Bryan M. Delfing, Xavier E. Laracuente, William Jeffries, Xingyu Luo, Audrey Olson, Kenneth W. Foreman, Greg Petruncio, Kyung Hyeon Lee, Mikell Paige, Kylene Kehn-Hall, Christopher Lockhart and Dmitri K. Klimov*,
{"title":"Competitive Binding of Viral Nuclear Localization Signal Peptide and Inhibitor Ligands to Importin-α Nuclear Transport Protein","authors":"Bryan M. Delfing, Xavier E. Laracuente, William Jeffries, Xingyu Luo, Audrey Olson, Kenneth W. Foreman, Greg Petruncio, Kyung Hyeon Lee, Mikell Paige, Kylene Kehn-Hall, Christopher Lockhart and Dmitri K. Klimov*, ","doi":"10.1021/acs.jcim.4c00626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus (VEEV) is a highly virulent pathogen whose nuclear localization signal (NLS) sequence from capsid protein binds to the host importin-α transport protein and blocks nuclear import. We studied the molecular mechanisms by which two small ligands, termed I1 and I2, interfere with the binding of VEEV’s NLS peptide to importin-α protein. To this end, we performed all-atom replica exchange molecular dynamics simulations probing the competitive binding of the VEEV coreNLS peptide and I1 or I2 ligand to the importin-α major NLS binding site. As a reference, we used our previous simulations, which examined noncompetitive binding of the coreNLS peptide or the inhibitors to importin-α. We found that both inhibitors completely abrogate the native binding of the coreNLS peptide, forcing it to adopt a manifold of nonnative loosely bound poses within the importin-α major NLS binding site. Both inhibitors primarily destabilize the native coreNLS binding by masking its amino acids rather than competing with it for binding to importin-α. Because I2, in contrast to I1, binds off-site localizing on the edge of the major NLS binding site, it inhibits fewer coreNLS native binding interactions than I1. Structural analysis is supported by computations of the free energies of the coreNLS peptide binding to importin-α with or without competition from the inhibitors. Specifically, both inhibitors reduce the free energy gain from coreNLS binding, with I1 causing significantly larger loss than I2. To test our simulations, we performed AlphaScreen experiments measuring IC50 values for both inhibitors. Consistent with in silico results, the IC50 value for I1 was found to be lower than that for I2. We hypothesize that the inhibitory action of I1 and I2 ligands might be specific to the NLS from VEEV’s capsid protein.</p>","PeriodicalId":44,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling ","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/epdf/10.1021/acs.jcim.4c00626","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling ","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jcim.4c00626","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus (VEEV) is a highly virulent pathogen whose nuclear localization signal (NLS) sequence from capsid protein binds to the host importin-α transport protein and blocks nuclear import. We studied the molecular mechanisms by which two small ligands, termed I1 and I2, interfere with the binding of VEEV’s NLS peptide to importin-α protein. To this end, we performed all-atom replica exchange molecular dynamics simulations probing the competitive binding of the VEEV coreNLS peptide and I1 or I2 ligand to the importin-α major NLS binding site. As a reference, we used our previous simulations, which examined noncompetitive binding of the coreNLS peptide or the inhibitors to importin-α. We found that both inhibitors completely abrogate the native binding of the coreNLS peptide, forcing it to adopt a manifold of nonnative loosely bound poses within the importin-α major NLS binding site. Both inhibitors primarily destabilize the native coreNLS binding by masking its amino acids rather than competing with it for binding to importin-α. Because I2, in contrast to I1, binds off-site localizing on the edge of the major NLS binding site, it inhibits fewer coreNLS native binding interactions than I1. Structural analysis is supported by computations of the free energies of the coreNLS peptide binding to importin-α with or without competition from the inhibitors. Specifically, both inhibitors reduce the free energy gain from coreNLS binding, with I1 causing significantly larger loss than I2. To test our simulations, we performed AlphaScreen experiments measuring IC50 values for both inhibitors. Consistent with in silico results, the IC50 value for I1 was found to be lower than that for I2. We hypothesize that the inhibitory action of I1 and I2 ligands might be specific to the NLS from VEEV’s capsid protein.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling publishes papers reporting new methodology and/or important applications in the fields of chemical informatics and molecular modeling. Specific topics include the representation and computer-based searching of chemical databases, molecular modeling, computer-aided molecular design of new materials, catalysts, or ligands, development of new computational methods or efficient algorithms for chemical software, and biopharmaceutical chemistry including analyses of biological activity and other issues related to drug discovery.
Astute chemists, computer scientists, and information specialists look to this monthly’s insightful research studies, programming innovations, and software reviews to keep current with advances in this integral, multidisciplinary field.
As a subscriber you’ll stay abreast of database search systems, use of graph theory in chemical problems, substructure search systems, pattern recognition and clustering, analysis of chemical and physical data, molecular modeling, graphics and natural language interfaces, bibliometric and citation analysis, and synthesis design and reactions databases.