Assessment of hearing sequelae in individuals tested post-trauma.

Çağdaş Savaş, Emin Biçen, Ersoy Doğan, İsmail Özgür Can
{"title":"Assessment of hearing sequelae in individuals tested post-trauma.","authors":"Çağdaş Savaş, Emin Biçen, Ersoy Doğan, İsmail Özgür Can","doi":"10.14744/tjtes.2024.63099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Over 5% of the global population (430 million people) require rehabilitation for hearing loss. Individuals with hearing impairments face significant challenges in business, daily life, and social participation. Hearing loss (HL) and other permanent physical and sensory disabilities escalate dramatically in cases with brain damage and temporal bone trauma associated with head injuries. This study aims to identify the significant risk factors for hearing loss following head trauma, utilizing current data, and discuss the findings in the context of the literature. This could contribute to the development of standard approaches for assessing such cases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study reviewed files and reports from individuals assessed for hearing loss at Dokuz Eylül University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Forensic Medicine. The study included cases that applied at least 12 months post-trauma, between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2022, after their recovery process was completed. Sociodemographic data, types of temporal bone fractures, initial otoscopic examination findings, presence or absence of intracranial injury, type of hearing loss, and audiometry test results for air and bone conduction pure tone threshold averages were evaluated. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS 26.0 (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 244 cases, 177 (72.5%) were male and 67 (27.5%) were female. It was observed that the majority of trauma cases occurred in the 19-40 age group (49.2%; n=120). In the initial otoscopic examinations post-trauma, otorrhagia/otorrhea was the most common finding, both as an isolated symptom (n=59, 24.2%) and when accompanied by other symptoms. No temporal bone fractures were detected in 43 cases (17.6%). Longitudinal fractures were found in 141 cases (57.8%), transverse fractures in 48 (19.7%), and mixed-type fractures in 12 (4.9%). The statistical difference in air conduction and bone conduction pure tone threshold averages between groups with and without intracranial injury was significant (p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Post-traumatic examinations should employ a multidisciplinary approach, adhering to standard medical improvement and assessment timelines. It is essential to verify whether each patient's medical improvement process has reached its maximum potential. We believe that adhering to these recommendations and utilizing standardized classifications for hearing loss will prevent the loss of rights.</p>","PeriodicalId":94263,"journal":{"name":"Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11230046/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2024.63099","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Over 5% of the global population (430 million people) require rehabilitation for hearing loss. Individuals with hearing impairments face significant challenges in business, daily life, and social participation. Hearing loss (HL) and other permanent physical and sensory disabilities escalate dramatically in cases with brain damage and temporal bone trauma associated with head injuries. This study aims to identify the significant risk factors for hearing loss following head trauma, utilizing current data, and discuss the findings in the context of the literature. This could contribute to the development of standard approaches for assessing such cases.

Methods: This retrospective study reviewed files and reports from individuals assessed for hearing loss at Dokuz Eylül University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Forensic Medicine. The study included cases that applied at least 12 months post-trauma, between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2022, after their recovery process was completed. Sociodemographic data, types of temporal bone fractures, initial otoscopic examination findings, presence or absence of intracranial injury, type of hearing loss, and audiometry test results for air and bone conduction pure tone threshold averages were evaluated. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS 26.0 (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences).

Results: Out of 244 cases, 177 (72.5%) were male and 67 (27.5%) were female. It was observed that the majority of trauma cases occurred in the 19-40 age group (49.2%; n=120). In the initial otoscopic examinations post-trauma, otorrhagia/otorrhea was the most common finding, both as an isolated symptom (n=59, 24.2%) and when accompanied by other symptoms. No temporal bone fractures were detected in 43 cases (17.6%). Longitudinal fractures were found in 141 cases (57.8%), transverse fractures in 48 (19.7%), and mixed-type fractures in 12 (4.9%). The statistical difference in air conduction and bone conduction pure tone threshold averages between groups with and without intracranial injury was significant (p<0.001).

Conclusion: Post-traumatic examinations should employ a multidisciplinary approach, adhering to standard medical improvement and assessment timelines. It is essential to verify whether each patient's medical improvement process has reached its maximum potential. We believe that adhering to these recommendations and utilizing standardized classifications for hearing loss will prevent the loss of rights.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估创伤后测试者的听力后遗症。
背景:全球超过 5%的人口(4.3 亿人)需要听力损失康复治疗。有听力障碍的人在商业、日常生活和社会参与方面面临着巨大挑战。与头部受伤相关的脑损伤和颞骨创伤会导致听力损失(HL)和其他永久性身体和感官残疾急剧增加。本研究旨在利用现有数据确定头部创伤后听力损失的重要风险因素,并结合文献对研究结果进行讨论。这将有助于制定评估此类病例的标准方法:这项回顾性研究审查了在 Dokuz Eylül 大学医学院法医系接受听力损失评估的个人档案和报告。研究包括创伤后至少 12 个月的病例,即 2016 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 12 月 31 日期间,在其康复过程结束后申请的病例。研究评估了社会人口学数据、颞骨骨折类型、初步耳镜检查结果、有无颅内损伤、听力损失类型以及气导和骨导纯音阈平均值的听力测试结果。数据分析采用 SPSS 26.0(社会科学统计软件包)进行:在 244 例病例中,177 例(72.5%)为男性,67 例(27.5%)为女性。据观察,大多数外伤病例发生在 19-40 岁年龄组(49.2%;n=120)。在创伤后的初次耳镜检查中,耳出血/闭经是最常见的发现,既有单独的症状(n=59,24.2%),也有伴有其他症状的情况。有 43 例(17.6%)未发现颞骨骨折。发现纵向骨折 141 例(57.8%),横向骨折 48 例(19.7%),混合型骨折 12 例(4.9%)。有颅内损伤组和无颅内损伤组的气导和骨导纯音阈平均值的统计学差异显著(p创伤后检查应采用多学科方法,遵守标准的医疗改善和评估时间表。核实每位患者的医疗改善进程是否已达到最大潜力至关重要。我们相信,坚持这些建议并采用标准化的听力损失分类方法,可以防止权利的丧失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of the protective effects of vanillic and rosmarinic acid on cardiac tissue: Lower limb ischemia-reperfusion model in rats. Comprehensive examination of etiological factors and clinical manifestations of maxillofacial traumas in forensic cases: A five-year retrospective study. Evaluation of the effects of ischemia-reperfusion injury in rat isogenic and allogeneic muscle and skin transplant models. Management of antimicrobial therapy in emergency department admissions and hospitalizations for firearm injuries: A single-center experience. Minimally invasive video-assisted trans-diaphragmatic drainage of a subphrenic complicated abscess.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1