Scoping review: Mobility aids for people with sight loss across the ICF domains of functions, activities, and participation.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY Optometry and Vision Science Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-12 DOI:10.1097/OPX.0000000000002141
Holly M Knights, Alex E Benham, Rachael M Durrans, Kim Burton
{"title":"Scoping review: Mobility aids for people with sight loss across the ICF domains of functions, activities, and participation.","authors":"Holly M Knights, Alex E Benham, Rachael M Durrans, Kim Burton","doi":"10.1097/OPX.0000000000002141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Significance: </strong>There is little literature linking mobility aids for people with sight loss to the functions, activities, and participation domains of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Future studies on this relationship should be funded and pursued to better understand ways to maximize the benefit of mobility aids.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The ICF domains of functions, activities, and participation are potentially health-supporting aspects of daily living that may be impeded for people with sight loss. Although mobility aids facilitate safely navigating obstacles to optimize independence, it is not clear if they have any effect on functions, activities, or participation. This review explores the current literature to establish the associations between mobility aids and ICF domains.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An established scoping review methodological framework was used to systematically search, select, and synthesize the existing literature.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 116 unique retrieved articles, three observational studies were eligible for inclusion with a total of 124 participants. A small experimental study found that blind adults had slower Timed Up and Go times than sighted and better performance with a long cane than without. One observational study found that physical activity was strongly related to level of visual acuity but with no independent impact of mobility aids. A single mixed-methods study explored travel frequency for blind people with assistance dogs and considered constraints to participation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite the included studies involving some aspect of mobility aid use by people with sight loss, to date, no study has focused exclusively on mobility aid intervention for people with sight loss within the physical function, physical activity, and participation domains of the ICF. There is no reliable evidence on the associations between mobility aids and physical function, physical activity, and participation. This is an important knowledge gap for determining the most suitable aids, as well as their use, to best facilitate health-supporting activities.</p>","PeriodicalId":19649,"journal":{"name":"Optometry and Vision Science","volume":" ","pages":"388-392"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Optometry and Vision Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0000000000002141","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Significance: There is little literature linking mobility aids for people with sight loss to the functions, activities, and participation domains of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Future studies on this relationship should be funded and pursued to better understand ways to maximize the benefit of mobility aids.

Purpose: The ICF domains of functions, activities, and participation are potentially health-supporting aspects of daily living that may be impeded for people with sight loss. Although mobility aids facilitate safely navigating obstacles to optimize independence, it is not clear if they have any effect on functions, activities, or participation. This review explores the current literature to establish the associations between mobility aids and ICF domains.

Methods: An established scoping review methodological framework was used to systematically search, select, and synthesize the existing literature.

Results: Of 116 unique retrieved articles, three observational studies were eligible for inclusion with a total of 124 participants. A small experimental study found that blind adults had slower Timed Up and Go times than sighted and better performance with a long cane than without. One observational study found that physical activity was strongly related to level of visual acuity but with no independent impact of mobility aids. A single mixed-methods study explored travel frequency for blind people with assistance dogs and considered constraints to participation.

Conclusions: Despite the included studies involving some aspect of mobility aid use by people with sight loss, to date, no study has focused exclusively on mobility aid intervention for people with sight loss within the physical function, physical activity, and participation domains of the ICF. There is no reliable evidence on the associations between mobility aids and physical function, physical activity, and participation. This is an important knowledge gap for determining the most suitable aids, as well as their use, to best facilitate health-supporting activities.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
范围界定审查:在《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》的功能、活动和参与领域中为视力丧失者提供助行器具。
意义重大:很少有文献将视力丧失者的助行器具与《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》(ICF)中的功能、活动和参与领域联系起来。目的:《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》(ICF)中的功能、活动和参与领域是视力丧失者日常生活中可能会受到阻碍的潜在健康支持方面。尽管助行器具可以帮助视力丧失者安全地绕过障碍物,从而最大限度地提高其独立性,但目前尚不清楚助行器具是否会对视力丧失者的功能、活动或参与产生任何影响。本综述探讨了当前的文献,以确定助行器具与 ICF 领域之间的关联:方法:采用既定的范围综述方法框架对现有文献进行系统检索、筛选和综合:在检索到的 116 篇文章中,有三项观察性研究符合纳入条件,共有 124 人参与。一项小型实验研究发现,成年盲人的定时上下楼时间比明眼人慢,使用长手杖时比不使用长手杖时表现更好。一项观察性研究发现,体力活动与视力水平密切相关,但与助行器的影响无关。一项混合方法研究探讨了盲人携带助行犬的出行频率,并考虑了参与的限制因素:结论:尽管纳入的研究涉及视力丧失者使用助行器具的某些方面,但迄今为止,还没有研究专门针对视力丧失者在《国际功能、残疾和健康分类》的身体功能、身体活动和参与领域中使用助行器具的情况。关于助行器具与身体功能、身体活动和参与之间的关系,目前还没有可靠的证据。这对于确定最合适的助行器具及其使用方法,从而更好地促进健康支持活动来说,是一个重要的知识缺口。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Optometry and Vision Science
Optometry and Vision Science 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
7.10%
发文量
210
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Optometry and Vision Science is the monthly peer-reviewed scientific publication of the American Academy of Optometry, publishing original research since 1924. Optometry and Vision Science is an internationally recognized source for education and information on current discoveries in optometry, physiological optics, vision science, and related fields. The journal considers original contributions that advance clinical practice, vision science, and public health. Authors should remember that the journal reaches readers worldwide and their submissions should be relevant and of interest to a broad audience. Topical priorities include, but are not limited to: clinical and laboratory research, evidence-based reviews, contact lenses, ocular growth and refractive error development, eye movements, visual function and perception, biology of the eye and ocular disease, epidemiology and public health, biomedical optics and instrumentation, novel and important clinical observations and treatments, and optometric education.
期刊最新文献
Efficacy comparison of repeated low-level red-light therapy and orthokeratology lenses for myopia control. Exploring cognitive overload in adults with visual impairment: The association between concentration and fatigue. A pilot study of the impact of repeated blink refrainment on ocular surface temperature and the interblink period. Case report: Acute macular neuroretinopathy post-COVID-19 infection. Extended release of ciprofloxacin from commercial silicone-hydrogel and conventional hydrogel contact lenses containing vitamin E diffusion barriers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1