Safety and Efficacy of Tranexamic Acid in Spinal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 1.2 Q3 SURGERY Spine Surgery and Related Research Pub Date : 2023-12-27 eCollection Date: 2024-05-27 DOI:10.22603/ssrr.2023-0244
Kento Yamanouchi, Haruki Funao, Naruhito Fujita, Shigeto Ebata, Mitsuru Yagi
{"title":"Safety and Efficacy of Tranexamic Acid in Spinal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Kento Yamanouchi, Haruki Funao, Naruhito Fujita, Shigeto Ebata, Mitsuru Yagi","doi":"10.22603/ssrr.2023-0244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tranexamic acid (TXA) has gained popularity in spinal surgery because of its potential to reduce blood loss. However, concerns regarding its safety and efficacy remain. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of TXA in reducing blood loss and its safety profile in spinal surgeries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search was conducted in electronic databases for randomized controlled trials and prospective studies evaluating the use of TXA in spinal surgery. The primary outcomes were intraoperative and total estimated blood loss (EBL), and the secondary outcomes included the incidence and types of complications associated with TXA use. Meta-analyses were performed using random-effects models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen studies involving 1,213 participants were included in the meta-analysis. The use of TXA was associated with significant reductions in both intraoperative (mean difference: -46.56 mL [-73.85, -19.26], p<0.01]) and total EBL (mean difference: -210.17 mL [-284.93, -135.40], p<0.01) while also decreasing the need for blood transfusions (risk ratio: 0.68 [0.51, 0.90], p<0.01). No significant difference was found in the incidence and types of thrombotic complications when TXA was used in spinal surgery. Subgroup analysis showed consistent results in instrumentation and fusion surgery and different doses of TXA.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TXA is effective in reducing intraoperative and overall blood loss in spinal surgery without increasing the risk of complications. These findings support the use of TXA to improve patient outcomes. However, caution should be exercised because of the heterogeneity among the included studies. Further research is needed to confirm these findings and explore potential long-term complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":22253,"journal":{"name":"Spine Surgery and Related Research","volume":"8 3","pages":"253-266"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11165496/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine Surgery and Related Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22603/ssrr.2023-0244","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Tranexamic acid (TXA) has gained popularity in spinal surgery because of its potential to reduce blood loss. However, concerns regarding its safety and efficacy remain. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of TXA in reducing blood loss and its safety profile in spinal surgeries.

Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted in electronic databases for randomized controlled trials and prospective studies evaluating the use of TXA in spinal surgery. The primary outcomes were intraoperative and total estimated blood loss (EBL), and the secondary outcomes included the incidence and types of complications associated with TXA use. Meta-analyses were performed using random-effects models.

Results: Thirteen studies involving 1,213 participants were included in the meta-analysis. The use of TXA was associated with significant reductions in both intraoperative (mean difference: -46.56 mL [-73.85, -19.26], p<0.01]) and total EBL (mean difference: -210.17 mL [-284.93, -135.40], p<0.01) while also decreasing the need for blood transfusions (risk ratio: 0.68 [0.51, 0.90], p<0.01). No significant difference was found in the incidence and types of thrombotic complications when TXA was used in spinal surgery. Subgroup analysis showed consistent results in instrumentation and fusion surgery and different doses of TXA.

Conclusions: TXA is effective in reducing intraoperative and overall blood loss in spinal surgery without increasing the risk of complications. These findings support the use of TXA to improve patient outcomes. However, caution should be exercised because of the heterogeneity among the included studies. Further research is needed to confirm these findings and explore potential long-term complications.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
氨甲环酸在脊柱手术中的安全性和有效性:系统回顾与元分析》。
背景:氨甲环酸(TXA)因其减少失血的潜力而在脊柱手术中大受欢迎。然而,人们对其安全性和有效性的担忧依然存在。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估氨甲环酸在脊柱手术中减少失血的疗效及其安全性:方法:我们在电子数据库中全面搜索了评估在脊柱手术中使用 TXA 的随机对照试验和前瞻性研究。主要结果是术中失血量和估计总失血量(EBL),次要结果包括使用 TXA 相关并发症的发生率和类型。采用随机效应模型进行了 Meta 分析:共有13项研究纳入了荟萃分析,涉及1213名参与者。使用 TXA 可显著降低术中出血量(平均差:-46.56 mL [-46.56 mL [-46.56 mL]):平均差异:-46.56 mL [-73.85, -19.26],p结论:TXA能有效减少脊柱手术的术中失血量和总失血量,且不会增加并发症风险。这些研究结果支持使用 TXA 改善患者预后。然而,由于纳入的研究之间存在异质性,因此应谨慎行事。还需要进一步的研究来证实这些发现并探讨潜在的长期并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
A Case of Early Onset Scoliosis with Trisomy 1q and Monosomy 21q. Artificial Intelligence Classification for Detecting and Grading Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Degeneration. A Case of Desmoplastic Fibroma of the Thoracic Spine with Incomplete Paralysis of both Lower Limbs. Transcostal Microendoscopic Discectomy for Central Thoracic Disc Herniation Causing Myelopathy: A Technical Note. Posterior Column Reconstruction of the Lumbar Spine Using En Bloc Resected Vertebral Arch in Spinal Tumor and Deformity Surgeries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1