Efficiency of the estimation of physiologic ability and surgical stress (E-PASS) score in predicting postoperative complications after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Süleyman Bulut, Yalcin Kizilkan, Hüseyin Gültekin, Ali Yasin Ozercan, Burak Köseoğlu, Halil Demirçakan, Tanju Keten, Ünsal Eroğlu, Özer Güzel, Altug Tuncel, Cüneyt Özden
{"title":"Efficiency of the estimation of physiologic ability and surgical stress (E-PASS) score in predicting postoperative complications after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.","authors":"Süleyman Bulut, Yalcin Kizilkan, Hüseyin Gültekin, Ali Yasin Ozercan, Burak Köseoğlu, Halil Demirçakan, Tanju Keten, Ünsal Eroğlu, Özer Güzel, Altug Tuncel, Cüneyt Özden","doi":"10.14744/tjtes.2024.36332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (RARP) is increasingly becoming the standard surgical treatment for prostate cancer. While some risk factors for postoperative complications of RARP have been identified, no scoring model that incorporates both preoperative physical status of the patient and intraoperative risk factors has been developed. The Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress (E-PASS) score was initially described to predict postoperative complications after gastrointestinal surgical procedures. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of the E-PASS score in predicting postoperative complications of RARP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective evaluation was conducted on 204 patients who underwent RARP between 2019 and 2022. Demographic data, parameters indicating patients' preoperative physical condition, and intraoperative risk factors were analyzed. The E-PASS score and subscores were calculated for each patient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the patients, 164 (80.4%) were discharged without any postoperative complications (Group 1), and 40 (19.6%) experienced various degrees of complications (Group 2). Patients in Group 2 had higher rates of previous abdominal surgery, elevated Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance scores, longer surgical durations, and higher E-PASS scores. To assess the effectiveness of the Comprehensive Risk Score (CRS) as a predictive factor for postoperative complications, a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed with a 95% confidence interval (CI), and a cut-off value was established. The cut-off value for CRS was determined to be -0.0345 (area under the curve [AUC]=0.783, CI: 0.713-0.853; p<0.001). Patients with a CRS higher than the cut-off value had a 16.4 times higher rate of postoperative complications after RARP (95% CI: 5.58-48.5).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The E-PASS scoring model successfully predicts postoperative complications in patients undergoing RARP by using preoperative data about the physical status of the patient and surgical risk factors. The E-PASS score and its subscores could be utilized as objective criteria to determine the risk of postoperative complications before and immediately after surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":94263,"journal":{"name":"Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11230049/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2024.36332","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (RARP) is increasingly becoming the standard surgical treatment for prostate cancer. While some risk factors for postoperative complications of RARP have been identified, no scoring model that incorporates both preoperative physical status of the patient and intraoperative risk factors has been developed. The Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress (E-PASS) score was initially described to predict postoperative complications after gastrointestinal surgical procedures. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of the E-PASS score in predicting postoperative complications of RARP.

Methods: A retrospective evaluation was conducted on 204 patients who underwent RARP between 2019 and 2022. Demographic data, parameters indicating patients' preoperative physical condition, and intraoperative risk factors were analyzed. The E-PASS score and subscores were calculated for each patient.

Results: Of the patients, 164 (80.4%) were discharged without any postoperative complications (Group 1), and 40 (19.6%) experienced various degrees of complications (Group 2). Patients in Group 2 had higher rates of previous abdominal surgery, elevated Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance scores, longer surgical durations, and higher E-PASS scores. To assess the effectiveness of the Comprehensive Risk Score (CRS) as a predictive factor for postoperative complications, a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed with a 95% confidence interval (CI), and a cut-off value was established. The cut-off value for CRS was determined to be -0.0345 (area under the curve [AUC]=0.783, CI: 0.713-0.853; p<0.001). Patients with a CRS higher than the cut-off value had a 16.4 times higher rate of postoperative complications after RARP (95% CI: 5.58-48.5).

Conclusion: The E-PASS scoring model successfully predicts postoperative complications in patients undergoing RARP by using preoperative data about the physical status of the patient and surgical risk factors. The E-PASS score and its subscores could be utilized as objective criteria to determine the risk of postoperative complications before and immediately after surgery.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生理能力和手术压力评估(E-PASS)评分在预测机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术术后并发症方面的效率。
背景:机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)正逐渐成为治疗前列腺癌的标准手术方法。虽然已经发现了一些导致 RARP 术后并发症的风险因素,但还没有开发出同时考虑患者术前身体状况和术中风险因素的评分模型。生理能力和手术压力评估(E-PASS)评分最初用于预测胃肠道手术后的并发症。本研究旨在评估 E-PASS 评分在预测 RARP 术后并发症方面的有效性:方法:对2019年至2022年期间接受RARP手术的204名患者进行回顾性评估。分析了人口统计学数据、显示患者术前身体状况的参数以及术中风险因素。计算了每位患者的 E-PASS 分数和子分数:其中,164 名患者(80.4%)术后无并发症出院(第 1 组),40 名患者(19.6%)出现不同程度的并发症(第 2 组)。第2组患者既往接受过腹部手术的比例较高,东部合作肿瘤学组(ECOG)表现评分较高,手术时间较长,E-PASS评分较高。为了评估综合风险评分(CRS)作为术后并发症预测因素的有效性,我们构建了一条带有 95% 置信区间(CI)的接收器操作特征(ROC)曲线,并确定了一个临界值。CRS的临界值被确定为-0.0345(曲线下面积[AUC]=0.783,CI:0.713-0.853;P结论:E-PASS评分模型通过使用术前关于患者身体状况和手术风险因素的数据,成功预测了接受RARP手术患者的术后并发症。E-PASS 评分及其子评分可作为客观标准,用于确定术前和术后并发症的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of the protective effects of vanillic and rosmarinic acid on cardiac tissue: Lower limb ischemia-reperfusion model in rats. Comprehensive examination of etiological factors and clinical manifestations of maxillofacial traumas in forensic cases: A five-year retrospective study. Evaluation of the effects of ischemia-reperfusion injury in rat isogenic and allogeneic muscle and skin transplant models. Management of antimicrobial therapy in emergency department admissions and hospitalizations for firearm injuries: A single-center experience. Minimally invasive video-assisted trans-diaphragmatic drainage of a subphrenic complicated abscess.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1