The visual cortex in the blind but not the auditory cortex in the deaf becomes multiple-demand regions.

IF 10.6 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Brain Pub Date : 2024-10-03 DOI:10.1093/brain/awae187
Hasan Duymuş, Mohini Verma, Yasemin Güçlütürk, Mesut Öztürk, Ayşe B Varol, Şehmus Kurt, Tamer Gezici, Berhan F Akgür, İrem Giray, Elif E Öksüz, Ausaf A Farooqui
{"title":"The visual cortex in the blind but not the auditory cortex in the deaf becomes multiple-demand regions.","authors":"Hasan Duymuş, Mohini Verma, Yasemin Güçlütürk, Mesut Öztürk, Ayşe B Varol, Şehmus Kurt, Tamer Gezici, Berhan F Akgür, İrem Giray, Elif E Öksüz, Ausaf A Farooqui","doi":"10.1093/brain/awae187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The fate of deprived sensory cortices (visual regions in the blind and auditory regions in the deaf) exemplifies the extent to which experience can change brain regions. These regions are frequently seen to activate during tasks involving other sensory modalities, leading many authors to infer that these regions have started to process sensory information of other modalities. However, such observations can also imply that these regions are now activating in response to any task event, regardless of the sensory modality. Activating in response to task events, irrespective of the sensory modality involved, is a feature of the multiple-demands (MD) network. This is a set of regions within the frontal and parietal cortices that activate in response to any kind of control demand. Thus, demands as diverse as attention, perceptual difficulty, rule-switching, updating working memory, inhibiting responses, decision-making and difficult arithmetic all activate the same set of regions that are thought to instantiate domain-general cognitive control and underpin fluid intelligence. We investigated whether deprived sensory cortices, or foci within them, become part of the MD network. We tested whether the same foci within the visual regions of the blind and auditory regions of the deaf activated in response to different control demands. We found that control demands related to updating auditory working memory, difficult tactile decisions, time-duration judgments and sensorimotor speed all activated the entire bilateral occipital regions in the blind but not in the sighted. These occipital regions in the blind were the only regions outside the canonical frontoparietal MD regions to show such activation in response to multiple control demands. Furthermore, compared with the sighted, these occipital regions in the blind had higher functional connectivity with frontoparietal MD regions. Early deaf, in contrast, did not activate their auditory regions in response to different control demands, showing that auditory regions do not become MD regions in the deaf. We suggest that visual regions in the blind do not take a new sensory role but become part of the MD network, and this is not a response of all deprived sensory cortices but a feature unique to the visual regions.</p>","PeriodicalId":9063,"journal":{"name":"Brain","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11449128/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awae187","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The fate of deprived sensory cortices (visual regions in the blind and auditory regions in the deaf) exemplifies the extent to which experience can change brain regions. These regions are frequently seen to activate during tasks involving other sensory modalities, leading many authors to infer that these regions have started to process sensory information of other modalities. However, such observations can also imply that these regions are now activating in response to any task event, regardless of the sensory modality. Activating in response to task events, irrespective of the sensory modality involved, is a feature of the multiple-demands (MD) network. This is a set of regions within the frontal and parietal cortices that activate in response to any kind of control demand. Thus, demands as diverse as attention, perceptual difficulty, rule-switching, updating working memory, inhibiting responses, decision-making and difficult arithmetic all activate the same set of regions that are thought to instantiate domain-general cognitive control and underpin fluid intelligence. We investigated whether deprived sensory cortices, or foci within them, become part of the MD network. We tested whether the same foci within the visual regions of the blind and auditory regions of the deaf activated in response to different control demands. We found that control demands related to updating auditory working memory, difficult tactile decisions, time-duration judgments and sensorimotor speed all activated the entire bilateral occipital regions in the blind but not in the sighted. These occipital regions in the blind were the only regions outside the canonical frontoparietal MD regions to show such activation in response to multiple control demands. Furthermore, compared with the sighted, these occipital regions in the blind had higher functional connectivity with frontoparietal MD regions. Early deaf, in contrast, did not activate their auditory regions in response to different control demands, showing that auditory regions do not become MD regions in the deaf. We suggest that visual regions in the blind do not take a new sensory role but become part of the MD network, and this is not a response of all deprived sensory cortices but a feature unique to the visual regions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
盲人的视觉皮层会成为多重需求区域,而聋人的听觉皮层则不会。
被剥夺感觉的大脑皮层--盲人的视觉区域和聋人的听觉区域--的命运说明了经验可以在多大程度上改变大脑区域。这些区域经常在涉及其他感官模式的任务中被激活,因此许多人推断这些区域已经开始处理其他模式的感官信息。然而,这种观察也可能意味着,这些区域现在对任何任务事件都会激活,而不论其感官模式如何。对任务事件(无论涉及何种感觉模式)的激活是多重要求(MD)网络的一个特征。这些区域是额叶和顶叶皮层中的一组共同区域,会在任何控制要求下激活。因此,注意力、知觉困难、规则切换、更新工作记忆、抑制反应、决策和困难算术等各种需求都会激活这组相同的区域,而这些区域被认为是领域一般认知控制的实例化和流体智能的基础。我们研究了被剥夺的感觉皮层或其中的病灶是否会成为 MD 网络的一部分。我们测试了盲人视觉区域和聋人听觉区域中的相同病灶是否会因不同的控制需求而激活。我们发现,与更新听觉工作记忆、困难的触觉决策、时间长度判断和感觉运动速度有关的控制要求都会激活盲人的整个双侧枕叶区域,而明眼人则不会。盲人的这些枕叶区是在典型的额顶叶 MD 区之外,唯一对多重控制要求表现出这种激活的区域。此外,与明眼人相比,盲人的这些枕叶区域与前额顶MD区域具有更高的功能连接性。与此相反,早期聋人的听觉区域并没有因为不同的控制要求而被激活,这表明听觉区域并没有成为聋人的MD区域。我们认为,盲人的视觉区域并没有扮演新的感觉角色,而是成为了MD网络的一部分,这并不是所有被剥夺感觉的大脑皮层的反应,而是视觉区域独有的特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Brain
Brain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
20.30
自引率
4.10%
发文量
458
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Brain, a journal focused on clinical neurology and translational neuroscience, has been publishing landmark papers since 1878. The journal aims to expand its scope by including studies that shed light on disease mechanisms and conducting innovative clinical trials for brain disorders. With a wide range of topics covered, the Editorial Board represents the international readership and diverse coverage of the journal. Accepted articles are promptly posted online, typically within a few weeks of acceptance. As of 2022, Brain holds an impressive impact factor of 14.5, according to the Journal Citation Reports.
期刊最新文献
Transient brain structure changes after high phenylalanine exposure in adults with phenylketonuria. Low-intensity ultrasound ameliorates brain organoid integration and rescues microcephaly deficits. A mutation in the PRKAR1B gene drives pathological mechanisms of neurodegeneration across species. Single-value brain activity scores reflect both severity and risk across the Alzheimer's continuum. Subthalamic control of impulsive actions: insights from deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1