Evaluating the benefits of machine learning for diagnosing deep vein thrombosis compared to gold standard ultrasound- a feasibility study.

IF 2.5 Q2 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE BJGP Open Pub Date : 2024-06-12 DOI:10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0057
Kerstin Nothnagel, Mohammed Farid Aslam
{"title":"Evaluating the benefits of machine learning for diagnosing deep vein thrombosis compared to gold standard ultrasound- a feasibility study.","authors":"Kerstin Nothnagel, Mohammed Farid Aslam","doi":"10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study evaluates the feasibility of remote deep venous thrombosis (DVT) diagnosis via ultrasound sequences facilitated by ThinkSono Guidance, an artificial intelligence (AI)-app, for point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS).</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim is to assess the effectiveness of AI-guided POCUS conducted by non-specialists in capturing valid ultrasound images for remote diagnosis of DVT.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>Over a 3.5-month period, patients with suspected DVT underwent AI-guided POCUS conducted by non-specialists using a handheld ultrasound probe connected to the app. These ultrasound sequences were uploaded to a cloud-dashboard for remote specialist review. Additionally, participants received a formal DVT scans.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Patients underwent AI-guided POCUS using handheld probes connected to the AI-app, followed by formal DVT scans. Ultrasound sequences acquired during the AI-guided scan were uploaded to a cloud-dashboard for remote specialist review, where image quality was assessed, and diagnoses were provided.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 91 predominantly elderly female participants, 18% of scans were incomplete. Of the rest, 91% had sufficient quality, with 64% categorised by remote clinicians as \"compressible\" or \"incompressible.\" Sensitivity and specificity for adequately imaged scans were 100% and 91%, respectively. Notably, 53% were low risk, potentially obviating formal scans.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ThinkSono Guidance effectively directed non-specialists, streamlining DVT diagnosis and treatment. It may reduce the need for formal scans, particularly with negative findings, and extend diagnostic capabilities to primary care. The study highlights AI-assisted POCUS potential in improving DVT assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":36541,"journal":{"name":"BJGP Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJGP Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study evaluates the feasibility of remote deep venous thrombosis (DVT) diagnosis via ultrasound sequences facilitated by ThinkSono Guidance, an artificial intelligence (AI)-app, for point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS).

Aim: The aim is to assess the effectiveness of AI-guided POCUS conducted by non-specialists in capturing valid ultrasound images for remote diagnosis of DVT.

Design & setting: Over a 3.5-month period, patients with suspected DVT underwent AI-guided POCUS conducted by non-specialists using a handheld ultrasound probe connected to the app. These ultrasound sequences were uploaded to a cloud-dashboard for remote specialist review. Additionally, participants received a formal DVT scans.

Method: Patients underwent AI-guided POCUS using handheld probes connected to the AI-app, followed by formal DVT scans. Ultrasound sequences acquired during the AI-guided scan were uploaded to a cloud-dashboard for remote specialist review, where image quality was assessed, and diagnoses were provided.

Results: Among 91 predominantly elderly female participants, 18% of scans were incomplete. Of the rest, 91% had sufficient quality, with 64% categorised by remote clinicians as "compressible" or "incompressible." Sensitivity and specificity for adequately imaged scans were 100% and 91%, respectively. Notably, 53% were low risk, potentially obviating formal scans.

Conclusion: ThinkSono Guidance effectively directed non-specialists, streamlining DVT diagnosis and treatment. It may reduce the need for formal scans, particularly with negative findings, and extend diagnostic capabilities to primary care. The study highlights AI-assisted POCUS potential in improving DVT assessment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估机器学习在诊断深静脉血栓方面与金标准超声波相比的优势--一项可行性研究。
背景:本研究评估了通过超声序列进行远程深静脉血栓(DVT)诊断的可行性,超声序列由用于护理点超声(POCUS)的人工智能(AI)应用程序 ThinkSono Guidance 提供:在为期3.5个月的时间里,疑似深静脉血栓患者在非专科医生的AI指导下,使用连接到应用程序的手持式超声探头进行了POCUS检查。这些超声波序列被上传到云仪表板,供专家远程审查。此外,参与者还接受了正式的深静脉血栓扫描:方法:患者使用连接到人工智能应用程序的手持探头接受人工智能指导的 POCUS 检查,然后进行正式的深静脉血栓扫描。在人工智能指导下进行扫描时获得的超声波序列被上传到云仪表板,供远程专家审查,并对图像质量进行评估和提供诊断结果:在 91 名主要为老年女性的参与者中,18% 的扫描结果不完整。其余91%的扫描质量合格,其中64%被远程临床医生归类为 "可压缩 "或 "不可压缩"。充分成像扫描的灵敏度和特异度分别为 100% 和 91%。值得注意的是,53%的患者属于低风险,可能无需进行正式扫描:ThinkSono指南有效地指导了非专业人员,简化了深静脉血栓的诊断和治疗。结论:ThinkSono 指导可有效指导非专科医生,简化深静脉血栓的诊断和治疗,减少对正式扫描的需求,尤其是对阴性结果的需求,并将诊断能力扩展到初级保健。该研究强调了人工智能辅助 POCUS 在改善深静脉血栓评估方面的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BJGP Open
BJGP Open Medicine-Family Practice
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
Primary care performance in a Ugandan rural district: cross-sectional descriptive study. Mental healthcare and pragmatic shared decision-making in general practice: An interview study. Treating the perimenopause in the UK armed forces: a mixed methods review exploring the confidence of general practitioners. Translating primary care to telehealth: analysis of in-person paediatric consultations and role of the carers. Identifying where hospital and community trusts are managing general practices in England: a service mapping study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1