Research circles as a method for implementing new services in the public health and welfare system.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-11 DOI:10.1080/17482631.2024.2366087
Birthe Møgster, Ottar Ness, Monika Alvestad Reime
{"title":"Research circles as a method for implementing new services in the public health and welfare system.","authors":"Birthe Møgster, Ottar Ness, Monika Alvestad Reime","doi":"10.1080/17482631.2024.2366087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Co-creation has become a guiding principle in public service innovation, but more knowledge is still needed on overcoming barriers and increasing the effectiveness of co-creation processes. This study explores the research circle method as a concrete methodology for co-creation, and its application within two cases involving the implementation of new services for drug death-bereaved persons in Norway based on new research-based knowledge.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The study followed an action research design. The field notes and audio recordings were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis identified two key dimensions experienced as important for the implementation of the new services when research circles were used as a method for co-creation: 1) the inclusion of participants from different contexts and 2) support structures for service interventions.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Research circles are discussed as an important support structure for promoting public value co-creation that can contribute to increasing stakeholders' capacity for implementing services in the public system, especially when the focus is on the perspectives and interests of stakeholders, such as practitioners and management in public health and welfare services. However, the discussion also points to barriers relating to the co-creation process that need to be considered when planning research circle-based interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":51468,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being","volume":"19 1","pages":"2366087"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11172250/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2024.2366087","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Co-creation has become a guiding principle in public service innovation, but more knowledge is still needed on overcoming barriers and increasing the effectiveness of co-creation processes. This study explores the research circle method as a concrete methodology for co-creation, and its application within two cases involving the implementation of new services for drug death-bereaved persons in Norway based on new research-based knowledge.

Method: The study followed an action research design. The field notes and audio recordings were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.

Results: The analysis identified two key dimensions experienced as important for the implementation of the new services when research circles were used as a method for co-creation: 1) the inclusion of participants from different contexts and 2) support structures for service interventions.

Discussion: Research circles are discussed as an important support structure for promoting public value co-creation that can contribute to increasing stakeholders' capacity for implementing services in the public system, especially when the focus is on the perspectives and interests of stakeholders, such as practitioners and management in public health and welfare services. However, the discussion also points to barriers relating to the co-creation process that need to be considered when planning research circle-based interventions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
将研究圈作为在公共卫生和福利系统中实施新服务的一种方法。
背景:共同创造已成为公共服务创新的指导原则,但在克服障碍和提高共同创造过程的有效性方面仍需要更多的知识。本研究探讨了作为共同创造具体方法的研究圈方法,以及该方法在两个案例中的应用,这两个案例涉及在新的研究知识基础上为挪威的毒品死亡遗属提供新的服务:研究采用行动研究设计。采用反思性主题分析法对现场笔记和录音进行了分析:分析发现,在使用研究圈作为共同创造的方法时,有两个关键方面对新服务的实施非常重要:讨论:讨论:研究圈是促进公共价值共创的重要支持结构,有助于提高利益相关者在公共系统中实施服务的能力,特别是当重点放在利益相关者(如公共卫生和福利服务的从业人员和管理人员)的观点和利益时。不过,讨论也指出了在规划基于研究圈的干预措施时需要考虑的与共同创造过程有关的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
99
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being acknowledges the international and interdisciplinary nature of health-related issues. It intends to provide a meeting-point for studies using rigorous qualitative methodology of significance for issues related to human health and well-being. The aim of the International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being is to support and to shape the emerging field of qualitative studies and to encourage a better understanding of all aspects of human health and well-being.
期刊最新文献
"It takes a lot of sisu to get through it"- managerial experiences of facing adversities during pandemic. A qualitative study on the caregiver burden experience in home reflux enema management of infants with congenital megacolon. Exploring the experiences of female undergraduate nursing students in providing home healthcare to older adults. Lost and changed meaning in life of people with Long Covid: a qualitative study. Perceptions of healthcare providers on benefits, risks and barriers regarding intradialytic exercise among haemodialysis patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1