A Multicomponent Intervention (POSSIBLE) to Improve Perceived Risk for HIV Among Black Sexual Minority Men: Feasibility and Preliminary Effectiveness Pilot Study.

IF 2.6 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES JMIR Human Factors Pub Date : 2024-06-11 DOI:10.2196/54739
Derek T Dangerfield Ii, Janeane N Anderson, Charleen Wylie, Ricky Bluthenthal, Chris Beyrer, Jason E Farley
{"title":"A Multicomponent Intervention (POSSIBLE) to Improve Perceived Risk for HIV Among Black Sexual Minority Men: Feasibility and Preliminary Effectiveness Pilot Study.","authors":"Derek T Dangerfield Ii, Janeane N Anderson, Charleen Wylie, Ricky Bluthenthal, Chris Beyrer, Jason E Farley","doi":"10.2196/54739","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Increased pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use is urgently needed to substantially decrease HIV incidence among Black sexual minority men. Low perceived risk for HIV (PRH) is a key unaddressed PrEP barrier for Black sexual minority men. Peers and smartphone apps are popular intervention tools to promote community health behaviors, but few studies have used these together in a multicomponent strategy. Therefore, we designed a multicomponent intervention called POSSIBLE that used an existing smartphone app called PrEPme (Emocha Mobile Health, Inc) and a peer change agent (PCA) to increase PRH as a gateway to PrEP.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This paper aims to describe the feasibility and preliminary impact of POSSIBLE on PRH and willingness to accept a PrEP referral among Black sexual minority men.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>POSSIBLE was a theoretically guided, single-group, 2-session pilot study conducted among Black sexual minority men from Baltimore, Maryland between 2019 and 2021 (N=69). POSSIBLE integrated a PCA and the PrEPme app that allows users to self-monitor sexual risk behaviors and chat with the in-app community health worker to obtain PrEP service information. PRH was assessed using the 8-item PRH scale before and after baseline and follow-up study visits. At the end of each study visit, the PCA referred interested individuals to the community health worker to learn more about PrEP service options.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average age of participants was 32.5 (SD 8.1, range 19-62) years. In total, 55 (80%) participants were retained for follow-up at month 1. After baseline sessions, 29 (42%) participants were willing to be referred to PrEP services, 20 (69%) of those confirmed scheduled appointments with PrEP care teams. There were no statistically significant differences in PRH between baseline and follow-up visits (t<sub>122</sub>=-1.36; P=.17).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We observed no statistically significant improvement in PRH between baseline and month 1. However, given the high retention rate and acceptability, POSSIBLE may be feasible to implement. Future research should test a statistically powered peer-based approach on PrEP initiation among Black sexual minority men.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04533386; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04533386.</p>","PeriodicalId":36351,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Human Factors","volume":"11 ","pages":"e54739"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11200034/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Human Factors","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/54739","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Increased pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use is urgently needed to substantially decrease HIV incidence among Black sexual minority men. Low perceived risk for HIV (PRH) is a key unaddressed PrEP barrier for Black sexual minority men. Peers and smartphone apps are popular intervention tools to promote community health behaviors, but few studies have used these together in a multicomponent strategy. Therefore, we designed a multicomponent intervention called POSSIBLE that used an existing smartphone app called PrEPme (Emocha Mobile Health, Inc) and a peer change agent (PCA) to increase PRH as a gateway to PrEP.

Objective: This paper aims to describe the feasibility and preliminary impact of POSSIBLE on PRH and willingness to accept a PrEP referral among Black sexual minority men.

Methods: POSSIBLE was a theoretically guided, single-group, 2-session pilot study conducted among Black sexual minority men from Baltimore, Maryland between 2019 and 2021 (N=69). POSSIBLE integrated a PCA and the PrEPme app that allows users to self-monitor sexual risk behaviors and chat with the in-app community health worker to obtain PrEP service information. PRH was assessed using the 8-item PRH scale before and after baseline and follow-up study visits. At the end of each study visit, the PCA referred interested individuals to the community health worker to learn more about PrEP service options.

Results: The average age of participants was 32.5 (SD 8.1, range 19-62) years. In total, 55 (80%) participants were retained for follow-up at month 1. After baseline sessions, 29 (42%) participants were willing to be referred to PrEP services, 20 (69%) of those confirmed scheduled appointments with PrEP care teams. There were no statistically significant differences in PRH between baseline and follow-up visits (t122=-1.36; P=.17).

Conclusions: We observed no statistically significant improvement in PRH between baseline and month 1. However, given the high retention rate and acceptability, POSSIBLE may be feasible to implement. Future research should test a statistically powered peer-based approach on PrEP initiation among Black sexual minority men.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04533386; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04533386.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项多成分干预措施(POSSIBLE),旨在改善黑人少数性取向男性的艾滋病感知风险:可行性和初步效果试点研究》。
背景:亟需增加暴露前预防疗法(PrEP)的使用,以大幅降低黑人性少数群体男性的艾滋病发病率。对于黑人性少数群体男性来说,低HIV感知风险(PRH)是PrEP尚未解决的一个关键障碍。同龄人和智能手机应用程序是促进社区健康行为的流行干预工具,但很少有研究在多成分策略中同时使用这些工具。因此,我们设计了一种名为 "POSSIBLE "的多组分干预措施,利用现有的智能手机应用程序 PrEPme(Emocha Mobile Health, Inc)和同伴改变代理(PCA)来增加 PRH,以此作为获得 PrEP 的途径:本文旨在描述 POSSIBLE 在黑人性少数群体男性中的可行性以及对 PRH 和接受 PrEP 转介意愿的初步影响:POSSIBLE 是一项理论指导下的单组 2 次课试点研究,于 2019 年至 2021 年间在马里兰州巴尔的摩市的黑人性少数群体男性中开展(N=69)。POSSIBLE 整合了 PCA 和 PrEPme 应用程序,允许用户自我监控性风险行为,并与应用程序内的社区卫生工作者聊天以获取 PrEP 服务信息。在基线和后续研究访问前后,使用 8 项 PRH 量表对 PRH 进行评估。在每次研究访问结束时,PCA 都会将感兴趣的人推荐给社区保健员,以了解更多有关 PrEP 服务的选择:参与者的平均年龄为 32.5 岁(SD 8.1,范围为 19-62 岁)。基线研究结束后,29 名参与者(42%)愿意接受 PrEP 服务,其中 20 人(69%)确认了与 PrEP 医疗团队的预约。在基线和随访之间,PRH 没有明显的统计学差异(t122=-1.36;P=.17):然而,鉴于 POSSIBLE 的高保留率和可接受性,其实施可能是可行的。未来的研究应该对黑人性少数群体男性中基于同伴的 PrEP 启动方法进行统计学上的测试:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04533386;https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04533386。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JMIR Human Factors
JMIR Human Factors Medicine-Health Informatics
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
123
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Mobility-Based Smartphone Digital Phenotypes for Unobtrusively Capturing Everyday Cognition, Mood, and Community Life-Space in Older Adults: Feasibility, Acceptability, and Preliminary Validity Study. The Promise of AI for Image-Driven Medicine: Qualitative Interview Study of Radiologists' and Pathologists' Perspectives. Mobile App for Improving the Mental Health of Youth in Out-of-Home Care: Development Study Using an Intervention Mapping Approach. German Version of the Telehealth Usability Questionnaire and Derived Short Questionnaires for Usability and Perceived Usefulness in Health Care Assessment in Telehealth and Digital Therapeutics: Instrument Validation Study. Exploring Patient, Proxy, and Clinician Perspectives on the Value and Impact of an Inpatient Portal: A Reflexive Thematic Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1