Evaluating compliance with the care standard of proactively assessing bone health in patients with diabetes: a pilot audit of practice across Asia by the Asia Pacific Consortium on Osteoporosis (APCO).

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Archives of Osteoporosis Pub Date : 2024-06-11 DOI:10.1007/s11657-024-01399-y
M Chandran, N Aftab, A Amin, T Amphansap, S K Bhadada, M Chadha, D C Chan, F L Hew, S Kaur, A H Khan, A K Kwee, L T Ho-Pham, S Lekamwasam, D C Minh, A Prasanth, R Sharma, T Valleenukul, N Zehra, A Mithal
{"title":"Evaluating compliance with the care standard of proactively assessing bone health in patients with diabetes: a pilot audit of practice across Asia by the Asia Pacific Consortium on Osteoporosis (APCO).","authors":"M Chandran, N Aftab, A Amin, T Amphansap, S K Bhadada, M Chadha, D C Chan, F L Hew, S Kaur, A H Khan, A K Kwee, L T Ho-Pham, S Lekamwasam, D C Minh, A Prasanth, R Sharma, T Valleenukul, N Zehra, A Mithal","doi":"10.1007/s11657-024-01399-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This pilot audit explored how bone health is assessed patients with diabetes in diverse centres across Asia. Only 343 of 1092 (31%) audited patients had a bone health assessment, 27% of whom were diagnosed with osteoporosis. Quality improvement strategies are needed to address gaps in patient care in this area.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The Asia Pacific Consortium on Osteoporosis (APCO) Framework outlines clinical standards for assessing and managing osteoporosis. A pilot audit evaluated adherence to clinical standard 4, which states that bone health should be assessed in patients with conditions associated with bone loss and/or increased fracture risk; this report summarises the audit findings in patients with diabetes. A secondary aim was to assess the practicality and real-world use of the APCO bone health audit tool kit.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eight centres across Asia participated in the pilot audit, selecting diabetes as the target group. Participants reviewed their practice records for at least 20 consecutively treated patients with the target condition. Questions covered routine investigations, bone health assessment, osteoporosis diagnosis, and patient referral pathways. Data were summarised descriptively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The participants represented public hospitals, university medical centres, and private clinics from India, Malaysia, Pakistan, Singapore, Taiwan, and Vietnam that see an estimated total of 95,000 patients with diabetes per year. Overall, only 343 of 1092 audited patients (31%) had a bone health assessment. Osteoporosis was subsequently diagnosed in 92 of 343 (27%) patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Bone health was not assessed in most patients with diabetes. The results provide insight into current practices across diverse Asian centres and demonstrate the practical value of the audit tool kit. Participant feedback has been used to improve the tool kit. Results of this pilot audit are being used in the respective centres to inform quality improvement projects needed to overcome the gap in patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":8283,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Osteoporosis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11166814/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Osteoporosis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-024-01399-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This pilot audit explored how bone health is assessed patients with diabetes in diverse centres across Asia. Only 343 of 1092 (31%) audited patients had a bone health assessment, 27% of whom were diagnosed with osteoporosis. Quality improvement strategies are needed to address gaps in patient care in this area.

Purpose: The Asia Pacific Consortium on Osteoporosis (APCO) Framework outlines clinical standards for assessing and managing osteoporosis. A pilot audit evaluated adherence to clinical standard 4, which states that bone health should be assessed in patients with conditions associated with bone loss and/or increased fracture risk; this report summarises the audit findings in patients with diabetes. A secondary aim was to assess the practicality and real-world use of the APCO bone health audit tool kit.

Methods: Eight centres across Asia participated in the pilot audit, selecting diabetes as the target group. Participants reviewed their practice records for at least 20 consecutively treated patients with the target condition. Questions covered routine investigations, bone health assessment, osteoporosis diagnosis, and patient referral pathways. Data were summarised descriptively.

Results: The participants represented public hospitals, university medical centres, and private clinics from India, Malaysia, Pakistan, Singapore, Taiwan, and Vietnam that see an estimated total of 95,000 patients with diabetes per year. Overall, only 343 of 1092 audited patients (31%) had a bone health assessment. Osteoporosis was subsequently diagnosed in 92 of 343 (27%) patients.

Conclusion: Bone health was not assessed in most patients with diabetes. The results provide insight into current practices across diverse Asian centres and demonstrate the practical value of the audit tool kit. Participant feedback has been used to improve the tool kit. Results of this pilot audit are being used in the respective centres to inform quality improvement projects needed to overcome the gap in patient care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估糖尿病患者主动评估骨骼健康的护理标准遵守情况:亚太骨质疏松症联盟 (APCO) 在亚洲各地开展的试点审计。
这项试点审计探索了亚洲不同中心如何对糖尿病患者进行骨骼健康评估。在接受审核的 1092 名患者中,只有 343 人(31%)接受了骨健康评估,其中 27% 的患者被诊断为骨质疏松症。目的:亚太骨质疏松症联盟(APCO)框架概述了评估和管理骨质疏松症的临床标准。试点审计评估了临床标准 4 的遵守情况,该标准规定,对于患有骨质流失和/或骨折风险增加相关疾病的患者,应评估其骨骼健康状况;本报告总结了糖尿病患者的审计结果。次要目的是评估APCO骨健康审核工具包的实用性和实际使用情况:方法:亚洲的八个中心参与了试点审核,并选择糖尿病患者作为目标群体。参与者审查了至少 20 名连续接受治疗的目标患者的诊疗记录。问题涉及常规检查、骨健康评估、骨质疏松症诊断和患者转诊途径。对数据进行了描述性总结:结果:参与者来自印度、马来西亚、巴基斯坦、新加坡、台湾和越南的公立医院、大学医疗中心和私人诊所,估计每年共诊治 95,000 名糖尿病患者。总体而言,在 1092 名接受审计的患者中,只有 343 人(31%)进行过骨骼健康评估。343名患者中有92名(27%)随后被诊断为骨质疏松症:结论:大多数糖尿病患者的骨骼健康都没有得到评估。研究结果让我们了解了不同亚洲中心的现行做法,并证明了审核工具包的实用价值。参与者的反馈意见已被用于改进工具包。各中心正在利用此次试点审核的结果为所需的质量改进项目提供信息,以克服患者护理方面的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of Osteoporosis
Archives of Osteoporosis ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISMORTHOPEDICS -ORTHOPEDICS
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
133
期刊介绍: Archives of Osteoporosis is an international multidisciplinary journal which is a joint initiative of the International Osteoporosis Foundation and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA. The journal will highlight the specificities of different regions around the world concerning epidemiology, reference values for bone density and bone metabolism, as well as clinical aspects of osteoporosis and other bone diseases.
期刊最新文献
Association between bone microarchitecture and sarcopenia in postmenopausal women with type 2 diabetes. Individuals with a fragility fracture and a prescription for bone active medication have a positive perception of the medication but do not associate it with fracture risk reduction. Prevalence of fractures in adults over 50 years of age with osteoporosis in Colombia. Correction to: Incidence and excess mortality of hip fractures in a predominantly Caucasian population in the South of Brazil. Perspectives of healthcare providers on osteoporosis, falls and fracture risk: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1