Exercise effects on cortical excitability in pain populations: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.5 Q3 REHABILITATION Physiotherapy Research International Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1002/pri.2102
Danielle Carolina Pimenta, Alejandra Cardenas-Rojas, Lucas Camargo, Daniel Lima, Julia Kelso, Alba Navarro-Flores, Kevin Pacheco-Barrios, Felipe Fregni
{"title":"Exercise effects on cortical excitability in pain populations: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Danielle Carolina Pimenta, Alejandra Cardenas-Rojas, Lucas Camargo, Daniel Lima, Julia Kelso, Alba Navarro-Flores, Kevin Pacheco-Barrios, Felipe Fregni","doi":"10.1002/pri.2102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) studies examining exercise-induced neuroplasticity in pain populations have produced contradictory findings. We conducted a systematic review to explore how exercise impacts cortical excitability in pain populations using TMS metrics. This review aims to summarize the effect sizes and to understand their sources of heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched multiple databases from inception to December 2022. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with any type of pain population, including acute and chronic pain; exercise interventions were compared to sham exercise or other active interventions. The primary outcomes were TMS metrics, and pain intensity was the secondary outcome. Risk of bias assessment was conducted using the Cochrane tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This review included five RCTs (n = 155). The main diagnoses were fibromyalgia and cervical dystonia. The interventions included submaximal contractions, aerobic exercise, physical therapy, and exercise combined with transcranial direct current stimulation. Three studies are considered to have a high risk of bias. All five studies showed significant pain improvement with exercise. The neurophysiological data revealed improvements in cortical excitability measured by motor-evoked potentials; standardized mean difference = 2.06, 95% confidence interval 1.35-2.78, I<sup>2</sup> = 19%) but no significant differences in resting motor threshold. The data on intracortical inhibition/facilitation (ICI/ICF) was not systematically analyzed, but one study (n = 45) reported higher ICI and lower ICF after exercise.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that exercise interventions positively affect pain relief by modifying corticospinal excitability, but their effects on ICI/ICF are still unclear. While the results are inconclusive, they provide a basis for further exploration in this area of research; future studies should focus on establishing standardized TMS measurements and exercise protocols to ensure consistent and reliable findings. A large-scale RCT that examines various exercise interventions and their effects on cortical excitability could offer valuable insights to optimize its application in promoting neuroplasticity in pain populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":47243,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Research International","volume":"29 3","pages":"e2102"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Research International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.2102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) studies examining exercise-induced neuroplasticity in pain populations have produced contradictory findings. We conducted a systematic review to explore how exercise impacts cortical excitability in pain populations using TMS metrics. This review aims to summarize the effect sizes and to understand their sources of heterogeneity.

Methods: We searched multiple databases from inception to December 2022. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with any type of pain population, including acute and chronic pain; exercise interventions were compared to sham exercise or other active interventions. The primary outcomes were TMS metrics, and pain intensity was the secondary outcome. Risk of bias assessment was conducted using the Cochrane tool.

Results: This review included five RCTs (n = 155). The main diagnoses were fibromyalgia and cervical dystonia. The interventions included submaximal contractions, aerobic exercise, physical therapy, and exercise combined with transcranial direct current stimulation. Three studies are considered to have a high risk of bias. All five studies showed significant pain improvement with exercise. The neurophysiological data revealed improvements in cortical excitability measured by motor-evoked potentials; standardized mean difference = 2.06, 95% confidence interval 1.35-2.78, I2 = 19%) but no significant differences in resting motor threshold. The data on intracortical inhibition/facilitation (ICI/ICF) was not systematically analyzed, but one study (n = 45) reported higher ICI and lower ICF after exercise.

Conclusions: These findings suggest that exercise interventions positively affect pain relief by modifying corticospinal excitability, but their effects on ICI/ICF are still unclear. While the results are inconclusive, they provide a basis for further exploration in this area of research; future studies should focus on establishing standardized TMS measurements and exercise protocols to ensure consistent and reliable findings. A large-scale RCT that examines various exercise interventions and their effects on cortical excitability could offer valuable insights to optimize its application in promoting neuroplasticity in pain populations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
运动对疼痛人群大脑皮层兴奋性的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:有关运动诱导疼痛人群神经可塑性的经颅磁刺激(TMS)研究得出了相互矛盾的结论。我们进行了一项系统性综述,利用 TMS 指标探讨运动如何影响疼痛人群的皮质兴奋性。本综述旨在总结效应大小并了解其异质性来源:我们检索了从开始到 2022 年 12 月的多个数据库。我们纳入了任何类型疼痛人群的随机对照试验(RCT),包括急性和慢性疼痛;运动干预与假运动或其他积极干预进行了比较。主要结果为TMS指标,疼痛强度为次要结果。使用 Cochrane 工具进行了偏倚风险评估:本综述包括五项 RCT(n = 155)。主要诊断为纤维肌痛和颈肌张力障碍。干预措施包括次极限收缩、有氧运动、物理治疗以及运动结合经颅直流电刺激。有三项研究被认为存在较高的偏倚风险。所有五项研究都显示,运动能明显改善疼痛。神经生理学数据显示,通过运动诱发电位测量的皮层兴奋性有所改善;标准化平均差 = 2.06,95% 置信区间为 1.35-2.78,I2 = 19%),但静息运动阈值没有显著差异。关于皮层内抑制/促进(ICI/ICF)的数据未作系统分析,但有一项研究(n = 45)报告称,运动后ICI升高,ICF降低:这些研究结果表明,运动干预可通过改变皮质脊髓兴奋性对疼痛缓解产生积极影响,但其对 ICI/ICF 的影响尚不明确。虽然这些结果尚无定论,但它们为这一研究领域的进一步探索提供了基础;未来的研究应侧重于建立标准化的 TMS 测量和运动方案,以确保研究结果的一致性和可靠性。对各种运动干预及其对大脑皮层兴奋性的影响进行大规模的 RCT 研究,可为优化其在促进疼痛人群神经可塑性方面的应用提供宝贵的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: Physiotherapy Research International is an international peer reviewed journal dedicated to the exchange of knowledge that is directly relevant to specialist areas of physiotherapy theory, practice, and research. Our aim is to promote a high level of scholarship and build on the current evidence base to inform the advancement of the physiotherapy profession. We publish original research on a wide range of topics e.g. Primary research testing new physiotherapy treatments; methodological research; measurement and outcome research and qualitative research of interest to researchers, clinicians and educators. Further, we aim to publish high quality papers that represent the range of cultures and settings where physiotherapy services are delivered. We attract a wide readership from physiotherapists and others working in diverse clinical and academic settings. We aim to promote an international debate amongst the profession about current best evidence based practice. Papers are directed primarily towards the physiotherapy profession, but can be relevant to a wide range of professional groups. The growth of interdisciplinary research is also key to our aims and scope, and we encourage relevant submissions from other professional groups. The journal actively encourages submissions which utilise a breadth of different methodologies and research designs to facilitate addressing key questions related to the physiotherapy practice. PRI seeks to encourage good quality topical debates on a range of relevant issues and promote critical reflection on decision making and implementation of physiotherapy interventions.
期刊最新文献
Analysis of Medical Rehabilitation Needs of 2023 Kahramanmaraş Earthquake Victims: Adıyaman Example. Efficacy of whole body vibration on fascicle length and joint angle in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Efficacy of Action Observation Therapy on Gait, Balance and Mobility Impairments: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Reliability, Concurrent Validity, Responsiveness and Measurement Error of the Portuguese Version of Comprehensive Motor Coordination Scale in Individuals With Parkinson's Disease. Sexual Function and Quality of Life in Individuals Post Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1