Online Cognitive Stimulation Therapy for Dementia in Brazil and India: Acceptability, Feasibility, and Lessons for Implementation.

IF 5 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY JMIR Aging Pub Date : 2024-06-11 DOI:10.2196/55557
Emily Fisher, Shreenila Venkatesan, Pedro Benevides, Elodie Bertrand, Paula Schimidt Brum, Céline El Baou, Cleusa P Ferri, Jane Fossey, Maria Jelen, Jerson Laks, Lisa Liu, Daniel C Mograbi, Nirupama Natarajan, Renata Naylor, Despina Pantouli, Vaishnavi Ramanujam, Thara Rangaswamy, Raquel L Santos de Carvalho, Charlotte Stoner, Sridhar Vaitheswaran, Aimee Spector
{"title":"Online Cognitive Stimulation Therapy for Dementia in Brazil and India: Acceptability, Feasibility, and Lessons for Implementation.","authors":"Emily Fisher, Shreenila Venkatesan, Pedro Benevides, Elodie Bertrand, Paula Schimidt Brum, Céline El Baou, Cleusa P Ferri, Jane Fossey, Maria Jelen, Jerson Laks, Lisa Liu, Daniel C Mograbi, Nirupama Natarajan, Renata Naylor, Despina Pantouli, Vaishnavi Ramanujam, Thara Rangaswamy, Raquel L Santos de Carvalho, Charlotte Stoner, Sridhar Vaitheswaran, Aimee Spector","doi":"10.2196/55557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cognitive stimulation therapy (CST) is an evidence-based, group psychosocial intervention for people with dementia, and it has a positive impact on cognition and quality of life. CST has been culturally adapted for use globally. It was developed as a face-to-face intervention but has recently been adapted for online delivery.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this study, we aimed to explore the feasibility and acceptability of online or virtual CST (vCST) delivery in India and Brazil, emphasizing barriers and facilitators to implementation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-group, multisite, mixed methods, feasibility study was conducted, with nested qualitative interviews. Primary feasibility outcomes were recruitment rate, attendance, attrition, acceptability, and outcome measure completion. Exploratory pre- and postintervention measures, including cognition and quality of life, were assessed. Qualitative interviews were conducted with people with dementia, family caregivers, and group and organizational leaders following intervention delivery, and the data were analyzed using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 17 vCST group sessions with 59 participants were conducted for 7 weeks, with 53% (31/59) of participants attending all 14 sessions. Attrition rate was 7% (4/59), and outcome measure completion rate at follow-up was 68% (40/59). Interviews took place with 36 stakeholders. vCST was acceptable to participants and group leaders and enabled vital access to services during pandemic restrictions. While online services broadened geographic access, challenges emerged concerning inadequate computer literacy, poor technology access, and establishing interpersonal connections online. Exploratory, uncontrolled analyses indicated positive trends in quality of life but negative trends in cognition and activities of daily living, but these results were not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>vCST demonstrated feasibility and acceptability, serving as a crucial resource during the pandemic but raised challenges related to technology access, computer literacy, and long-term implementation. The study highlights the potential of vCST while emphasizing ongoing development and solutions to address implementation challenges.</p>","PeriodicalId":36245,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Aging","volume":"7 ","pages":"e55557"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11200045/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Aging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/55557","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cognitive stimulation therapy (CST) is an evidence-based, group psychosocial intervention for people with dementia, and it has a positive impact on cognition and quality of life. CST has been culturally adapted for use globally. It was developed as a face-to-face intervention but has recently been adapted for online delivery.

Objective: In this study, we aimed to explore the feasibility and acceptability of online or virtual CST (vCST) delivery in India and Brazil, emphasizing barriers and facilitators to implementation.

Methods: A single-group, multisite, mixed methods, feasibility study was conducted, with nested qualitative interviews. Primary feasibility outcomes were recruitment rate, attendance, attrition, acceptability, and outcome measure completion. Exploratory pre- and postintervention measures, including cognition and quality of life, were assessed. Qualitative interviews were conducted with people with dementia, family caregivers, and group and organizational leaders following intervention delivery, and the data were analyzed using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.

Results: A total of 17 vCST group sessions with 59 participants were conducted for 7 weeks, with 53% (31/59) of participants attending all 14 sessions. Attrition rate was 7% (4/59), and outcome measure completion rate at follow-up was 68% (40/59). Interviews took place with 36 stakeholders. vCST was acceptable to participants and group leaders and enabled vital access to services during pandemic restrictions. While online services broadened geographic access, challenges emerged concerning inadequate computer literacy, poor technology access, and establishing interpersonal connections online. Exploratory, uncontrolled analyses indicated positive trends in quality of life but negative trends in cognition and activities of daily living, but these results were not statistically significant.

Conclusions: vCST demonstrated feasibility and acceptability, serving as a crucial resource during the pandemic but raised challenges related to technology access, computer literacy, and long-term implementation. The study highlights the potential of vCST while emphasizing ongoing development and solutions to address implementation challenges.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴西和印度的痴呆症在线认知刺激疗法:可接受性、可行性和实施经验。
背景:认知刺激疗法(CST)是一种针对痴呆症患者的循证集体心理干预方法,对认知能力和生活质量有积极影响。认知刺激疗法已在全球范围内进行了文化适应性调整。它最初是作为一种面对面的干预措施而开发的,但最近已被调整为在线提供:在这项研究中,我们旨在探讨在线或虚拟 CST(vCST)在印度和巴西实施的可行性和可接受性,同时强调实施的障碍和促进因素:方法: 我们开展了一项单组、多地点、混合方法的可行性研究,并进行了嵌套定性访谈。主要可行性结果包括招募率、出席率、自然减员率、可接受性和结果测量完成率。对干预前后的探索性测量进行了评估,包括认知和生活质量。在干预实施后,对痴呆症患者、家庭护理人员、小组和组织负责人进行了定性访谈,并使用实施研究综合框架对数据进行了分析:共进行了 17 次 vCST 小组活动,59 名参与者参加了为期 7 周的活动,53%(31/59)的参与者参加了全部 14 次活动。自然减员率为 7%(4/59),后续跟踪的结果测量完成率为 68%(40/59)。vCST 为参与者和小组负责人所接受,并能在大流行限制期间提供重要的服务。虽然在线服务拓宽了获得服务的地域范围,但也出现了一些挑战,如电脑知识不足、技术使用不便以及在网上建立人际联系等。结论:vCST 证明了其可行性和可接受性,在大流行期间发挥了重要的资源作用,但也提出了与技术接入、计算机扫盲和长期实施相关的挑战。这项研究强调了 vCST 的潜力,同时也强调了应对实施挑战的持续开发和解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JMIR Aging
JMIR Aging Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
4.10%
发文量
71
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Subjective Cognitive Concerns are Associated with Worse Performance on Mobile-App Based Cognitive Assessment: An Observational Study in Cognitively Normal Older Adults. Examining Whether Patient Portal and Video Visit Use Differs by Race and Ethnicity Among Older Adults in a US Integrated Health Care Delivery System: Cross-Sectional Electronic Health Record and Survey-Based Study. Exploring the Landscape of Standards and Guidelines in AgeTech Design and Development: Scoping Review and Thematic Analysis. Decoding the Influence of eHealth on Autonomy, Competence, and Relatedness in Older Adults: Qualitative Analysis of Self-Determination Through the Motivational Technology Model. Interrelationships Among Individual Factors, Family Factors, and Quality of Life in Older Chinese Adults: Cross-Sectional Study Using Structural Equation Modeling.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1