Mapping the interactions between task sequencing, anxiety, and enjoyment in L2 writing development

IF 5 1区 文学 Q1 LINGUISTICS Journal of Second Language Writing Pub Date : 2024-06-13 DOI:10.1016/j.jslw.2024.101116
Mahmoud Abdi Tabari , Gholam Hassan Khajavy , Julia Goetze
{"title":"Mapping the interactions between task sequencing, anxiety, and enjoyment in L2 writing development","authors":"Mahmoud Abdi Tabari ,&nbsp;Gholam Hassan Khajavy ,&nbsp;Julia Goetze","doi":"10.1016/j.jslw.2024.101116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study explores the relationships between task sequencing, task anxiety, task enjoyment, and second language (L2) writing development. While L2 writing is influenced by various factors, including task sequencing and learner-related variables, empirical evidence on the interactions between task sequencing and task emotions in L2 writing development is scarce. To address this gap, 75 L2 English students performed nine versions of three decision-making tasks in different sequences (simple to complex, complex to simple, or random) over nine weeks. The participants completed post-task questionnaires on their perceptions of the tasks, task anxiety, and task enjoyment, and their essays were analyzed for syntactic complexity, accuracy, lexical complexity, and fluency (CALF). Linear mixed-effect modeling examined the effect of task sequencing on CALF measures and task emotions. Results revealed that the simple-to-complex group had the best performance in CALF measures compared to other groups. Furthermore, the complex-to-simple group outperformed the random group in accuracy, lexical complexity, and fluency measures. Participants showed improved writing over time and experienced less task anxiety and more task enjoyment in the simple-to-complex group. Overall, this study suggests that task sequencing plays a crucial role in L2 writing development by improving learners’ performance, enjoyment, while reducing anxiety.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47934,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Second Language Writing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1060374324000237/pdfft?md5=74c630afdb3823653299582e39b932a6&pid=1-s2.0-S1060374324000237-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Second Language Writing","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1060374324000237","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explores the relationships between task sequencing, task anxiety, task enjoyment, and second language (L2) writing development. While L2 writing is influenced by various factors, including task sequencing and learner-related variables, empirical evidence on the interactions between task sequencing and task emotions in L2 writing development is scarce. To address this gap, 75 L2 English students performed nine versions of three decision-making tasks in different sequences (simple to complex, complex to simple, or random) over nine weeks. The participants completed post-task questionnaires on their perceptions of the tasks, task anxiety, and task enjoyment, and their essays were analyzed for syntactic complexity, accuracy, lexical complexity, and fluency (CALF). Linear mixed-effect modeling examined the effect of task sequencing on CALF measures and task emotions. Results revealed that the simple-to-complex group had the best performance in CALF measures compared to other groups. Furthermore, the complex-to-simple group outperformed the random group in accuracy, lexical complexity, and fluency measures. Participants showed improved writing over time and experienced less task anxiety and more task enjoyment in the simple-to-complex group. Overall, this study suggests that task sequencing plays a crucial role in L2 writing development by improving learners’ performance, enjoyment, while reducing anxiety.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
绘制任务排序、焦虑和乐趣在 L2 写作发展中的相互作用图
本研究探讨了任务排序、任务焦虑、任务乐趣与第二语言(L2)写作发展之间的关系。虽然 L2 写作受多种因素的影响,包括任务排序和学习者相关变量,但有关 L2 写作发展中任务排序和任务情绪之间相互作用的实证证据却很少。为了填补这一空白,75 名英语为第二语言的学生在九周的时间里以不同的顺序(从简单到复杂、从复杂到简单或随机)完成了九个版本的三个决策任务。参与者在任务后填写了关于他们对任务的看法、任务焦虑和任务乐趣的问卷,并对他们的文章进行了句法复杂性、准确性、词汇复杂性和流畅性(CALF)分析。线性混合效应模型检验了任务排序对 CALF 测量和任务情绪的影响。结果显示,与其他组别相比,从简单到复杂组的 CALF 指标表现最好。此外,从复杂到简单组在准确性、词汇复杂性和流畅性方面的表现优于随机组。随着时间的推移,简单到复杂组的学员写作水平有所提高,任务焦虑减少,任务乐趣增加。总之,本研究表明,任务排序在 L2 写作发展中起着至关重要的作用,它能提高学习者的成绩和乐趣,同时减少焦虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
13.10%
发文量
50
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Second Language Writing is devoted to publishing theoretically grounded reports of research and discussions that represent a significant contribution to current understandings of central issues in second and foreign language writing and writing instruction. Some areas of interest are personal characteristics and attitudes of L2 writers, L2 writers'' composing processes, features of L2 writers'' texts, readers'' responses to L2 writing, assessment/evaluation of L2 writing, contexts (cultural, social, political, institutional) for L2 writing, and any other topic clearly relevant to L2 writing theory, research, or instruction.
期刊最新文献
Ungrading as an assessment philosophy: Reliability, validity, and practicality Questions of time and communication: A writing program administrator's experiences with labor-based grading Towards a reconciliatory approach to ungrading in writing classes: A response to Crusan Writing performance and discourse organization in L2 Chinese: A longitudinal case study Ungrading: Revolution or evolution
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1