The performance of Khorana risk score for prediction of venous thromboembolism in patients with lung cancer: A retrospective cohort study.

Deniz Kizilirmak, Uğur Fidan, Yavuz Havlucu
{"title":"The performance of Khorana risk score for prediction of venous thromboembolism in patients with lung cancer: A retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Deniz Kizilirmak, Uğur Fidan, Yavuz Havlucu","doi":"10.5578/tt.202402921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cancer-related venous thromboembolism is one of the leading causes of mortality and morbidity in cancer patients. Lung cancer is the second most common cancer in the world and is closely related to venous thromboembolism. Venous thromboembolism affects survival in patients with cancer and it is important to be able to predict the possibility of thrombosis in patients with cancer. It was aimed to evaluate the predictive performance of the Khorana risk score in patients with lung cancer.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The medical data of the patients followed up with lung cancer were analyzed retrospectively. Venous thromboembolism events in lung cancer patients were described. The relationship between the Khorana risk score and the risk of venous thromboembolism was investigated using the cumulative incidence function with compared risk models.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Eight hundred fourteen lung cancer patients were included in the study. Venous thromboembolism was detected in 79 (9.7%) of the patients. Sixty one (77.2%) of the patients had pulmonary embolism, 15 (19%) had peripheral deep vein thrombosis and three (3.8%) had venous thrombosis of other sites. The cumulative incidences of venous thromboembolism for high and intermediate Khorana risk scores were 10.1% and 9.7%, respectively (p= 0.09). The cumulative incidences of venous thromboembolism at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months were 4.7%, 5.8%, 6.4%, and 9.6% for the high-grade Khorana risk score; 4.6%, 5.7%, 6.3% and 7.8% for the intermediate Khorana risk score (p= 0.11).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Khorana risk score was not found useful in the risk stratification of venous thromboembolism (intermediate or high risk) in patients with lung cancer. New scoring systems are needed to calculate the risk of venous thromboembolism in patients with lung cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":519894,"journal":{"name":"Tuberkuloz ve toraks","volume":"72 2","pages":"114-119"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11390077/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tuberkuloz ve toraks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5578/tt.202402921","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Cancer-related venous thromboembolism is one of the leading causes of mortality and morbidity in cancer patients. Lung cancer is the second most common cancer in the world and is closely related to venous thromboembolism. Venous thromboembolism affects survival in patients with cancer and it is important to be able to predict the possibility of thrombosis in patients with cancer. It was aimed to evaluate the predictive performance of the Khorana risk score in patients with lung cancer.

Materials and methods: The medical data of the patients followed up with lung cancer were analyzed retrospectively. Venous thromboembolism events in lung cancer patients were described. The relationship between the Khorana risk score and the risk of venous thromboembolism was investigated using the cumulative incidence function with compared risk models.

Result: Eight hundred fourteen lung cancer patients were included in the study. Venous thromboembolism was detected in 79 (9.7%) of the patients. Sixty one (77.2%) of the patients had pulmonary embolism, 15 (19%) had peripheral deep vein thrombosis and three (3.8%) had venous thrombosis of other sites. The cumulative incidences of venous thromboembolism for high and intermediate Khorana risk scores were 10.1% and 9.7%, respectively (p= 0.09). The cumulative incidences of venous thromboembolism at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months were 4.7%, 5.8%, 6.4%, and 9.6% for the high-grade Khorana risk score; 4.6%, 5.7%, 6.3% and 7.8% for the intermediate Khorana risk score (p= 0.11).

Conclusions: The Khorana risk score was not found useful in the risk stratification of venous thromboembolism (intermediate or high risk) in patients with lung cancer. New scoring systems are needed to calculate the risk of venous thromboembolism in patients with lung cancer.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Khorana 风险评分在预测肺癌患者静脉血栓栓塞方面的表现:一项回顾性队列研究
导言:与癌症相关的静脉血栓栓塞症是导致癌症患者死亡和发病的主要原因之一。肺癌是全球第二大常见癌症,与静脉血栓栓塞密切相关。静脉血栓栓塞影响癌症患者的生存,因此预测癌症患者血栓形成的可能性非常重要。本研究旨在评估霍拉娜风险评分对肺癌患者的预测能力:对肺癌随访患者的医疗数据进行回顾性分析。描述了肺癌患者的静脉血栓栓塞事件。使用累积发病率函数和比较风险模型研究了霍拉娜风险评分与静脉血栓栓塞风险之间的关系:研究共纳入了 814 名肺癌患者。79名患者(9.7%)发现静脉血栓栓塞。其中61人(77.2%)患有肺栓塞,15人(19%)患有外周深静脉血栓,3人(3.8%)患有其他部位的静脉血栓。霍拉娜风险高分和中分的静脉血栓栓塞累积发病率分别为 10.1%和 9.7%(P= 0.09)。在3、6、12和24个月的静脉血栓栓塞累积发生率中,Khorana风险评分高者分别为4.7%、5.8%、6.4%和9.6%;Khorana风险评分中者分别为4.6%、5.7%、6.3%和7.8%(P= 0.11):结论:霍拉纳风险评分对肺癌患者静脉血栓栓塞症的风险分层(中级或高级风险)没有帮助。需要新的评分系统来计算肺癌患者的静脉血栓栓塞风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An important radiological clue in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: Diffuse pulmonary ossification. GINA step 1-2 therapy: Low-dose ICSformoterol combination taken as needed or moderate-dose ICS-formoterol combination taken as needed? Lung cancer associated with cystic airspaces: A contemporary review. Pre-procedure preparation, monitoring, premedication and sedation practices of bronchoscopists in Türkiye. Radiologic severity index can be used to predict mortality risk in patients with COVID-19.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1