Evaluation of the classifications of severity in acute respiratory distress syndrome in childhood by the Berlin Consensus and the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference.

Critical care science Pub Date : 2024-06-10 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.62675/2965-2774.20240229-en
Roberta Costa Capela, Raquel Belmino de Souza, Maria de Fátima Pombo Sant'Anna, Clemax Couto Sant'Anna
{"title":"Evaluation of the classifications of severity in acute respiratory distress syndrome in childhood by the Berlin Consensus and the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference.","authors":"Roberta Costa Capela, Raquel Belmino de Souza, Maria de Fátima Pombo Sant'Anna, Clemax Couto Sant'Anna","doi":"10.62675/2965-2774.20240229-en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare two methods for defining and classifying the severity of pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin classification, which uses the relationship between the partial pressure of oxygen and the fraction of inspired oxygen, and the classification of the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference, which uses the oxygenation index.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective study of patients aged 0 - 18 years with a diagnosis of acute respiratory distress syndrome who were invasively mechanically ventilated and provided one to three arterial blood gas samples, totaling 140 valid measurements. These measures were evaluated for correlation using the Spearman test and agreement using the kappa coefficient between the two classifications, initially using the general population of the study and then subdividing it into patients with and without bronchospasm and those with and without the use of neuromuscular blockers. The effect of these two factors (bronchospasm and neuromuscular blocking agent) separately and together on both classifications was also assessed using two-way analysis of variance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the general population, who were 54 patients aged 0 - 18 years a strong negative correlation was found by Spearman's test (ρ -0.91; p < 0.001), and strong agreement was found by the kappa coefficient (0.62; p < 0.001) in the comparison between Berlin and Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference. In the populations with and without bronchospasm and who did and did not use neuromuscular blockers, the correlation coefficients were similar to those of the general population, though among patients not using neuromuscular blockers, there was greater agreement between the classifications than for patients using neuromuscular blockers (kappa 0.67 versus 0.56, p < 0.001 for both). Neuromuscular blockers had a significant effect on the relationship between the partial pressure of oxygen and the fraction of inspired oxygen (analysis of variance; F: 12.9; p < 0.001) and the oxygenation index (analysis of variance; F: 8.3; p = 0.004).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There was a strong correlation and agreement between the two classifications in the general population and in the subgroups studied. Use of neuromuscular blockers had a significant effect on the severity of acute respiratory distress syndrome.</p>","PeriodicalId":72721,"journal":{"name":"Critical care science","volume":"36 ","pages":"e20240229en"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11152442/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical care science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62675/2965-2774.20240229-en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare two methods for defining and classifying the severity of pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin classification, which uses the relationship between the partial pressure of oxygen and the fraction of inspired oxygen, and the classification of the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference, which uses the oxygenation index.

Methods: This was a prospective study of patients aged 0 - 18 years with a diagnosis of acute respiratory distress syndrome who were invasively mechanically ventilated and provided one to three arterial blood gas samples, totaling 140 valid measurements. These measures were evaluated for correlation using the Spearman test and agreement using the kappa coefficient between the two classifications, initially using the general population of the study and then subdividing it into patients with and without bronchospasm and those with and without the use of neuromuscular blockers. The effect of these two factors (bronchospasm and neuromuscular blocking agent) separately and together on both classifications was also assessed using two-way analysis of variance.

Results: In the general population, who were 54 patients aged 0 - 18 years a strong negative correlation was found by Spearman's test (ρ -0.91; p < 0.001), and strong agreement was found by the kappa coefficient (0.62; p < 0.001) in the comparison between Berlin and Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference. In the populations with and without bronchospasm and who did and did not use neuromuscular blockers, the correlation coefficients were similar to those of the general population, though among patients not using neuromuscular blockers, there was greater agreement between the classifications than for patients using neuromuscular blockers (kappa 0.67 versus 0.56, p < 0.001 for both). Neuromuscular blockers had a significant effect on the relationship between the partial pressure of oxygen and the fraction of inspired oxygen (analysis of variance; F: 12.9; p < 0.001) and the oxygenation index (analysis of variance; F: 8.3; p = 0.004).

Conclusion: There was a strong correlation and agreement between the two classifications in the general population and in the subgroups studied. Use of neuromuscular blockers had a significant effect on the severity of acute respiratory distress syndrome.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
柏林共识和儿科急性肺损伤共识会议对儿童急性呼吸窘迫综合征严重程度分类的评估。
目的:比较两种定义和划分小儿急性呼吸窘迫综合征严重程度的方法:比较两种定义和划分小儿急性呼吸窘迫综合征严重程度的方法:柏林分类法和小儿急性肺损伤共识会议分类法,前者使用氧分压和吸入氧分压之间的关系,后者使用氧合指数:这是一项前瞻性研究,研究对象是被诊断为急性呼吸窘迫综合征的 0 - 18 岁有创机械通气患者,他们提供了一至三次动脉血气样本,共计 140 次有效测量。这些测量结果使用斯皮尔曼检验进行相关性评估,并使用卡帕系数评估两种分类之间的一致性,最初使用的是研究的一般人群,然后将其细分为有支气管痉挛和没有支气管痉挛的患者,以及有使用神经肌肉阻滞剂和没有使用神经肌肉阻滞剂的患者。此外,还使用双向方差分析评估了这两个因素(支气管痉挛和神经肌肉阻滞剂)分别和共同对两种分类的影响:在普通人群(54 名 0-18 岁的患者)中,通过斯皮尔曼检验(ρ -0.91;p <0.001)发现两者之间存在很强的负相关;通过卡帕系数(0.62;p <0.001)发现,柏林和儿科急性肺损伤共识会议之间的比较具有很强的一致性。在有支气管痉挛和无支气管痉挛、使用和未使用神经肌肉阻滞剂的人群中,相关系数与普通人群相似,但在未使用神经肌肉阻滞剂的患者中,分类之间的一致性高于使用神经肌肉阻滞剂的患者(两者的卡帕系数分别为 0.67 和 0.56,p < 0.001)。神经肌肉阻滞剂对氧分压与吸入氧分压之间的关系(方差分析;F:12.9;p < 0.001)和氧合作用指数(方差分析;F:8.3;p = 0.004)有显著影响:结论:在一般人群和所研究的亚人群中,两种分类方法之间存在很强的相关性和一致性。使用神经肌肉阻滞剂对急性呼吸窘迫综合征的严重程度有显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analyzing how the components of the SOFA score change over time in their contribution to mortality. To: Clinical outcomes of intensive care unit-acquired weakness in critically ill COVID-19 patients. A prospective cohort study. Challenges in using the dynamic components of the SOFA score in health care databases. Impact of intensive care unit admission on cancer patients: enhancing long-term survival through better understanding. Rate of non-metastatic solid tumor progression following critical illness: a prospective cohort study of UK Biobank participants.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1