The barriers to uptake of disaster risk management science in urban planning: A political economy analysis

IF 2.4 3区 管理学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Disasters Pub Date : 2024-06-13 DOI:10.1111/disa.12644
Vikrant Panwar, Emily Wilkinson, Mark Pelling
{"title":"The barriers to uptake of disaster risk management science in urban planning: A political economy analysis","authors":"Vikrant Panwar,&nbsp;Emily Wilkinson,&nbsp;Mark Pelling","doi":"10.1111/disa.12644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>There is increasing effort in science to support disaster risk management (DRM) and climate change adaptation in urban environments. It is now common for research calls and projects to reference coproduction methods and science uptake goals. This paper identifies lessons for researchers, research funders, and research users wishing to enable useful, useable, and used science based on the perspectives of research users in urban planning from low- and middle-income countries. DRM-supporting science is viewed by policy actors as: complicated and poorly communicated; presenting inadequate, partial, and outdated information; misaligned with policy cycles; and costly to access and inadequately positioned to overcome the policy barriers that hinder integration of DRM into urban planning. Addressing these specific concerns points to more systematic collection and organisation of data and enhancement of supporting administrative structures to facilitate better sight of human vulnerability and its link to development decision-making and wider processes of urban risk creation.</p>","PeriodicalId":48088,"journal":{"name":"Disasters","volume":"48 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/disa.12644","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disasters","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/disa.12644","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is increasing effort in science to support disaster risk management (DRM) and climate change adaptation in urban environments. It is now common for research calls and projects to reference coproduction methods and science uptake goals. This paper identifies lessons for researchers, research funders, and research users wishing to enable useful, useable, and used science based on the perspectives of research users in urban planning from low- and middle-income countries. DRM-supporting science is viewed by policy actors as: complicated and poorly communicated; presenting inadequate, partial, and outdated information; misaligned with policy cycles; and costly to access and inadequately positioned to overcome the policy barriers that hinder integration of DRM into urban planning. Addressing these specific concerns points to more systematic collection and organisation of data and enhancement of supporting administrative structures to facilitate better sight of human vulnerability and its link to development decision-making and wider processes of urban risk creation.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
城市规划中采用灾害风险管理科学的障碍:政治经济学分析。
为支持城市环境中的灾害风险管理(DRM)和气候变化适应,科学界做出了越来越多的努力。现在,研究呼吁和项目通常都会提及共同生产方法和科学吸收目标。本文从中低收入国家城市规划研究用户的视角出发,指出了研究人员、研究资助者和研究用户在实现有用、可用和被使用的科学方面应吸取的经验教训。政策参与者认为支持 DRM 的科学:复杂且沟通不畅;提供的信息不充分、不全面且过时;与政策周期不一致;获取成本高昂且无法克服阻碍将 DRM 纳入城市规划的政策障碍。要解决这些具体问题,就需要更系统地收集和组织数据,加强支持性行政结构,以便更好地了解人类的脆弱性及其与发展决策和更广泛的城市风险创造过程之间的联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Disasters
Disasters Multiple-
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.10%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: Disasters is a major, peer-reviewed quarterly journal reporting on all aspects of disaster studies, policy and management. It provides a forum for academics, policymakers and practitioners to publish high-quality research and practice concerning natural catastrophes, anthropogenic disasters, complex political emergencies and protracted crises around the world. The journal promotes the interchange of ideas and experience, maintaining a balance between field reports, case study articles of general interest and academic papers. Disasters: Is the leading journal in the field of disasters, protracted crises and complex emergencies Influences disaster prevention, mitigation and response policies and practices Adopts a world-wide geographical perspective Contains a mix of academic papers and field studies Promotes the interchange of ideas between practitioners, policy-makers and academics.
期刊最新文献
Famine and food security: new trends and systems or politics as usual? An introduction. Five levels of famine prevention: towards a framework for the twenty-first century and beyond. Food insecurity, xenophobia, and political legitimacy: exploring the links in post-COVID-19 South Africa. Food systems in protracted crises: examining indigenous food sovereignty amid de-development in Kashmir. Sudan's catastrophe: the role of changing dynamics of food and power in the Gezira agricultural scheme.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1