids in both matrices. Recoveries for most analytes were 60-90%, with generally higher values for EBC compared to OF. Matrix effects were observed with some cannabinoids, with effects mitigated by use of matrix-matched calibration. Bias and precision were within ± 25%. Method applicability was demonstrated by analyzing ten authentic OF and EBC samples, with positive detections of multiple analytes in both matrices. The method will facilitate comprehensive analysis of cannabinoids in non-invasive sample matrices for the development of reliable cannabis exposure biomarkers.</p>","PeriodicalId":462,"journal":{"name":"Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-024-05369-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Currently, there is a significant demand in forensic toxicology for biomarkers of cannabis exposure that, unlike ∆9-tetrahydrocannabinol, can reliably indicate time and frequency of use, be sampled with relative ease, and correlate with impairment. Oral fluid (OF) and exhaled breath condensate (EBC) are alternative, non-invasive sample matrices that hold promise for identifying cannabis exposure biomarkers. OF, produced by salivary glands, is increasingly utilized in drug screening due to its non-invasive collection and is being explored as an alternative matrix for cannabinoid analysis. EBC is an aqueous specimen consisting of condensed water vapor containing water-soluble volatile and non-volatile components present in exhaled breath. Despite potential advantages, there are no reports on the use of EBC for cannabinoid detection. This study developed a supported liquid extraction approach and LC-QqQ-MS dMRM analytical method for quantification of 25 major and minor cannabinoids and metabolites in OF and EBC. The method was validated according to the ANSI/ASB 036 standard and other published guidelines. LOQ ranged from 0.5 to 6.0 ng/mL for all cannabinoids in both matrices. Recoveries for most analytes were 60-90%, with generally higher values for EBC compared to OF. Matrix effects were observed with some cannabinoids, with effects mitigated by use of matrix-matched calibration. Bias and precision were within ± 25%. Method applicability was demonstrated by analyzing ten authentic OF and EBC samples, with positive detections of multiple analytes in both matrices. The method will facilitate comprehensive analysis of cannabinoids in non-invasive sample matrices for the development of reliable cannabis exposure biomarkers.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开发并验证分析口服液和呼出气体冷凝物中 25 种大麻素的方法。
目前,法医毒理学对大麻暴露生物标志物的需求很大,这些生物标志物与 ∆9- 四氢大麻酚不同,可以可靠地表明使用大麻的时间和频率,相对容易采样,并且与损伤相关。口腔液(OF)和呼出气体冷凝物(EBC)是另一种非侵入性样本基质,有望用于鉴定大麻暴露生物标记物。口腔液由唾液腺分泌,由于其采集无创,越来越多地用于药物筛选,目前正被探索用作大麻素分析的替代基质。EBC 是一种水样标本,由水蒸气凝结而成,含有呼出气体中的水溶性挥发性和非挥发性成分。尽管 EBC 具有潜在的优势,但目前尚无使用 EBC 进行大麻素检测的报告。本研究开发了一种辅助液体萃取方法和 LC-QqQ-MS dMRM 分析方法,用于定量检测 OF 和 EBC 中的 25 种主要和次要大麻素及代谢物。该方法根据 ANSI/ASB 036 标准和其他已公布的指南进行了验证。两种基质中所有大麻素的最低检测限均为 0.5 至 6.0 纳克/毫升。大多数分析物的回收率为 60-90%,EBC 的回收率普遍高于 OF。在某些大麻素中观察到基质效应,使用基质匹配校准可减轻这种效应。偏差和精确度在 ± 25% 以内。通过分析十份真实的 OF 和 EBC 样品,证明了该方法的适用性,在两种基质中均检测到多种分析物呈阳性。该方法将有助于全面分析非侵入性样品基质中的大麻素,以开发可靠的大麻暴露生物标记物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
4.70%
发文量
638
审稿时长
2.1 months
期刊介绍: Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry’s mission is the rapid publication of excellent and high-impact research articles on fundamental and applied topics of analytical and bioanalytical measurement science. Its scope is broad, and ranges from novel measurement platforms and their characterization to multidisciplinary approaches that effectively address important scientific problems. The Editors encourage submissions presenting innovative analytical research in concept, instrumentation, methods, and/or applications, including: mass spectrometry, spectroscopy, and electroanalysis; advanced separations; analytical strategies in “-omics” and imaging, bioanalysis, and sampling; miniaturized devices, medical diagnostics, sensors; analytical characterization of nano- and biomaterials; chemometrics and advanced data analysis.
期刊最新文献
Extraction of redox extracellular vesicles using exclusion-based sample preparation. Monomer-mediated growth of β-cyclodextrin-based microporous organic network as stationary phase for capillary electrochromatography. The evolution of data treatment tools in single-particle and single-cell ICP-MS analytics. Development of a high-throughput UHPLC-MS/MS method for the analysis of Fusarium and Alternaria toxins in cereals and cereal-based food. Rigorous scientific inquiry guided by creativity, curiosity and support: One of the last Renaissance scientists of our time.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1