Effectiveness of a Population Health Intervention on Disparities in Hypertension Control: A Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of General Internal Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-12 DOI:10.1007/s11606-024-08839-y
Andrew S Hwang, Yuchiao Chang, Sarah Matathia, Suzanne Brodney, Michael J Barry, Daniel M Horn
{"title":"Effectiveness of a Population Health Intervention on Disparities in Hypertension Control: A Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Andrew S Hwang, Yuchiao Chang, Sarah Matathia, Suzanne Brodney, Michael J Barry, Daniel M Horn","doi":"10.1007/s11606-024-08839-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Disparities in hypertension control across race, ethnicity, and language have been a long-standing problem in the United States.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess whether a multi-pronged intervention can improve hypertension control for a target population and reduce disparities.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This stepped wedge cluster randomized trial was conducted at 15 adult primary care clinics affiliated with Massachusetts General Hospital. PCPs were randomized to receive the intervention in twelve groups.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>The target population was patients who met one of the following criteria based on self-identification: (1) Asian, Black, Indigenous, multi-racial, or other race; (2) Hispanic ethnicity; or (3) preferred language other than English. Reference population was White, English-speaking patients.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>PCPs were given access to an online equity dashboard that displays disparities in chronic disease management and completed an equity huddle with population health coordinators (PHCs), which involved reviewing target patients whose hypertension was not well controlled. In addition, community health workers (CHWs) were available in some practices to offer additional support.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>The primary outcome was change in the proportion of target patients meeting the hypertension control goal when comparing intervention and control periods.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>Of the 365 PCPs who were randomized, 311 PCPs and their 10,865 target patients were included in the analysis. The intervention led to an increase in hypertension control in the target population (RD 0.9%; 95% CI [0.3,1.5]) and there was a higher intervention effect in the target population compared to the reference population (DiD 2.1%; 95% CI [1.1, 3.1]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Utilizing data on disparities in quality outcome measures in routine clinical practice augmented by clinical support provided by PHCs and CHWs led to modest, but statistically significant, improvement in hypertension control among BIPOC, Hispanic, and LEP patients.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05278806.</p>","PeriodicalId":15860,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"3028-3034"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11576672/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-024-08839-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Disparities in hypertension control across race, ethnicity, and language have been a long-standing problem in the United States.

Objective: To assess whether a multi-pronged intervention can improve hypertension control for a target population and reduce disparities.

Design: This stepped wedge cluster randomized trial was conducted at 15 adult primary care clinics affiliated with Massachusetts General Hospital. PCPs were randomized to receive the intervention in twelve groups.

Participants: The target population was patients who met one of the following criteria based on self-identification: (1) Asian, Black, Indigenous, multi-racial, or other race; (2) Hispanic ethnicity; or (3) preferred language other than English. Reference population was White, English-speaking patients.

Interventions: PCPs were given access to an online equity dashboard that displays disparities in chronic disease management and completed an equity huddle with population health coordinators (PHCs), which involved reviewing target patients whose hypertension was not well controlled. In addition, community health workers (CHWs) were available in some practices to offer additional support.

Main measures: The primary outcome was change in the proportion of target patients meeting the hypertension control goal when comparing intervention and control periods.

Key results: Of the 365 PCPs who were randomized, 311 PCPs and their 10,865 target patients were included in the analysis. The intervention led to an increase in hypertension control in the target population (RD 0.9%; 95% CI [0.3,1.5]) and there was a higher intervention effect in the target population compared to the reference population (DiD 2.1%; 95% CI [1.1, 3.1]).

Conclusions: Utilizing data on disparities in quality outcome measures in routine clinical practice augmented by clinical support provided by PHCs and CHWs led to modest, but statistically significant, improvement in hypertension control among BIPOC, Hispanic, and LEP patients.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05278806.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人群健康干预对高血压控制差异的影响:阶梯式楔形集群随机临床试验》。
背景:在美国,不同种族、族裔和语言在高血压控制方面的差异是一个长期问题:在美国,不同种族、族裔和语言的人群在高血压控制方面的差异是一个长期存在的问题:评估多管齐下的干预措施能否改善目标人群的高血压控制情况并减少差异:这项阶梯式楔形分组随机试验在马萨诸塞州总医院下属的 15 家成人初级保健诊所进行。初级保健医生被随机分为 12 组接受干预:目标人群是根据自我认同符合以下标准之一的患者:(1)亚裔、黑人、土著人、多种族或其他种族;(2)西班牙裔;或(3)首选语言为英语以外的语言。参照人群为讲英语的白人患者:初级保健医生可访问在线公平仪表板,该仪表板可显示慢性病管理中的差异,初级保健医生还可与人口健康协调员(PHC)一起完成公平会议,其中包括审查高血压未得到良好控制的目标患者。此外,社区保健员(CHWs)也会在一些诊所提供额外支持:主要结果:干预期与对照期相比,达到高血压控制目标的目标患者比例发生了变化:在接受随机干预的 365 名初级保健医生中,有 311 名初级保健医生及其 10,865 名目标患者被纳入分析范围。干预措施提高了目标人群的高血压控制率(RD 0.9%;95% CI [0.3,1.5]),与参照人群相比,目标人群的干预效果更高(DiD 2.1%;95% CI [1.1,3.1]):结论:在常规临床实践中利用质量结果测量的差异数据,并辅以初级保健中心和社区保健员提供的临床支持,可适度改善黑人、西班牙裔和菲律宾裔患者的高血压控制情况,但在统计学上有显著意义:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:NCT05278806。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Journal of General Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
749
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of General Internal Medicine is the official journal of the Society of General Internal Medicine. It promotes improved patient care, research, and education in primary care, general internal medicine, and hospital medicine. Its articles focus on topics such as clinical medicine, epidemiology, prevention, health care delivery, curriculum development, and numerous other non-traditional themes, in addition to classic clinical research on problems in internal medicine.
期刊最新文献
Identifying Demographic Trends in the Use of Audio-Video and Audio-Only Telehealth by Arizona Medicaid Beneficiaries Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Private Equity Penetration in Behavioral Health in the United States, 2010-2022. Approach to Estimating Adherence to Heart Failure Medications Using Linked Electronic Health Record and Pharmacy Data. National Survey of Factors Associated with Physician Antibiotic Prescribing Preferences. Antipsychotics and Risk of Acute Respiratory Failure in U.S. Medicare Beneficiaries with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1