Understanding medication recycling practices in Canadian hospitals.

IF 1.5 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY International Journal of Pharmacy Practice Pub Date : 2024-07-04 DOI:10.1093/ijpp/riae026
Brenda Zou, Sophia Sung, Isla Drummond, Linda Tang, Aaron M Tejani
{"title":"Understanding medication recycling practices in Canadian hospitals.","authors":"Brenda Zou, Sophia Sung, Isla Drummond, Linda Tang, Aaron M Tejani","doi":"10.1093/ijpp/riae026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medication recycling within hospitals has proven financial and possible environmental benefits according to local evaluations done in British Columbia. Despite this, the extent of medication recycling in Canadian hospitals remains unclear in the literature.</p><p><strong>Objective(s): </strong>To determine if Canadian hospitals recycle medications, provide an estimate of how much medication is recycled by dosage form, and identify medication recycling barriers through the distribution of a cross-sectional survey.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A nine-question survey was distributed to 171 hospital pharmacy departments across Canada that consented to complete the survey. The survey identified whether sites recycled unused medications, an estimate of how much is recycled based on dosage form, and barriers to recycling.</p><p><strong>Key findings: </strong>Of 62 respondents, the majority indicated they do have medication recycling procedures; however, the frequency of recycling is suboptimal (30-50% of medications are not recycled), and not all medication types are always recycled. Individually packaged oral tablets were most often recycled, and oral liquid medications were least often recycled. Many multi-dose medications were not tamper-proofed. Most respondents selected \"sanitization/infection control\" and \"resource constraint\" as reasons for not recycling all medications.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among respondents, the proportion and type of unused medicines that are recycled varied. For sites that did not respond, this might suggest that medication recycling is not a priority. This could represent a missed opportunity to standardize practices and increase medication recycling in hospitals, both of which could represent a meaningful step towards responsible use of medications and reduction of negative impacts on human health and the environment.</p>","PeriodicalId":14284,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Pharmacy Practice","volume":" ","pages":"311-315"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Pharmacy Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpp/riae026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Medication recycling within hospitals has proven financial and possible environmental benefits according to local evaluations done in British Columbia. Despite this, the extent of medication recycling in Canadian hospitals remains unclear in the literature.

Objective(s): To determine if Canadian hospitals recycle medications, provide an estimate of how much medication is recycled by dosage form, and identify medication recycling barriers through the distribution of a cross-sectional survey.

Methods: A nine-question survey was distributed to 171 hospital pharmacy departments across Canada that consented to complete the survey. The survey identified whether sites recycled unused medications, an estimate of how much is recycled based on dosage form, and barriers to recycling.

Key findings: Of 62 respondents, the majority indicated they do have medication recycling procedures; however, the frequency of recycling is suboptimal (30-50% of medications are not recycled), and not all medication types are always recycled. Individually packaged oral tablets were most often recycled, and oral liquid medications were least often recycled. Many multi-dose medications were not tamper-proofed. Most respondents selected "sanitization/infection control" and "resource constraint" as reasons for not recycling all medications.

Conclusions: Among respondents, the proportion and type of unused medicines that are recycled varied. For sites that did not respond, this might suggest that medication recycling is not a priority. This could represent a missed opportunity to standardize practices and increase medication recycling in hospitals, both of which could represent a meaningful step towards responsible use of medications and reduction of negative impacts on human health and the environment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
了解加拿大医院的药物回收做法。
背景:根据不列颠哥伦比亚省进行的当地评估,医院内的药物回收已被证明具有经济效益和可能的环境效益。尽管如此,文献中仍未明确加拿大医院的药物回收程度:通过发放横断面调查问卷,确定加拿大医院是否回收药物,估算按剂型回收的药物数量,并找出药物回收的障碍:方法:向加拿大境内同意完成调查的 171 家医院药剂部门发放了一份包含九个问题的调查问卷。调查确定了医院是否回收未使用的药物、根据剂型估算的回收量以及回收的障碍:在 62 位受访者中,大多数人表示他们确实有药物回收程序;但是,回收的频率并不理想(30%-50% 的药物没有回收),而且并非所有类型的药物都得到了回收。独立包装的口服片剂最常被回收,而口服液体药物最不常被回收。许多多剂量药物没有防伪措施。大多数受访者选择 "消毒/感染控制 "和 "资源限制 "作为不回收所有药物的原因:在受访者中,回收未使用药品的比例和类型各不相同。对于未做出回应的医疗点而言,这可能表明药品回收并非优先事项。这可能意味着医院错失了规范实践和增加药品回收的机会,而这两者都可能是实现负责任用药和减少对人类健康和环境的负面影响的重要一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
146
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Pharmacy Practice (IJPP) is a Medline-indexed, peer reviewed, international journal. It is one of the leading journals publishing health services research in the context of pharmacy, pharmaceutical care, medicines and medicines management. Regular sections in the journal include, editorials, literature reviews, original research, personal opinion and short communications. Topics covered include: medicines utilisation, medicine management, medicines distribution, supply and administration, pharmaceutical services, professional and patient/lay perspectives, public health (including, e.g. health promotion, needs assessment, health protection) evidence based practice, pharmacy education. Methods include both evaluative and exploratory work including, randomised controlled trials, surveys, epidemiological approaches, case studies, observational studies, and qualitative methods such as interviews and focus groups. Application of methods drawn from other disciplines e.g. psychology, health economics, morbidity are especially welcome as are developments of new methodologies.
期刊最新文献
Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of community pharmacists providing over-the-counter emergency hormonal contraception: a scoping review. Prescription and nonprescription drug misuse and abuse in community pharmacies in Iraq: a cross-sectional survey. Antibiotic prescribing for acute uncomplicated cystitis among community pharmacists in Thailand. Gender and ethnicity bias in generative artificial intelligence text-to-image depiction of pharmacists. Lifeguard Pharmacy: the co-development of a new community pharmacy response service for people in danger from domestic abuse or suicidal ideation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1