[Interindividual variability in patients with visuospatial neglect: a retrospective study].

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Revista de neurologia Pub Date : 2024-06-16 DOI:10.33588/rn.7812.2024085
C Aparicio-López, A García-Rudolph, P Rodríguez-Rajo, R Sánchez-Carrión, A Enseñat-Cantallops, A García-Molina
{"title":"[Interindividual variability in patients with visuospatial neglect: a retrospective study].","authors":"C Aparicio-López, A García-Rudolph, P Rodríguez-Rajo, R Sánchez-Carrión, A Enseñat-Cantallops, A García-Molina","doi":"10.33588/rn.7812.2024085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patients who have suffered a stroke may present with visuospatial neglect (VSN). In clinical practice, different degrees of impairment can be observed among patients with VSN; however, there is no consensus regarding the criteria and tests used to determine them.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aims to classify patients with VSH based on their level of impairment and to study their response to computerized cognitive training.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The sample consisted of 34 patients (19 men and 15 women) with a mean age of 47.59 ± 8.39 years. All patients underwent a neuropsychological exploration protocol composed of specific tests that assess visuospatial attention and others to evaluate multiple cognitive domains. All participants underwent computerized cognitive training consisting of 15 one-hour sessions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A cluster analysis was performed that divided the sample into three groups: group 1: mildly affected VSN (n = 17), group 2: moderately affected VSN (n = 11), and group 3: severely affected VSN (n = 6). Statistically significant differences were found in all tests of the visuospatial attention protocol, both in the pre-treatment and post-treatment evaluation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There are different levels of impairment among patients with VSN, differences that persist after applying computerized cognitive training. These results suggest that the evolution of VSN follows a homogeneous pattern linked to the initial level of impairment. These findings, although preliminary, may be relevant to neurorehabilitation professionals.</p>","PeriodicalId":21281,"journal":{"name":"Revista de neurologia","volume":"78 12","pages":"327-334"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11407465/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de neurologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33588/rn.7812.2024085","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Patients who have suffered a stroke may present with visuospatial neglect (VSN). In clinical practice, different degrees of impairment can be observed among patients with VSN; however, there is no consensus regarding the criteria and tests used to determine them.

Aim: This study aims to classify patients with VSH based on their level of impairment and to study their response to computerized cognitive training.

Patients and methods: The sample consisted of 34 patients (19 men and 15 women) with a mean age of 47.59 ± 8.39 years. All patients underwent a neuropsychological exploration protocol composed of specific tests that assess visuospatial attention and others to evaluate multiple cognitive domains. All participants underwent computerized cognitive training consisting of 15 one-hour sessions.

Results: A cluster analysis was performed that divided the sample into three groups: group 1: mildly affected VSN (n = 17), group 2: moderately affected VSN (n = 11), and group 3: severely affected VSN (n = 6). Statistically significant differences were found in all tests of the visuospatial attention protocol, both in the pre-treatment and post-treatment evaluation.

Conclusions: There are different levels of impairment among patients with VSN, differences that persist after applying computerized cognitive training. These results suggest that the evolution of VSN follows a homogeneous pattern linked to the initial level of impairment. These findings, although preliminary, may be relevant to neurorehabilitation professionals.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[视觉空间忽略症患者的个体间差异:一项回顾性研究]。
导言中风患者可能出现视觉空间忽略(VSN)。在临床实践中,可以观察到 VSN 患者存在不同程度的障碍;然而,对于确定这些障碍的标准和测试,目前还没有达成共识。目的:本研究旨在根据 VSH 患者的障碍程度对其进行分类,并研究他们对计算机认知训练的反应:样本包括 34 名患者(19 名男性和 15 名女性),平均年龄为 47.59 ± 8.39 岁。所有患者都接受了神经心理学探索方案,该方案由评估视觉空间注意力的特定测试和评估多个认知领域的其他测试组成。所有参与者都接受了计算机化认知训练,共 15 次,每次一小时:聚类分析将样本分为三组:第一组:轻度 VSN 患者(17 人);第二组:中度 VSN 患者(11 人);第三组:重度 VSN 患者(6 人)。无论是在治疗前还是在治疗后评估中,视觉空间注意力方案的所有测试均存在统计学意义上的明显差异:结论:VSN 患者存在不同程度的障碍,这种差异在应用计算机认知训练后依然存在。这些结果表明,VSN 的演变遵循一种与最初障碍程度相关的同质模式。这些发现虽然是初步的,但可能与神经康复专业人员有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Revista de neurologia
Revista de neurologia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
8.30%
发文量
117
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Revista de Neurología fomenta y difunde el conocimiento generado en lengua española sobre neurociencia, tanto clínica como experimental.
期刊最新文献
The Efficacy of Boxing Training on Patients with Parkinson's Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. [Referral Profile of Adult Patients Attended in the Neuropsychology Consultation at Hospital Universitario La Paz in Madrid from 2018 to 2023]. [Characteristics of patients with drug-resistant epilepsy in a tertiary hospital]. [Glioblastoma and its interaction with neurogenesis]. [The p-value of a test is not the probability that the null hypothesis is true or false].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1