Comparison of the Kron technique and digital manometry for measuring intra-abdominal pressure in emergency department patients diagnosed with ileus.

Merve Unutmaz, Çağdaş Yıldırım, Mehmet Emin Unutmaz, Gül Pamukçu Günaydın, Alp Şener, Şervan Gökhan
{"title":"Comparison of the Kron technique and digital manometry for measuring intra-abdominal pressure in emergency department patients diagnosed with ileus.","authors":"Merve Unutmaz, Çağdaş Yıldırım, Mehmet Emin Unutmaz, Gül Pamukçu Günaydın, Alp Şener, Şervan Gökhan","doi":"10.14744/tjtes.2024.36687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Numerous measurement techniques for intra-abdominal pressure have been explored, with the Kron Technique established as the gold standard. Despite its prominence, the search for alternative methods persists due to its lengthy application time, the requirement for additional equipment, and overall impracticality. This study investigated a quicker, more accessible method for effective intra-abdominal pressure measurement in the emergency department. It aimed to compare intra-abdominal pressure measurements in patients diagnosed with ileus using a digital manometer and the Kron Technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Conducted from October 2022 to February 2023, this single-center, prospective, single-blind method comparison study involved patients diagnosed with ileus at a tertiary emergency department. Intra-abdominal pressure was measured using both the Kron Technique and a digital manometer by separate practitioners blinded to the study results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 30 patients. No statistically significant difference was observed in the intra-abdominal pressure measurements between the two methods (p<0.237). A very strong correlation existed between the two methods (Spearman's Rho = 0.998). Bland-Altman analysis showed a bias value of 0.091 mmHg for the digital manometer, with upper and lower agreement limits of -0.825 and 1.007 mmHg, respectively. The measurement time was significantly shorter with the digital manometer than with the Kron Technique (15 vs. 390.5 seconds; p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We believe that the intra-abdominal pressure measurement technique using a digital manometer is a method that can be effectively employed by healthcare professionals in emergency departments. This technique offers ease of use, requires minimal equipment, provides rapid results, and delivers reliable measurement values compared to the Kron Technique.</p>","PeriodicalId":94263,"journal":{"name":"Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11230050/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2024.36687","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Numerous measurement techniques for intra-abdominal pressure have been explored, with the Kron Technique established as the gold standard. Despite its prominence, the search for alternative methods persists due to its lengthy application time, the requirement for additional equipment, and overall impracticality. This study investigated a quicker, more accessible method for effective intra-abdominal pressure measurement in the emergency department. It aimed to compare intra-abdominal pressure measurements in patients diagnosed with ileus using a digital manometer and the Kron Technique.

Methods: Conducted from October 2022 to February 2023, this single-center, prospective, single-blind method comparison study involved patients diagnosed with ileus at a tertiary emergency department. Intra-abdominal pressure was measured using both the Kron Technique and a digital manometer by separate practitioners blinded to the study results.

Results: The study included 30 patients. No statistically significant difference was observed in the intra-abdominal pressure measurements between the two methods (p<0.237). A very strong correlation existed between the two methods (Spearman's Rho = 0.998). Bland-Altman analysis showed a bias value of 0.091 mmHg for the digital manometer, with upper and lower agreement limits of -0.825 and 1.007 mmHg, respectively. The measurement time was significantly shorter with the digital manometer than with the Kron Technique (15 vs. 390.5 seconds; p<0.001).

Conclusion: We believe that the intra-abdominal pressure measurement technique using a digital manometer is a method that can be effectively employed by healthcare professionals in emergency departments. This technique offers ease of use, requires minimal equipment, provides rapid results, and delivers reliable measurement values compared to the Kron Technique.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较 Kron 技术和数字测压法测量急诊科诊断为回肠梗阻患者的腹内压。
背景:腹腔内压力的测量技术层出不穷,其中克隆技术被公认为黄金标准。尽管其地位显赫,但由于其应用时间长、需要额外的设备以及总体上的不实用性,人们一直在寻找替代方法。本研究探讨了一种更快捷、更方便的方法,可在急诊科有效测量腹压。研究旨在比较使用数字压力计和 Kron 技术对确诊为回肠梗阻患者进行的腹压测量:这项单中心、前瞻性、单盲方法比较研究于 2022 年 10 月至 2023 年 2 月进行,涉及一家三级医院急诊科确诊的回肠症患者。分别由对研究结果保密的医生使用克隆技术和数字压力计测量腹腔内压力:研究包括 30 名患者。结果:该研究包括 30 名患者,两种方法的腹内压测量结果在统计学上无明显差异(p):我们认为,使用数字压力计测量腹腔内压力的技术是急诊科医护人员可以有效使用的一种方法。与克朗技术相比,该技术操作简便,所需设备少,测量结果迅速,测量值可靠。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of the protective effects of vanillic and rosmarinic acid on cardiac tissue: Lower limb ischemia-reperfusion model in rats. Comprehensive examination of etiological factors and clinical manifestations of maxillofacial traumas in forensic cases: A five-year retrospective study. Evaluation of the effects of ischemia-reperfusion injury in rat isogenic and allogeneic muscle and skin transplant models. Management of antimicrobial therapy in emergency department admissions and hospitalizations for firearm injuries: A single-center experience. Minimally invasive video-assisted trans-diaphragmatic drainage of a subphrenic complicated abscess.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1