The rise of medical influencers: The pros and the cons.

IF 1.1 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-12 DOI:10.1177/14782715241261736
Isaac Ks Ng, Christopher Thong, Li Feng Tan, Desmond B Teo
{"title":"The rise of medical influencers: The pros and the cons.","authors":"Isaac Ks Ng, Christopher Thong, Li Feng Tan, Desmond B Teo","doi":"10.1177/14782715241261736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the past few years, the online influencer industry has exponentially expanded, fuelled by the COVID pandemic lockdown, increased social media platforms and lifestyle appeal of influencership. This phenomenon has likewise infiltrated the medical field, where many healthcare practitioners have taken to social media platforms for content creation and influencer marketing. There are many reasons that underlie medical influencership - some may use it to improve public health literacy and correct medical misinformation, engage in medical advocacy or use the platform simply as a means of humanistic expression of the medical career, while others may seek to advertise private practice/medical products, boost personal reputation, and gain popularity and monetary benefits. Regardless of the underlying motivations of the medical influencers, some have fallen afoul of professionally accepted practices and ethical boundaries in their use of social media platforms, leading to serious consequences such as professional sanctioning or termination of employment. In this article, we hope to provide a comprehensive review of the 'good' (positive practices), the 'bad' (practices with possible unintended negative consequences) and the outright unprofessional or unethical behaviours aspects of social media use by medical influencers and offer practical strategies to ensure responsible and meaningful use of influencer platforms at both the physician and health systems level.</p>","PeriodicalId":46606,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14782715241261736","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the past few years, the online influencer industry has exponentially expanded, fuelled by the COVID pandemic lockdown, increased social media platforms and lifestyle appeal of influencership. This phenomenon has likewise infiltrated the medical field, where many healthcare practitioners have taken to social media platforms for content creation and influencer marketing. There are many reasons that underlie medical influencership - some may use it to improve public health literacy and correct medical misinformation, engage in medical advocacy or use the platform simply as a means of humanistic expression of the medical career, while others may seek to advertise private practice/medical products, boost personal reputation, and gain popularity and monetary benefits. Regardless of the underlying motivations of the medical influencers, some have fallen afoul of professionally accepted practices and ethical boundaries in their use of social media platforms, leading to serious consequences such as professional sanctioning or termination of employment. In this article, we hope to provide a comprehensive review of the 'good' (positive practices), the 'bad' (practices with possible unintended negative consequences) and the outright unprofessional or unethical behaviours aspects of social media use by medical influencers and offer practical strategies to ensure responsible and meaningful use of influencer platforms at both the physician and health systems level.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医疗影响者的崛起:利与弊。
在过去几年中,受 COVID 大流行病封锁、社交媒体平台增加以及生活方式对影响力的吸引力等因素的推动,网络影响力行业急剧扩大。这一现象同样也渗透到了医疗领域,许多医疗从业者都在社交媒体平台上进行内容创作和影响力营销。医疗影响力的产生有很多原因--有些人可能是为了提高公众健康素养、纠正医疗误导、参与医疗宣传,或仅仅将该平台作为医疗事业人文表达的一种手段;而另一些人则可能是为了宣传私人诊所/医疗产品、提高个人声誉、获得人气和金钱利益。无论医疗影响者的潜在动机如何,有些人在使用社交媒体平台时已经触犯了专业公认的惯例和道德底线,导致了严重的后果,如专业制裁或解聘。在本文中,我们希望全面回顾医疗影响者使用社交媒体的 "好"(积极做法)、"坏"(可能产生意外负面后果的做法)以及完全不专业或不道德的行为,并提供实用策略,以确保在医生和医疗系统层面负责任地、有意义地使用影响者平台。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
81
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh (JRCPE) is the College’s quarterly, peer-reviewed journal, with an international circulation of 8,000. It has three main emphases – clinical medicine, education and medical history. The online JRCPE provides full access to the contents of the print journal and has a number of additional features including advance online publication of recently accepted papers, an online archive, online-only papers, online symposia abstracts, and a series of topic-specific supplements, primarily based on the College’s consensus conferences.
期刊最新文献
James (Carrick) Moore (1763-1860): Another (Scottish) Local Anaesthetic Hero. Storytelling: A learning tool to enhance medical students' empathy, attentive listening, clinical curiosity and reflection. Hereditary haemochromatosis: A review. Pellagra in chronic alcoholism: An underdiagnosed condition in modern clinical practice. Successful management of refractory Cushing's disease with severe hypercortisolemia using etomidate and temozolomide in post-surgical failure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1