Impact of a Remote Primary Care Telehealth Staffing Model on Primary Care Access in the Veterans Health Administration.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of General Internal Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-12 DOI:10.1007/s11606-024-08835-2
Amy M J O'Shea, Bjarni Haraldsson, Matthew R Augustine, Ariana Shahnazi, Kailey Mulligan, Peter J Kaboli
{"title":"Impact of a Remote Primary Care Telehealth Staffing Model on Primary Care Access in the Veterans Health Administration.","authors":"Amy M J O'Shea, Bjarni Haraldsson, Matthew R Augustine, Ariana Shahnazi, Kailey Mulligan, Peter J Kaboli","doi":"10.1007/s11606-024-08835-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) implemented the Clinical Resource Hub (CRH) program to fill staffing gaps in primary care (PC) clinics via telemedicine and maintain veterans' healthcare access.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate PC wait times before and after CRH implementation.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Comparative interrupted time series analysis among a retrospective observational cohort of PC clinics who did and did not use CRH during pre-implementation (October 2018-September 2019) and post-implementation (October 2019-February 2020) periods.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Clinics completing ≥10 CRH visits per month for 2 consecutive months and propensity matched control clinics.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Two measures of patient access (i.e., established, and new patient wait times) and one measure of clinic capacity (i.e., third next available appointment) were assessed. Clinics using CRH were 1:1 propensity score matched across clinical and demographic characteristics. Comparative interrupted time series models used linear mixed effects regression with random clinic-level intercepts and triple interaction (i.e., CRH use, pre- vs. post-implementation, and time) for trend and point estimations.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>PC clinics using CRH (N = 79) were matched to clinics not using CRH (N = 79). In the 12-month pre-implementation, third next available time increased in CRH clinics (0.16 days/month; 95% CI = [0.07, 0.25]), and decreased in the 5 months post-implementation (-0.58 days/month; 95% CI = [-0.90, -0.27]). Post-implementation third next available time also decreased in control clinics (-0.48 days/month; 95% CI = [-0.81, -0.17]). Comparative differences remained non-significant. There were no statistical differences in established or new patient wait times by CRH user status, CRH implementation, or over time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In a national VHA telemedicine program developed to provide gap coverage for PC clinics, no wait time differences were observed between clinics using and not using CRH services. This hub-and-spoke telemedicine service is an effective model to provide gap coverage while maintaining access. Further investigation of quality and long-term access remains necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":15860,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"2771-2779"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11535148/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-024-08835-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) implemented the Clinical Resource Hub (CRH) program to fill staffing gaps in primary care (PC) clinics via telemedicine and maintain veterans' healthcare access.

Objective: To evaluate PC wait times before and after CRH implementation.

Design: Comparative interrupted time series analysis among a retrospective observational cohort of PC clinics who did and did not use CRH during pre-implementation (October 2018-September 2019) and post-implementation (October 2019-February 2020) periods.

Participants: Clinics completing ≥10 CRH visits per month for 2 consecutive months and propensity matched control clinics.

Main measures: Two measures of patient access (i.e., established, and new patient wait times) and one measure of clinic capacity (i.e., third next available appointment) were assessed. Clinics using CRH were 1:1 propensity score matched across clinical and demographic characteristics. Comparative interrupted time series models used linear mixed effects regression with random clinic-level intercepts and triple interaction (i.e., CRH use, pre- vs. post-implementation, and time) for trend and point estimations.

Key results: PC clinics using CRH (N = 79) were matched to clinics not using CRH (N = 79). In the 12-month pre-implementation, third next available time increased in CRH clinics (0.16 days/month; 95% CI = [0.07, 0.25]), and decreased in the 5 months post-implementation (-0.58 days/month; 95% CI = [-0.90, -0.27]). Post-implementation third next available time also decreased in control clinics (-0.48 days/month; 95% CI = [-0.81, -0.17]). Comparative differences remained non-significant. There were no statistical differences in established or new patient wait times by CRH user status, CRH implementation, or over time.

Conclusions: In a national VHA telemedicine program developed to provide gap coverage for PC clinics, no wait time differences were observed between clinics using and not using CRH services. This hub-and-spoke telemedicine service is an effective model to provide gap coverage while maintaining access. Further investigation of quality and long-term access remains necessary.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
远程初级保健远程医疗人员配备模式对退伍军人健康管理局初级保健服务的影响。
背景:退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)实施了临床资源中心(CRH)计划,通过远程医疗填补初级保健(PC)诊所的人员缺口,并保持退伍军人的医疗保健可及性:评估 CRH 实施前后 PC 等待时间:在实施前(2018 年 10 月至 2019 年 9 月)和实施后(2019 年 10 月至 2020 年 2 月)期间,对使用和未使用 CRH 的 PC 诊所进行回顾性观察队列间断时间序列比较分析:连续2个月每月完成≥10次CRH就诊的诊所和倾向匹配的对照诊所:评估了患者就诊情况的两项指标(即已确诊患者和新患者的等待时间)和诊所接待能力的一项指标(即下一个可预约的第三位患者)。使用 CRH 的诊所在临床和人口统计学特征方面进行了 1:1 的倾向得分匹配。间断时间序列比较模型采用线性混合效应回归法,以随机诊所级截距和三重交互作用(即使用 CRH、实施前与实施后以及时间)进行趋势和点估计:使用 CRH 的 PC 诊所(79 家)与未使用 CRH 的诊所(79 家)进行了配对。在实施 CRH 前的 12 个月中,CRH 诊所的第三次下次可用时间有所增加(0.16 天/月;95% CI = [0.07, 0.25]),而在实施 CRH 后的 5 个月中则有所减少(-0.58 天/月;95% CI = [-0.90, -0.27])。对照组诊所在实施后的第三次下次可用时间也有所减少(-0.48 天/月;95% CI = [-0.81, -0.17])。比较差异仍然不显著。按 CRH 用户身份、CRH 实施情况或随时间推移,老病人或新病人的等待时间没有统计学差异:在为 PC 诊所提供间隙覆盖而开发的全国性 VHA 远程医疗项目中,没有观察到使用和未使用 CRH 服务的诊所在等待时间上存在差异。这种 "中心辐射型 "远程医疗服务是一种有效的模式,既能提供间隙覆盖,又能保持可及性。仍有必要对服务质量和长期可及性进行进一步调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Journal of General Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
749
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of General Internal Medicine is the official journal of the Society of General Internal Medicine. It promotes improved patient care, research, and education in primary care, general internal medicine, and hospital medicine. Its articles focus on topics such as clinical medicine, epidemiology, prevention, health care delivery, curriculum development, and numerous other non-traditional themes, in addition to classic clinical research on problems in internal medicine.
期刊最新文献
Discussing Weight with Patients in Primary Care in Australia: A Mixed Methods Experimental Study. Association of Observation Stays with Clinical Outcomes and Costs in Medicare: An Instrumental Variable Analysis. The Master Adaptive Clinician Educator: A Framework for Future Educational Leaders in Academic Medicine. Empagliflozin in Diuretic-Refractory Ascites (DRAin-Em): Results of a Single-Center Feasibility Study. Effectiveness of a Novel Global Telemedicine Curriculum for Medical Students.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1