Bottom-up butterfly model with thorax-pitch control and wing-pitch flexibility.

IF 3.1 3区 计算机科学 Q1 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Bioinspiration & Biomimetics Pub Date : 2024-06-28 DOI:10.1088/1748-3190/ad5779
Kosuke Suzuki, Daichi Iguchi, Kou Ishizaki, Masato Yoshino
{"title":"Bottom-up butterfly model with thorax-pitch control and wing-pitch flexibility.","authors":"Kosuke Suzuki, Daichi Iguchi, Kou Ishizaki, Masato Yoshino","doi":"10.1088/1748-3190/ad5779","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The diversity in butterfly morphology has attracted many people around the world since ancient times. Despite morphological diversity, the wing and body kinematics of butterflies have several common features. In the present study, we constructed a bottom-up butterfly model, whose morphology and kinematics are simplified while preserving the important features of butterflies. The present bottom-up butterfly model is composed of two trapezoidal wings and a rod-shaped body with a thorax and abdomen. Its wings are flapped downward in the downstroke and backward in the upstroke by changing the geometric angle of attack (AOA). The geometric AOA is determined by the thorax-pitch and wing-pitch angles. The thorax-pitch angle is actively controlled by abdominal undulation, and the wing-pitch angle is passively determined because of a rotary spring representing the basalar and subalar muscles connecting the wings and thorax. We investigated the effectiveness of abdominal undulation for thorax-pitch control and how wing-pitch flexibility affects aerodynamic-force generation and thorax-pitch control, through numerical simulations using the immersed boundary-lattice Boltzmann method. As a result, the thorax-pitch angle perfectly follows the desired angle through abdominal undulation. In addition, there is an optimal wing-pitch flexibility that maximizes the flying speed in both the forward and upward directions, but the effect of wing-pitch flexibility on thorax-pitch control is not significant. Finally, we compared the flight behavior of the present bottom-up butterfly model with that of an actual butterfly. It was found that the present model does not reproduce reasonable body kinematics but can provide reasonable aerodynamics in butterfly flights.</p>","PeriodicalId":55377,"journal":{"name":"Bioinspiration & Biomimetics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioinspiration & Biomimetics","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-3190/ad5779","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The diversity in butterfly morphology has attracted many people around the world since ancient times. Despite morphological diversity, the wing and body kinematics of butterflies have several common features. In the present study, we constructed a bottom-up butterfly model, whose morphology and kinematics are simplified while preserving the important features of butterflies. The present bottom-up butterfly model is composed of two trapezoidal wings and a rod-shaped body with a thorax and abdomen. Its wings are flapped downward in the downstroke and backward in the upstroke by changing the geometric angle of attack (AOA). The geometric AOA is determined by the thorax-pitch and wing-pitch angles. The thorax-pitch angle is actively controlled by abdominal undulation, and the wing-pitch angle is passively determined because of a rotary spring representing the basalar and subalar muscles connecting the wings and thorax. We investigated the effectiveness of abdominal undulation for thorax-pitch control and how wing-pitch flexibility affects aerodynamic-force generation and thorax-pitch control, through numerical simulations using the immersed boundary-lattice Boltzmann method. As a result, the thorax-pitch angle perfectly follows the desired angle through abdominal undulation. In addition, there is an optimal wing-pitch flexibility that maximizes the flying speed in both the forward and upward directions, but the effect of wing-pitch flexibility on thorax-pitch control is not significant. Finally, we compared the flight behavior of the present bottom-up butterfly model with that of an actual butterfly. It was found that the present model does not reproduce reasonable body kinematics but can provide reasonable aerodynamics in butterfly flights.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自下而上的黄油飞行模型,具有胸部俯仰控制和机翼俯仰灵活性。
自古以来,蝴蝶形态的多样性吸引了世界各地的许多人。尽管形态各异,但蝴蝶的翅膀和身体运动学有一些共同的特征。在本研究中,我们构建了一个自下而上的蝴蝶模型,在保留蝴蝶重要特征的基础上简化了其形态和运动学特征。本自下而上的蝴蝶模型由两个梯形翅膀和一个带有胸部和腹部的杆状身体组成。通过改变几何攻角,其机翼在下冲程向下翻转,在上冲程向后翻转。几何攻角由胸俯角和翼俯角决定。胸部俯仰角由腹部起伏主动控制,而翅膀俯仰角则由代表连接翅膀和胸部的基底肌肉和副基底肌肉的旋转弹簧被动决定。我们利用沉浸边界-晶格玻尔兹曼方法进行了数值模拟,研究了腹部起伏对胸部俯仰角控制的有效性,以及翼俯仰角的弹性如何影响空气动力的产生和胸部俯仰角的控制。结果表明,由于腹部起伏,胸俯角完全符合预期角度。此外,存在一个最佳的翼展弹性,它能使向前和向上的飞行速度最大化,但翼展弹性对胸俯仰控制的影响并不显著。最后,我们将自下而上的黄油飞行模型的飞行行为与实际黄油飞行的飞行行为进行了比较。结果发现,本模型不能再现合理的身体运动学,但可以提供合理的黄油飞行高度空气动力学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Bioinspiration & Biomimetics
Bioinspiration & Biomimetics 工程技术-材料科学:生物材料
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
14.70%
发文量
132
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Bioinspiration & Biomimetics publishes research involving the study and distillation of principles and functions found in biological systems that have been developed through evolution, and application of this knowledge to produce novel and exciting basic technologies and new approaches to solving scientific problems. It provides a forum for interdisciplinary research which acts as a pipeline, facilitating the two-way flow of ideas and understanding between the extensive bodies of knowledge of the different disciplines. It has two principal aims: to draw on biology to enrich engineering and to draw from engineering to enrich biology. The journal aims to include input from across all intersecting areas of both fields. In biology, this would include work in all fields from physiology to ecology, with either zoological or botanical focus. In engineering, this would include both design and practical application of biomimetic or bioinspired devices and systems. Typical areas of interest include: Systems, designs and structure Communication and navigation Cooperative behaviour Self-organizing biological systems Self-healing and self-assembly Aerial locomotion and aerospace applications of biomimetics Biomorphic surface and subsurface systems Marine dynamics: swimming and underwater dynamics Applications of novel materials Biomechanics; including movement, locomotion, fluidics Cellular behaviour Sensors and senses Biomimetic or bioinformed approaches to geological exploration.
期刊最新文献
Stability and agility trade-offs in spring-wing systems. Genetic algorithm-based optimal design for fluidic artificial muscle (FAM) bundles. Touch-down condition control for the bipedal spring-mass model in walking. Predictive uncertainty in state-estimation drives active sensing. Analysis and actuation design of a novel at-scale 3-DOF biomimetic flapping-wing mechanism inspired by flying insects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1