Comparison of two ablation procedures combined with high ligation and foam sclerotherapy and compression therapy for patients with venous leg ulcers.

Postgraduate medicine Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-13 DOI:10.1080/00325481.2024.2366155
Guofu Zheng, Hailiang Xie, Minggui Lai, Bao Qin, Xiaochun Liu
{"title":"Comparison of two ablation procedures combined with high ligation and foam sclerotherapy and compression therapy for patients with venous leg ulcers.","authors":"Guofu Zheng, Hailiang Xie, Minggui Lai, Bao Qin, Xiaochun Liu","doi":"10.1080/00325481.2024.2366155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare the ablation techniques' efficacy of endovenous microwave ablation (EMA) combined with high ligation (HL), foam sclerotherapy (FS) and compression therapy (CT) and endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) combined with HL-FS-CT in the treatment of VLUs.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>301 consecutive patients with VLUs from 2013 to 2022 in a 3200-bed hospital were intervened by EMA combined with HL-FS-CT and EVLA combined with HL-FS-CT were retrospectively compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred thirty-four patients underwent EMA+HL-FS-CT and 167 patients underwent EVLA+HL-FS-CT. The primary outcome of the ulcer healing time was 1.45(0.75-1.5) months and 1.86(0.5-2.5) months, respectively, in the two groups (HR for ulcer healing was 1.26, 95% CI [0.96-1.66], <i>p</i> = 0.097). Secondary outcomes included that no significant difference was found in ulcer recurrence and GSV recanalization and complications between the two groups, and the postoperative VCSS and AVVQ were significantly lower than the baseline values in the respective groups (<i>p</i> = 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EMA+HL-FS-CT and EVLA+HL-FS-CT are both effective at treating VLUs. Both of the two comprehensive treatments were beneficial to the healing of ulcers, but no evidence showed which one was superior in the ulcer healing time.</p>","PeriodicalId":94176,"journal":{"name":"Postgraduate medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postgraduate medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00325481.2024.2366155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To compare the ablation techniques' efficacy of endovenous microwave ablation (EMA) combined with high ligation (HL), foam sclerotherapy (FS) and compression therapy (CT) and endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) combined with HL-FS-CT in the treatment of VLUs.

Method: 301 consecutive patients with VLUs from 2013 to 2022 in a 3200-bed hospital were intervened by EMA combined with HL-FS-CT and EVLA combined with HL-FS-CT were retrospectively compared.

Results: One hundred thirty-four patients underwent EMA+HL-FS-CT and 167 patients underwent EVLA+HL-FS-CT. The primary outcome of the ulcer healing time was 1.45(0.75-1.5) months and 1.86(0.5-2.5) months, respectively, in the two groups (HR for ulcer healing was 1.26, 95% CI [0.96-1.66], p = 0.097). Secondary outcomes included that no significant difference was found in ulcer recurrence and GSV recanalization and complications between the two groups, and the postoperative VCSS and AVVQ were significantly lower than the baseline values in the respective groups (p = 0.0001).

Conclusion: EMA+HL-FS-CT and EVLA+HL-FS-CT are both effective at treating VLUs. Both of the two comprehensive treatments were beneficial to the healing of ulcers, but no evidence showed which one was superior in the ulcer healing time.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对腿部静脉溃疡患者进行两种消融术联合高位结扎和泡沫硬化剂疗法及压力疗法的比较。
目的:比较静脉腔内微波消融术(EMA)联合高位结扎术(HL)、泡沫硬化剂注射术(FS)和压迫疗法(CT)以及静脉腔内激光消融术(EVLA)联合HL-FS-CT治疗VLU的疗效:方法:对一家拥有3200张床位的医院从2013年至2022年连续接受EMA联合HL-FS-CT和EVLA联合HL-FS-CT干预的301例VLU患者进行回顾性比较:134例患者接受了EMA+HL-FS-CT,167例患者接受了EVLA+HL-FS-CT。两组患者溃疡愈合时间的主要结果分别为 1.45(0.75-1.5)个月和 1.86(0.5-2.5)个月(溃疡愈合的 HR 为 1.26,95% CI [0.96-1.66],p = 0.097)。次要结果包括:两组在溃疡复发、GSV再通和并发症方面无明显差异,术后两组的VCSS和AVVQ明显低于基线值(P = 0.0001):结论:EMA+HL-FS-CT和EVLA+HL-FS-CT都能有效治疗VLU。结论:EMA+HL-FS-CT 和 EVLA+HL-FS-CT 都能有效治疗 VLU,两种综合疗法都有利于溃疡的愈合,但没有证据显示哪种疗法在溃疡愈合时间上更胜一筹。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
National survey on peritonsillar abscess treatment and attitudes toward quinsy tonsillectomy. Sleep quality and perceived stress levels in Chinese patients with minor recurrent aphthous stomatitis: a cross-sectional questionnaire-based survey. Unilateral peroneal neuropathy in a patient following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Non-hemolytic acute transfusion reactions: the impact of patient and blood product characteristics. Professional, educational and psychosocial impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on pediatricians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1