Psychosocial Evaluation of Living Kidney Donors: A Survey of Current Practices in the United States.

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 IMMUNOLOGY Transplantation Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-13 DOI:10.1097/TP.0000000000005095
Erin Clifton, Gerald Scott Winder, Krista L Lentine, Paula C Zimbrean, Anju Yadav, Susan Rubman, Roberto Kalil, Vineeta Kumar, Rohini Prashar, Geliang Gan, Yanhong Deng, Michael Joyce, Rachel Holmes, Jennie Laflen, Darsh Bakhai, AnnMarie Liapakis, Mona D Doshi
{"title":"Psychosocial Evaluation of Living Kidney Donors: A Survey of Current Practices in the United States.","authors":"Erin Clifton, Gerald Scott Winder, Krista L Lentine, Paula C Zimbrean, Anju Yadav, Susan Rubman, Roberto Kalil, Vineeta Kumar, Rohini Prashar, Geliang Gan, Yanhong Deng, Michael Joyce, Rachel Holmes, Jennie Laflen, Darsh Bakhai, AnnMarie Liapakis, Mona D Doshi","doi":"10.1097/TP.0000000000005095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Best practices in psychosocial evaluation and care of living donor candidates and donors are not well established.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We surveyed 195 living kidney donor (LKD) transplant centers in United States from October 2021 to April 2022 querying (1) composition of psychosocial teams, (2) evaluation processes including clinical tools and domains assessed, (3) selection criteria, and (4) psychosocial follow-up post-donation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We received 161 responses from 104 programs, representing 53% of active LKD programs and 67% of LKD transplant volume in 2019. Most respondents (63%) were social workers/independent living donor advocates. Over 90% of respondents indicated donor candidates with known mental health or substance use disorders were initially evaluated by the psychosocial team. Validated psychometric or transplant-specific tools were rarely utilized but domains assessed were consistent. Active suicidality, self-harm, and psychosis were considered absolute contraindications in >90% of programs. Active depression was absolute contraindication in 50% of programs; active anxiety disorder was excluded 27%. Conditions not contraindicated to donation include those in remission: anxiety (56%), depression (53%), and posttraumatic stress disorder (41%). There was acceptance of donor candidates using alcohol, tobacco, or cannabis recreationally, but not if pattern met criteria for active use disorder. Seventy-one percent of programs conducted post-donation psychosocial assessment and use local resources to support donors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There was variation in acceptance of donor candidates with mental health or substance use disorders. Although most programs conducted psychosocial screening post-donation, support is not standardized and unclear if adequate. Future studies are needed for consensus building among transplant centers to form guidelines for donor evaluation, acceptance, and support.</p>","PeriodicalId":23316,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation","volume":" ","pages":"e382-e389"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000005095","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Best practices in psychosocial evaluation and care of living donor candidates and donors are not well established.

Methods: We surveyed 195 living kidney donor (LKD) transplant centers in United States from October 2021 to April 2022 querying (1) composition of psychosocial teams, (2) evaluation processes including clinical tools and domains assessed, (3) selection criteria, and (4) psychosocial follow-up post-donation.

Results: We received 161 responses from 104 programs, representing 53% of active LKD programs and 67% of LKD transplant volume in 2019. Most respondents (63%) were social workers/independent living donor advocates. Over 90% of respondents indicated donor candidates with known mental health or substance use disorders were initially evaluated by the psychosocial team. Validated psychometric or transplant-specific tools were rarely utilized but domains assessed were consistent. Active suicidality, self-harm, and psychosis were considered absolute contraindications in >90% of programs. Active depression was absolute contraindication in 50% of programs; active anxiety disorder was excluded 27%. Conditions not contraindicated to donation include those in remission: anxiety (56%), depression (53%), and posttraumatic stress disorder (41%). There was acceptance of donor candidates using alcohol, tobacco, or cannabis recreationally, but not if pattern met criteria for active use disorder. Seventy-one percent of programs conducted post-donation psychosocial assessment and use local resources to support donors.

Conclusions: There was variation in acceptance of donor candidates with mental health or substance use disorders. Although most programs conducted psychosocial screening post-donation, support is not standardized and unclear if adequate. Future studies are needed for consensus building among transplant centers to form guidelines for donor evaluation, acceptance, and support.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
活体肾脏捐献者的社会心理评估:美国现行做法调查。
背景对活体捐献者候选人和捐献者进行社会心理评估和护理的最佳实践尚未确立:从 2021 年 10 月到 2022 年 4 月,我们对美国 195 个活体肾脏捐献(LKD)移植中心进行了调查,内容包括:(1)社会心理团队的组成;(2)包括临床工具和评估领域在内的评估流程;(3)选择标准;以及(4)捐献后的社会心理随访:我们收到了来自 104 个项目的 161 份回复,占 2019 年活跃 LKD 项目的 53% 和 LKD 移植量的 67%。大多数受访者(63%)是社会工作者/独立活体捐献倡导者。超过 90% 的受访者表示,有已知心理健康或药物使用障碍的捐献者候选人由社会心理团队进行初步评估。很少使用经过验证的心理测量工具或移植专用工具,但评估的领域是一致的。超过 90% 的项目将活动性自杀、自残和精神病视为绝对禁忌症。50%的计划将活动性抑郁症视为绝对禁忌症;27%的计划将活动性焦虑症排除在外。不属于捐献禁忌症的疾病包括缓解期的焦虑症(56%)、抑郁症(53%)和创伤后应激障碍(41%)。接受以娱乐方式使用酒精、烟草或大麻的捐献候选人,但如果模式符合主动使用障碍的标准,则不接受。71%的项目进行了捐献后社会心理评估,并利用当地资源为捐献者提供支持:结论:在接受有精神健康或药物使用障碍的捐献者候选人方面存在差异。尽管大多数项目都会在捐献后进行社会心理筛查,但支持工作并不规范,也不清楚是否足够。未来的研究需要在移植中心之间建立共识,以形成捐赠者评估、接受和支持的指导方针。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transplantation
Transplantation 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
11.30%
发文量
1906
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The official journal of The Transplantation Society, and the International Liver Transplantation Society, Transplantation is published monthly and is the most cited and influential journal in the field, with more than 25,000 citations per year. Transplantation has been the trusted source for extensive and timely coverage of the most important advances in transplantation for over 50 years. The Editors and Editorial Board are an international group of research and clinical leaders that includes many pioneers of the field, representing a diverse range of areas of expertise. This capable editorial team provides thoughtful and thorough peer review, and delivers rapid, careful and insightful editorial evaluation of all manuscripts submitted to the journal. Transplantation is committed to rapid review and publication. The journal remains competitive with a time to first decision of fewer than 21 days. Transplantation was the first in the field to offer CME credit to its peer reviewers for reviews completed. The journal publishes original research articles in original clinical science and original basic science. Short reports bring attention to research at the forefront of the field. Other areas covered include cell therapy and islet transplantation, immunobiology and genomics, and xenotransplantation. ​
期刊最新文献
Ischemia/Reperfusion Upregulates Genes Related to PANoptosis in Human Lung Transplants. Advances in Understanding the Complexities of Recurrent HCC Following Liver Transplantation. Another Viral Infection Linked to Posttransplant Diabetes Mellitus? Association of COVID-19 With Risk of Posttransplant Diabetes Mellitus. Comparative Outcome Analysis of Lenvatinib Versus Sorafenib for Recurrence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Liver Transplantation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1