Respiratory rate measurement by pressure variation in the high flow nasal cannula-system in healthy volunteers.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-12 DOI:10.1007/s10877-024-01185-8
Jeffrey Miechels, Mark V Koning
{"title":"Respiratory rate measurement by pressure variation in the high flow nasal cannula-system in healthy volunteers.","authors":"Jeffrey Miechels, Mark V Koning","doi":"10.1007/s10877-024-01185-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study tests if the pressure variation in the HFNC-system may allow for monitoring of respiratory rate and the pressure difference during breathing may be a marker of respiratory effort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A HFNC system (Fisher & Paykel Optiflow Thrive 950) was modified by adding a GE Healthcare D-Lite spirometry sensor attached to a respiratory module and a pressure transducer. Participants were instructed to breathe regularly, quickly and slowly during 4 different conditions (HFNC flow 30 l/min and 70 l/min and with an open and closed mouth). Respiratory rate was counted based on pressure variation shown on the monitor graphs and compared with the count by observation of the participant. The pressure difference between inspiration and expiration was tested for correlation with the respiratory rate, as a surrogate marker for respiratory effort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty five participants were included in this study. False detection of apnea in pressure-based measurements occurred in 10% and 11% of the measurements with open mouth position at 30 l/min and 70 l/min HFNC-flow, respectively, but not with a closed mouth. The 95% Limits of Agreement were - 1.85;1.91, -13.72;9,88, -2.25;2.47, -30.32;19.93 for the conditions of 30 l/min -closed mouth, 30 l/min - open mouth, 70 l/min - closed mouth and 70 l/min - open mouth, respectively. There was a correlation between pressure difference and respiratory effort, except for the condition of 30 l/min with open mouth.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The pressure variation in the HFNC system allows for respiratory rate and effort monitoring, but requires further development to increase precision.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05991843).</p>","PeriodicalId":15513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","volume":" ","pages":"1397-1404"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-024-01185-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study tests if the pressure variation in the HFNC-system may allow for monitoring of respiratory rate and the pressure difference during breathing may be a marker of respiratory effort.

Methods: A HFNC system (Fisher & Paykel Optiflow Thrive 950) was modified by adding a GE Healthcare D-Lite spirometry sensor attached to a respiratory module and a pressure transducer. Participants were instructed to breathe regularly, quickly and slowly during 4 different conditions (HFNC flow 30 l/min and 70 l/min and with an open and closed mouth). Respiratory rate was counted based on pressure variation shown on the monitor graphs and compared with the count by observation of the participant. The pressure difference between inspiration and expiration was tested for correlation with the respiratory rate, as a surrogate marker for respiratory effort.

Results: Twenty five participants were included in this study. False detection of apnea in pressure-based measurements occurred in 10% and 11% of the measurements with open mouth position at 30 l/min and 70 l/min HFNC-flow, respectively, but not with a closed mouth. The 95% Limits of Agreement were - 1.85;1.91, -13.72;9,88, -2.25;2.47, -30.32;19.93 for the conditions of 30 l/min -closed mouth, 30 l/min - open mouth, 70 l/min - closed mouth and 70 l/min - open mouth, respectively. There was a correlation between pressure difference and respiratory effort, except for the condition of 30 l/min with open mouth.

Conclusions: The pressure variation in the HFNC system allows for respiratory rate and effort monitoring, but requires further development to increase precision.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05991843).

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过大流量鼻插管系统的压力变化测量健康志愿者的呼吸频率。
目的:本研究测试 HFNC 系统中的压力变化是否可以监测呼吸频率,以及呼吸过程中的压力差是否可以作为呼吸努力的标志:对 HFNC 系统(斐雪派克 Optiflow Thrive 950)进行了改装,在呼吸模块和压力传感器上增加了 GE Healthcare D-Lite 肺活量传感器。在 4 种不同条件下(HFNC 流量为 30 升/分钟和 70 升/分钟,张嘴和闭嘴),指导参与者有规律地快速和缓慢呼吸。根据监护仪图表上显示的压力变化计算呼吸频率,并通过观察参与者来与计算结果进行比较。测试吸气和呼气之间的压力差与呼吸频率的相关性,以此作为呼吸强度的替代指标:本研究共纳入 25 名参与者。在 30 升/分钟和 70 升/分钟 HFNC 流量条件下,分别有 10% 和 11% 的测量结果在张口状态下出现呼吸暂停误检,而闭口状态下则没有。在闭口 30 升/分钟、张口 30 升/分钟、闭口 70 升/分钟和张口 70 升/分钟的条件下,95% 的一致限分别为-1.85;1.91, -13.72;9,88, -2.25;2.47, -30.32;19.93 。除张口 30 升/分钟的情况外,压力差与呼吸强度之间存在相关性:结论:HFNC 系统的压力变化可监测呼吸频率和呼吸强度,但需要进一步开发以提高精确度:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05991843)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.60%
发文量
144
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing is a clinical journal publishing papers related to technology in the fields of anaesthesia, intensive care medicine, emergency medicine, and peri-operative medicine. The journal has links with numerous specialist societies, including editorial board representatives from the European Society for Computing and Technology in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care (ESCTAIC), the Society for Technology in Anesthesia (STA), the Society for Complex Acute Illness (SCAI) and the NAVAt (NAVigating towards your Anaestheisa Targets) group. The journal publishes original papers, narrative and systematic reviews, technological notes, letters to the editor, editorial or commentary papers, and policy statements or guidelines from national or international societies. The journal encourages debate on published papers and technology, including letters commenting on previous publications or technological concerns. The journal occasionally publishes special issues with technological or clinical themes, or reports and abstracts from scientificmeetings. Special issues proposals should be sent to the Editor-in-Chief. Specific details of types of papers, and the clinical and technological content of papers considered within scope can be found in instructions for authors.
期刊最新文献
Automated and reference methods for the calculation of left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral or ejection fraction by non-cardiologists: a systematic review on the agreement of the two methods. Entropy of difference works similarly to permutation entropy for the assessment of anesthesia and sleep EEG despite the lower computational effort. Noninvasive estimation of PaCO2 from volumetric capnography in animals with injured lungs: an Artificial Intelligence approach. Rapid non-invasive measurement of mitochondrial oxygen tension after microneedle pre-treatment: a feasibility study in human volunteers. Electroencephalogram monitoring during anesthesia and critical care: a guide for the clinician.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1