Franseen needle in endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration: a phase II prospective study.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Japanese journal of clinical oncology Pub Date : 2024-09-04 DOI:10.1093/jjco/hyae077
Kohei Shikano, Jun Ikari, Takahiro Nakajima, Masayuki Ota, Yuki Shiko, Akira Naito, Mitsuhiro Abe, Takeshi Kawasaki, Jun-Ichiro Ikeda, Yoshihito Ozawa, Takuji Suzuki
{"title":"Franseen needle in endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration: a phase II prospective study.","authors":"Kohei Shikano, Jun Ikari, Takahiro Nakajima, Masayuki Ota, Yuki Shiko, Akira Naito, Mitsuhiro Abe, Takeshi Kawasaki, Jun-Ichiro Ikeda, Yoshihito Ozawa, Takuji Suzuki","doi":"10.1093/jjco/hyae077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) has been used to diagnose and stage lung cancer. Acquire™ Pulmonary and Expect™ Pulmonary dedicated EBUS-TBNA needles were introduced as the Franseen and Lancet needles, respectively. It is still unclear whether the Franseen or Lancet needles yield a higher quality specimen especially focusing on next-generation sequencing-based molecular testing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center, prospective study performed at the Chiba University Hospital randomly assigned patients to two groups: Group A, wherein the first and second EBUS-TBNA were performed using Lancet and Franseen needles, respectively, and Group B, wherein the first and second EBUS-TBNA were performed using Franseen and Lancet needles, respectively. Each specimen was compared and analyzed pathologically. The primary outcome was the histological tissue area except blood clot and the cellularity of each sample. We also examined the success rate of molecular testing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve patients who underwent EBUS-TBNA between November 2022 and February 2023 were enrolled in this study. The tissue area of the specimens obtained by the Franseen and Lancet needles was 13.3 ± 6.4 mm2 and 10.6 ± 6.3 mm2, respectively (P = .355). The tumor cellularity in the specimens obtained using the Franseen and Lancet needles was 54.0 ± 30.3 and 46.2 ± 36.3%, respectively (P = .608). The success rate of molecular testing using the single-pass sample by Franseen needle was 85.7 and 57.1% by Lancet needle. No serious complications were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Franseen needle tended to show a greater amount of specimen with higher tumor cellularity than the Lancet needle which may contribute higher success rate of molecular testing. Further studies must be conducted to validate the results of this study.</p><p><strong>Key findings: </strong>What is known and what is new?  What is the implication, and what should change now?</p>","PeriodicalId":14656,"journal":{"name":"Japanese journal of clinical oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11375049/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese journal of clinical oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyae077","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) has been used to diagnose and stage lung cancer. Acquire™ Pulmonary and Expect™ Pulmonary dedicated EBUS-TBNA needles were introduced as the Franseen and Lancet needles, respectively. It is still unclear whether the Franseen or Lancet needles yield a higher quality specimen especially focusing on next-generation sequencing-based molecular testing.

Methods: A single-center, prospective study performed at the Chiba University Hospital randomly assigned patients to two groups: Group A, wherein the first and second EBUS-TBNA were performed using Lancet and Franseen needles, respectively, and Group B, wherein the first and second EBUS-TBNA were performed using Franseen and Lancet needles, respectively. Each specimen was compared and analyzed pathologically. The primary outcome was the histological tissue area except blood clot and the cellularity of each sample. We also examined the success rate of molecular testing.

Results: Twelve patients who underwent EBUS-TBNA between November 2022 and February 2023 were enrolled in this study. The tissue area of the specimens obtained by the Franseen and Lancet needles was 13.3 ± 6.4 mm2 and 10.6 ± 6.3 mm2, respectively (P = .355). The tumor cellularity in the specimens obtained using the Franseen and Lancet needles was 54.0 ± 30.3 and 46.2 ± 36.3%, respectively (P = .608). The success rate of molecular testing using the single-pass sample by Franseen needle was 85.7 and 57.1% by Lancet needle. No serious complications were reported.

Conclusions: The Franseen needle tended to show a greater amount of specimen with higher tumor cellularity than the Lancet needle which may contribute higher success rate of molecular testing. Further studies must be conducted to validate the results of this study.

Key findings: What is known and what is new?  What is the implication, and what should change now?

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
支气管内超声引导下经支气管针吸术中的 Franseen 针:II 期前瞻性研究。
背景:支气管内超声引导下经支气管针吸术(EBUS-TBNA)已被用于肺癌的诊断和分期。Acquire™ Pulmonary 和 Expect™ Pulmonary 专用 EBUS-TBNA 针分别作为 Franseen 针和 Lancet 针问世。目前还不清楚 Franseen 针和 Lancet 针是否能产生更高质量的标本,尤其是基于下一代测序的分子检测:在千叶大学医院进行的一项单中心前瞻性研究将患者随机分为两组:A组分别使用Lancet针和Franseen针进行第一次和第二次EBUS-TBNA检查,B组分别使用Franseen针和Lancet针进行第一次和第二次EBUS-TBNA检查。对每个标本进行比较和病理分析。主要结果是每个样本的组织学组织面积(血块除外)和细胞度。我们还检查了分子检测的成功率:本研究共纳入了 2022 年 11 月至 2023 年 2 月期间接受 EBUS-TBNA 治疗的 12 例患者。弗兰森针和柳叶刀针获得的标本组织面积分别为(13.3 ± 6.4)平方毫米和(10.6 ± 6.3)平方毫米(P = .355)。使用弗朗森针和柳叶刀针获得的标本的肿瘤细胞度分别为 54.0 ± 30.3% 和 46.2 ± 36.3%(P = .608)。使用 Franseen 针进行单次样本分子检测的成功率为 85.7%,使用 Lancet 针的成功率为 57.1%。无严重并发症报告:与柳叶刀针相比,Franseen针往往能显示出更多肿瘤细胞度更高的标本,这可能有助于提高分子检测的成功率。必须开展进一步研究来验证本研究的结果:哪些是已知的,哪些是新的? 有什么影响,现在应该做些什么改变?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
177
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology is a multidisciplinary journal for clinical oncologists which strives to publish high quality manuscripts addressing medical oncology, clinical trials, radiology, surgery, basic research, and palliative care. The journal aims to contribute to the world"s scientific community with special attention to the area of clinical oncology and the Asian region. JJCO publishes various articles types including: ・Original Articles ・Case Reports ・Clinical Trial Notes ・Cancer Genetics Reports ・Epidemiology Notes ・Technical Notes ・Short Communications ・Letters to the Editors ・Solicited Reviews
期刊最新文献
Protocol digest of a phase III randomized trial of gross total resection versus possible resection of fluid-attenuated inversion recovery-hyperintense lesion on MRI for newly diagnosed supratentorial glioblastoma: JCOG2209 (FLAMINGO). COVID-19 in patients receiving treatment at an outpatient chemotherapy unit. The effect of epidermal growth factor receptor mutation on adjuvant chemotherapy with tegafur/uracil for patients with completely resected, non-lymph node metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (> 2 cm): a multicenter, retrospective, observational study as exploratory analysis of the CSPOR-LC03 study. Preoperative prediction of early mortality after surgery for spinal metastases. Salvage radiotherapy for locoregional recurrence of esophageal cancer after surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1